Critical Information Infrastructures: Should Models Represent Structures or Functions?
The common approaches to modeling and analyzing complex socio-technical systems, of which Critical Information Infrastructures is one example, assumes that they can be completely specified. The methods emphasize how systems are composed or structured and how component failures propagate. Since socio-technical systems always are underspecified, they cannot be analyzed in the same way. The alternative is to focus on their functions, and how the variability of functions can combine to create non-linear effects. An example of that is the Functional Resonance Analysis method (FRAM).
KeywordsComplexity risk socio-technical systems functional resonance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Perrow, C.: Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1984)Google Scholar
- 3.Albrechtsen, E., Hovden, J.: Industrial safety management and information security management: risk characteristics and management approaches. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
- 5.Hollnagel, E.: Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Aldershot (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Mercadier, V.: When incident command system fails. University of Berkeley, Berkely (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Nouvel, D., Travadel, S., Hollnagel, E.: Introduction of the concept of functional resonance in the analysis of a near-accident in aviation. In: 33rd ESReDA Seminar: Future challenges of accident investigation, Ispra, Italy, November 13-14 (2007)Google Scholar