Skip to main content

Route Learning Strategies in a Virtual Cluttered Environment

  • Conference paper
Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space (Spatial Cognition 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5248))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Here we present an experiment investigating human route learning behavior. Specific interest concerned the learning strategies as well as the underlying spatial knowledge. In the experiment naive participants were asked to learn a path between two locations in a complex, cluttered virtual environment that featured local and global landmark information. Participants were trained for several days until they solved the wayfinding task fastly and efficiently. The analysis of individual navigation behavior demontrates strong interindividual differences suggesting different route learning strategies: while some participants were very conservative in their route choices, always selecting the same route, other participants showed a high variability in their route choices. In the subsequent test phase we systematically varied the availability of local and global landmark information to gain first insights into the spatial knowledge underlying these different behavior. Participants showing high variability in route choices strongly depended on global landmark information. Moreover, participants who were conservative in their route choices were able to reproduce the basic form of the learned routes even without any local landmark information, suggesting that their route memory contained metric information. The results of this study suggest two alternative strategies for solving route learning and wayfinding tasks that are reflected in the spatial knowledge aquired during learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Janzen, G., Turennout, M.: Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience 7(6), 572–574 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohler, M., Wehner, R.: Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: How do they interact with path-integration vectors? Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 83, 1–12 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mallot, H., Gillner, S.: Route navigation without place recognition. what is recognized in recognition triggered responses? Perception 29, 43–55 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aginsky, V., Harris, C., Rensink, R., Beusmans, J.: Two strategies for learning a route in a driving simulator. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 317–331 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishikawa, T., Montello, D.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology 52, 93–129 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel, A., White, S.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and behavior 10, 9–55 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Restle, F.: Discrimination cues in mazes: A resolution of the ’place-vs-response’ question. Psychological Review 64(4), 217–228 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard, B., McNaughton, B.: Spatial representation in the rat conceptual behavioural and neurophysiological perspectives. In: Kessner, R., Olton, D.S. (eds.) Comparative Cognition and Neuroscience: Neurobiology of Comparative Cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, H., Naylor, S., Chechile, N.: Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory and Cognition 27, 309–319 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trullier, O., Wiener, S., Berthoz, A., Meyer, J.A.: Biologically based artificial navigation systems: review and prospects. Progress in Neurobiology 51(5), 483–544 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuipers, B.: The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence 119, 191–233 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillner, S., Mallot, H.: Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10, 445–463 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., Knauff, M.: Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies and multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(4), 284–299 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wehner, R., Boyer, M., Loertscher, F., Sommer, S., Menzi, U.: Ant navigation: One-way routes rather than maps. Current Biology 16, 75–79 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham, P., Collett, T.: Bi-directional route learning in wood ants. Journal of Experimental Biology 209, 3677–3684 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Judd, S., Collett, T.S.: Multiple stored views and landmark guidance in ants. Nature 392, 710–714 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diwadkar, V., McNamara, T.: Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science 8, 302–307 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Needleman, S., Wunsch, C.: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443–453 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Basten, K., Mallot, H.: Building blocks for trail analysis (in preparation, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gaunet, F., Vidal, M., Kemeny, A., Berthoz, A.: Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory. Cognitive Brain Research 11(3), 409–420 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Munzer, S., Zimmer, H., Schwalm, M., Baus, J., Aslan, I.: Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(4), 300–308 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bisch-Knaden, S., Wehner, R.: Landmark memories are more robust when acquired at the nest site than en route: experiments in desert ants. Naturwissenschaften 90, 127–130 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christou, C.G., Bülthoff, H.H.: View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory and Cognition 27(6), 996–1007 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christian Freksa Nora S. Newcombe Peter Gärdenfors Stefan Wölfl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hurlebaus, R., Basten, K., Mallot, H.A., Wiener, J.M. (2008). Route Learning Strategies in a Virtual Cluttered Environment. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds) Spatial Cognition VI. Learning, Reasoning, and Talking about Space. Spatial Cognition 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87600-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87601-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics