Skip to main content

Digital Slide and Virtual Microscopy-Based Routine and Telepathology Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Biopsy Specimen

  • Chapter
Book cover Telepathology

Aims: Evaluation of a recently developed digital slide scanning and virtual microscope (VM) system and its comparison with optical microscopy on routine gastric biopsy specimen in local and remote access mode.

Methods: A digital slide scanning system was used (Mirax Scan 3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). The scanning program included label area barcode identification, object detection, autofocus, and image compression algorithms. The overall hard-disk place for a gastric biopsy was between 30 and 50 megabytes and the scanning time was between 2 and 4 min. H/E-stained routine gastric (61) and colon (42) biopsy specimen were selected, scanned, and evaluated by two specialists on an optical microscope (OM) and a VM.

Results: The overall concordance of VM to a consensus diagnosis (CON) was 96.1% and that of the OM to a CON was 97%. The clinically important concordances were 97% and 98%, respectively. The two methods showed concordance in 93% and clinically important concordance in 95%. The reasons of the discordance were interpretation difference (four cases) and insufficient clinical information (three cases). Remote evaluation of the digital slides through Internet shows the combined advantages of the previously used static and dynamic telepathology methods.

Conclusions: At present, scanning speed and automation of scanning are already here for routine application on gastrointestinal biopsy specimen. Digital slide and the VM are ready for the computerization of the histology laboratory and in teleconsultation services. Our partial study proved the immediate opportunity for the application in gastrointestinal specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson TL, Nelson AC (1995) Quality control and proficiency testing of cytological smear screening: an integrated approach using automation. In: Wied GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, Somrak TM, Vooijs GP (eds) Compendium on quality assurance, proficiency testing and workload limitations on clinical cytology. Tutorials of Cytology, Chicago, IL, pp. 83 –287

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker RW, Wadsworth J, Brugal G, Coleman DV (1998) An evaluation of “rapid review ” as a method of quality control of cervical smears using the AxioHOME microscope. Cytopa-thology 8:85 –95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belhomme P, Elmoataz A, Herlin P, Bloyet D (1996) Generalised region growing operator with optimal scanning: application to segmentation of breast cancer images. J Microsc 886:41 –50

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burns BF (1997) Creating low power photomicrographs using a 35 mm digital slide scanner. Am J Surg Pathol 21:865 –866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dee FR (2006) Virtual microscopy for comparative pathology. Toxicol Pathol 34:966 –973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dictor M (1997) The surgical pathologist in a client/server computer network: work support, quality assurance, and the graphical user interface. Mod Pathol 10:259 –266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dooley RL, Engel C, Muller ME (1997) Automated scanning and digitizing of roentgeno-graphs for documentation and research. Clin Orthop 274:113 –119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn BE, Almagro UA, Choi H, et al (1997) Dynamic-robotic telepathology: department of Veteran Affairs feasibility. Hum Pathol 28:8 –12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eusebi V, Foschini L, Erde S, et al (1997) Transcontinental consults in surgical pathology via the Internet. Hum Pathol 28:13 –16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Firestone L, Cook K, Culp K (1991) Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy. Cytometry 12:195 –206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gombas P, Szende B, Stotz G (1996) Support by telecommunications in diagnostic pathology. Experience with the first telepathology system in Hungary. Orv Hetilap 137:2299 –2303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grohs DH, Gombrich PP, Domanik RA (1996) AccuMed International, Inc. Meeting the challenges in cervical cancer screening: the AcCell Series 2000 automated slide handling and data management system. Acta Cytol 40:26 –30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grohs DH, Dadeshidze VV, Domanik RA, Gombrich PP, Olsson LJ, Pressman NJ (1997) Utility of the TracCell system in mappingPapanicolaou-stained cytologic material. Acta Cytol 41:144 –152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hailey DM, Lea R (1995) Prospects for newer technologies in cervical cancer screening programmes. J Qual Clin Pract 15:139 –145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Helin HO, Lundin ME, Laakso M, Lundin J, Helin HJ, Isola J (2006) Virtual microscopy in prostate histopathology: simultaneous viewing of biopsies stained sequentially with hematoxylin and eosin, and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase/p63 immunohisto-chemistry. J Urol 175:459 –504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leong FJWM, McGee O 'D (2001) Automated complete slide digitization: a medium for simultaneous viewing by multiple pathologists. J Pathol 195:508 –514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mango LJ, Ivasauskas EZ (1995) Computer assisted cervical cytology using the PAPNET testing. In: Wied GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, Schenck U, Somrak TM, Vooijs GP (eds) Compendium on quality assurance, proficiency testing and workload limitations on clinical cytology. Tutorials of Cytology, Chicago, IL, pp. 155 –167

    Google Scholar 

  18. O 'Brien MJ, Sotnikov AV (1996) Digital imaging in anatomic pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 106:25 –32

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ong SH, Jin XC, Sinniah R (1996) Image analysis of tissue sections. Comput Biol Med 26:269 –279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ott SR (1997) Acquisition of high-resolution digital images in video microscopy: automated image mosaicking on a desktop microcomputer. Microsc Res Tech 38:335 –343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shotton DM (1995) Robert Feulgen Prize Lecture 1995. Electronic light microscopy: present capabilities and future prospects. Histochem Cell Biol 104:97 –137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.Singson RPC, Natarajan S, Greenson JK, Marchevsky AM (1999) Virtual microscopy and the Internet as telepathology consultation tools. A study of gastrointestinal biopsy specimens. Am J Pathol 111:792 –795

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart J III, Myazaki K, Bevans-Wilkins K (2007) Virtual microscopy for cytology proficiency testing: are we there yet? Cancer 111:203 –212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weinberg DS (1996) How is telepathology being used to improve patient care. Clin Chem 42:831 –835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberg DS, Allaert FA, Dusserre P, et al (1996) Telepathology diagnosis by means of digital still images: an international validation study. Hum Pathol 27:111 –118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein RS (1996) Prospects for telepathology. Hum Pathol 17:433 –434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinstein RS, Battacharayya AK, Graham AR, et al (1997) Telepathology a ten-year progress report. Hum Pathol 28:1 –7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molnar, B., Berczi, L., Ficsor, L., Varga, V., Tagscherer, A., Tulassay, Z. (2009). Digital Slide and Virtual Microscopy-Based Routine and Telepathology Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Biopsy Specimen. In: Kumar, S., Dunn, B.E. (eds) Telepathology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85786-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85786-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85785-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85786-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics