Skip to main content

Superposition for Fixed Domains

  • Conference paper
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5213))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Superposition is an established decision procedure for a variety of first-order logic theories represented by sets of clauses. A satisfiable theory, saturated by superposition, implicitly defines a perfect term-generated model for the theory. Proving universal properties with respect to a saturated theory directly leads to a modification of the perfect model’s term-generated domain, as new Skolem functions are introduced. For many applications, this is not desired. Therefore, we propose the first superposition calculus that can explicitly represent existentially quantified variables and can thus compute with respect to a given domain. This calculus is sound and complete for a first-order fixed domain semantics. For some classes of formulas and theories, we can even employ the calculus to prove properties of the perfect model itself, going beyond the scope of known superposition based approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H.: Rewrite-based equational theorem proving with selection and simplification. Journal of Logic and Computation 4(3), 217–247 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachmair, L., Ganzinger, H., Waldmann, U.: Superposition with simplification as a decision procedure for the monadic class with equality. In: Mundici, D., Gottlob, G., Leitsch, A. (eds.) KGC 1993. LNCS, vol. 713, pp. 83–96. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouhoula, A.: Automated theorem proving by test set induction. J. Symb. Comp. 23(1), 47–77 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Caferra, R., Zabel, N.: A method for simultanous search for refutations and models by equational constraint solving. J. Symb. Comp. 13(6), 613–642 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Comon, H., Lescanne, P.: Equational problems and disunification. Journal of Symbolic Computation 7(3-4), 371–425 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Comon, H., Nieuwenhuis, R.: Induction = I-axiomatization + first-order consistency. Information and Computation 159(1/2), 151–186 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganzinger, H., Nivelle, H.D.: A superposition decision procedure for the guarded fragment with equality. In: Proc. of LICS 1999, pp. 295–305. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganzinger, H., Stuber, J.: Inductive theorem proving by consistency for first-order clauses. In: Rusinowitch, M., Remy, J.-L. (eds.) CTRS 1992. LNCS, vol. 656, pp. 226–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacquemard, F., Meyer, C., Weidenbach, C.: Unification in extensions of shallow equational theories. In: Nipkow, T. (ed.) RTA 1998. LNCS, vol. 1379, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacquemard, F., Rusinowitch, M., Vigneron, L.: Tree automata with equality constraints modulo equational theories. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 557–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapur, D., Narendran, P., Zhang, H.: Automating inductionless induction using test sets. Journal of Symbolic Computation 11(1/2), 81–111 (1991)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Nieuwenhuis, R.: Basic paramodulation and decidable theories (extended abstract). In: Proc. of LICS 1996, pp. 473–482. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nieuwenhuis, R., Rubio, A.: Paramodulation-based theorem proving. In: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, ch. 7, vol. I, pp. 371–443. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Peltier, N.: Model building with ordered resolution: extracting models from saturated clause sets. Journal of Symbolic Computation 36(1-2), 5–48 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Weidenbach, C.: Towards an automatic analysis of security protocols in first-order logic. In: Ganzinger, H. (ed.) CADE 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1632, pp. 314–328. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Weidenbach, C.: Combining superposition, sorts and splitting. In: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, ch. 27, vol. 2, pp. 1965–2012. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael Kaminski Simone Martini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horbach, M., Weidenbach, C. (2008). Superposition for Fixed Domains. In: Kaminski, M., Martini, S. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5213. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87531-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87531-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87530-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87531-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics