Skip to main content

Does Body Orientation Matter When Reasoning about Depicted or Described Scenes?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space (Spatial Cognition 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5248))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1348 Accesses

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess whether the orientation of the body at the time of test affects the efficiency with which people reason about spatial relations that are encoded in memory through symbolic media. Experiment 1 used depicted spatial layouts while Experiment 2 used described environments. In contrast to previous studies with directly-experienced spatial layouts, the present experiments revealed no sensorimotor influences on performance. Differences in reasoning about immediate and non-immediate environments are thus discussed. Furthermore, the same patterns of findings (i.e., normal alignment effects) were observed in the two experiments supporting the idea of functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from different modalities.

The presented experiments have been conducted as a part of an undergraduate thesis by Stephanie Pantelidou.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amorim, M.A., et al.: Updating an object’s orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: a comparison between two processing modes. Percept. Psychophys. 59(3), 404–418 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farrell, M.J., Thomson, J.A.: On-Line Updating of Spatial Information Druing Locomotion Without Vision. J. Mot. Behav. 31(1), 39–53 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loomis, J.M., et al.: Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-d sound and spatial language. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28(2), 335–345 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rieser, J.J.: Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15(6), 1157–1165 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Presson, C.C., Montello, D.R.: Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception 23(12), 1447–1455 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, R.F., Spelke, E.S.: Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 77(3), 215–250 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. May, M.: Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: transformation versus interference accounts. Cognit. Psychol. 48(2), 163–206 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mou, W., et al.: Roles of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations in locomotion and reorientation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32(6), 1274–1290 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, J.W., Avraamides, M.N., Loomis, J.M.: Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33(6), 1092–1107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mou, W., et al.: Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30(1), 142–157 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mou, W., McNamara, T.P.: Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28(1), 162–170 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, R.F.: Between reality and imagination: when is spatial updating automatic? Percept Psychophys 66(1), 68–76 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, R.F., Brockmole, J.R.: Human navigation in nested environments. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29(3), 398–404 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Avraamides, M.N., Kelly, J.W.: Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cogn. Process (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Presson, C.C., Hazelrigg, M.D.: Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10(4), 716–722 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Avraamides, M.N.: Spatial updating of environments described in texts. Cognit. Psychol. 47(4), 402–431 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Avraamides, M.N., et al.: Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30(4), 804–814 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klatzky, R.L., et al.: Encoding, learning, and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3-D sound, spatial language, and vision. Exp. Brain. Res. 149(1), 48–61 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klatzky, R.L., et al.: Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language. Learn. Mem. 9(6), 364–367 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mellet, E., et al.: Neural basis of mental scanning of a topographic representation built from a text. Cereb Cortex 12(12), 1322–1330 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mellet, E., et al.: Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: the impact of route versus survey perspective learning. Neuroimage 12(5), 588–600 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Descriptions and depictions of environments. Mem. Cognit. 20(5), 483–496 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Denis, M., Zimmer, H.D.: Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions. Psychological Research 54(4), 286–298 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waller, D., et al.: Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28(6), 1051–1063 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison, A.M.: Reversal of the alignment effect: influence of visualization and spatial set size. In: Proceedings of the Annual Cognitive Science Meeting (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wildbur, D.J., Wilson, P.N.: Influences on the first-perspective alignment effect from text route descriptions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61(5), 763–783 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Easton, R.D., Sholl, M.J.: Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21(2), 483–500 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Waller, D., Hodgson, E.: Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32(4), 867–882 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Freksa Nora S. Newcombe Peter Gärdenfors Stefan Wölfl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avraamides, M.N., Pantelidou, S. (2008). Does Body Orientation Matter When Reasoning about Depicted or Described Scenes?. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds) Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space. Spatial Cognition 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87600-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87601-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics