Skip to main content

Non-finite Axiomatizability and Undecidability of Interval Temporal Logics with C, D, and T

  • Conference paper
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5213))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Interval logics are an important area of computer science. Although attention has been mainly focused on unary operators, an early work by Venema (1991) introduced an expressively complete interval logic language called CDT, based on binary operators, which has many potential applications and a strong theoretical interest. Many very natural questions about CDT and its fragments, such as (non-)finite axiomatizability and (un-)decidability, are still open (as a matter of fact, only a few undecidability results, including the undecidability of CDT, are known). In this paper, we answer most of these questions, showing that almost all fragments of CDT, containing at least one binary operator, are neither finitely axiomatizable with standard rules nor decidable. A few cases remain open.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Börger, E., Grädel, E., Gurevich, Y.: The Classical Decision Problem. Perspectives of Mathematical Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman, H., Thompson, S.: A decision procedure and complete axiomatization of finite interval temporal logic with projection. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(2), 195–239 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: Tableau-based Decision Procedure for the Logic of Proper Subinterval Structures over Dense Orderings. In: Areces, C., Demri, S. (eds.) Proceedings of M4M-5: 5th International Workshop on Methods for Modalities, pp. 335–351 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: Tableau Systems for Logics of Subinterval Structures over Dense Orderings. In: Olivetti, N. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4548, pp. 73–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: On Decidability and Expressiveness of Propositional Interval Neighborhood Logics. In: Artemov, S.N., Nerode, A. (eds.) LFCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4514, pp. 84–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Propositional interval neighborhood logics: Expressiveness, decidability, and undecidable extensions. Technical Report 05, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Udine, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bresolin, D., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: An optimal tableau-based decision algorithm for Propositional Neighborhood Logic. In: Thomas, W., Weil, P. (eds.) STACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 549–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bresolin, D., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: An optimal decision procedure for Right Propositional Neighborhood Logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning 38(1-3), 173–199 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, C.C., Keisler, H.J.: Model theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabbay, D.M.: An irreflexive lemma with applications to axiomatization on linear frames. In: Aspects of Philosophical Logic, pp. 67–89 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Propositional interval neighborhood temporal logics. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9(9), 1137–1167 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: A road map of interval temporal logics and duration calculi. J. of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(1–2), 9–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G., Sala, P.: A general tableau method for propositional interval temporal logics: Theory and implementation. Journal of Applied Logic 4(3), 305–330 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwood, R.E., Gleason, A.M.: Combinatorial relations and chromatic graphs. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 7, 1–7 (1955)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Halpern, J., Shoham, Y.: A propositional modal logic of time intervals. Journal of the ACM 38(4), 935–962 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirsch, R., Hodkinson, I.: Relation algebras by games. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 147. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lodaya, K.: Sharpening the undecidability of interval temporal logic. In: He, J., Sato, M. (eds.) ASIAN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1961, pp. 290–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Maddux, R.: Relation algebras. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 150. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Monk, J.D.: Nonfinitizability of classes of representable cylindric algebras. Journal Symbolic Logic 34, 331–343 (1969)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Moszkowski, B.: Reasoning about digital circuits. Tech. rep. stan-cs-83-970, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roy, S., Sciavicco, G.: Completeness of chop. In: Guesguen, H.W., Ligozat, G., Rodriguez, R.V. (eds.) Proc. IJCAI 2007, pp. 90–95 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Venema, Y.: Expressiveness and completeness of an interval tense logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31(4), 529–547 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Venema, Y.: A modal logic for chopping intervals. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(4), 453–476 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael Kaminski Simone Martini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hodkinson, I., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G. (2008). Non-finite Axiomatizability and Undecidability of Interval Temporal Logics with C, D, and T. In: Kaminski, M., Martini, S. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5213. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87531-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87531-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87530-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87531-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics