Ontology-Based Geospatial Data Query and Integration

  • Tian Zhao
  • Chuanrong Zhang
  • Mingzhen Wei
  • Zhong-Ren Peng
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5266)


Geospatial data sharing is an increasingly important subject as large amount of data is produced by a variety of sources, stored in incompatible formats, and accessible through different GIS applications. Past efforts to enable sharing have produced standardized data format such as GML and data access protocols such as Web Feature Service (WFS). While these standards help enabling client applications to gain access to heterogeneous data stored in different formats from diverse sources, the usability of the access is limited due to the lack of data semantics encoded in the WFS feature types. Past research has used ontology languages to describe the semantics of geospatial data but ontology-based queries cannot be applied directly to legacy data stored in databases or shapefiles, or to feature data in WFS services. This paper presents a method to enable ontology query on spatial data available from WFS services and on data stored in databases. We do not create ontology instances explicitly and thus avoid the problems of data replication. Instead, user queries are rewritten to WFS getFeature requests and SQL queries to database. The method also has the benefits of being able to utilize existing tools of databases, WFS, and GML while enabling query based on ontology semantics.


Inference Rule Resource Description Framework Mapping Rule Geospatial Data SPARQL Query 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Budak Arpinar, I., Sheth, A., Ramakrishnan, C., Usery, E.L., Azami, M., Kwan, M.-P.: Geospatial ontology development and semantic analytics. Transactions in GIS 10(4), 551–575 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Application. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baglioni, M., Masserotti, M.V., Renso, C., Spinsanti, L.: Building geospatial ontologies from geographical databases. In: Proceedings of GeoSpatial Semantics, the Second International Conference, pp. 195–209 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beeri, C., Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.-C.: Rewriting queries using views in description logics. In: PODS 1997: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pp. 99–108 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 34–43 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bishr, Y.: Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(4), 299–314 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bizer, C., Seaborne, A.: D2RQ -treating Non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, H., Wu, Z., Wang, H., Mao, Y.: RDF/RDFS-based relational database integration. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2006), p. 94 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choichi, J.: Constaint-based interoperability of spatiotemporal databases. Geoinformatica 3(3), 211–243 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cruz, I.F., Sunna, W., Chaudhry, A.: Semi-automatic ontology alignment for geospatial data integration. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freksa, C., Miller, H.J. (eds.) GIScience 2004. LNCS, vol. 3234, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OGC document 02-023r4. Geography Markup Language (GML), version 3.00 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    OGC document 04-024. Web Map Service, Version 1.3 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    OGC document 04-094. Web Feature Service, Version 1.1.0 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: AL-log: Integrating datalog and description logics. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(3), 227–252 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Egenhofer, M.: Toward the Semantic Geospatial Web. In: Tenth ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fabrikant, S.I., Buttenfield, B.P.: Formalizing semantic spaces for information access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    FGDC. National Spatial Data Infrastructure (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Agouris, P., Camara, G.: Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 6(3), 231–257 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hobona, G., Fairbairn, G.D., James, P.: Semantically-assisted geospatial workflow design. In: Proceedings of 15th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, November 2007, pp. 194–201 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Halevy, A.Y.: Theory of answering queries using views. SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data) 29(4), 40–47 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halevy, A.Y.: Answering queries using views: A survey. VLDB Journal: Very Large Data Bases 10(4), 270–294 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones, C.B., Abdelmoty, A.I., Finch, D., Fu, G., Vaid, S.: The SPIRIT spatial search engine: architecture, ontologies and spatial indexing. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Freksa, C., Miller, H.J. (eds.) GIScience 2004. LNCS, vol. 3234, pp. 25–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klien, E.: A rule-Based strategy for the semantic annotation of geodata. Transactions in GIS 11(3), 437–452 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: PODS 2002: Proceedings of the twenty-first ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, pp. 233–246 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levy, A.Y., Mendelzon, A.O., Sagiv, Y., Srivastava, D.: Answering queries using views. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 95–104 (1995)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for owl-dl with rules. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3(1), 41–60 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paul, M., Ghosh, S.K.: An approach for service oriented discovery and retrieval of spatial data. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Service-oriented software engineering, pp. 88–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peng, Z.-R.: A proposed framework for featurelevel geospatial data sharing: A case study for transportation network data. International Journal of Geographic Information Sciences 19(4), 459–481 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peng, Z.-R., Zhang, C.: The roles of geography markup language, scalable vector graphics, and web feature service specifications in the development of internet geographic information systems. Journal of Geographical Systems 6(2), 95–116 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Probst, F.: Ontological analysis of observations and measurements. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) GIScience 2006. LNCS, vol. 4197, pp. 304–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pundt, H., Bishr, Y.: Domain ontologies for data sharing - an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS. Computers and Geosciences 28(1), 95–102 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith, B., Mark, D.: Geographic categories: An ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 15(7), 591–612 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sterling, L., Shapiro, E.: The Art of Prolog. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, C., Li, W.: The roles of Web Feature and Web Map Services in real time geospatial data sharing for time-critical applications. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32(4), 269–283 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, C., Li, W., Peng, Z.-R., Day, M.: GML-based interoperable geographical database. Cartography 32(2), 1–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang, C., Li, W., Zhao, T.: Geospatial data sharing based on geospatial semantic web technologies. Journal of Spatial Science 52(2), 35–49 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tian Zhao
    • 1
  • Chuanrong Zhang
    • 2
  • Mingzhen Wei
    • 3
  • Zhong-Ren Peng
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceUniv. of Wisconsin – MilwaukeeMilwaukee 
  2. 2.Dept. of Geography & the Center for Environmental Sciences and EngineeringUniv. of ConnecticutStorrs 
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyRolla 
  4. 4.Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Transportation EngineeringUniv. of Florida, Tongji UniversityGainesville, ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations