Skip to main content

Word Sense Disambiguation as the Primary Step of Ontology Integration

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The recommendable primary step of ontology integration is annotation of ontology components with entries from WordNet or other dictionary sources in order to disambiguate their meaning. This paper presents an approach to automatically disambiguating the meaning of OWL ontology classes by providing sense annotation from WordNet. A class name is disambiguated using the names of the related classes, by comparing the taxonomy of the ontology with the portions of the WordNet taxonomy corresponding to all possible meanings of the class. The equivalence of the taxonomies is expressed by a probability function called affinity function. We apply two different basic techniques to compute the affinity coefficients: one based on semantic similarity calculation and the other on analyzing overlaps between word definitions and hyponyms. A software prototype is provided to evaluate the approach, as well as to determine which of the two disambiguation techniques produces better results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agirre, E., Edmonds, P. (eds.): Word Sense Disambiguation - Algorithms and Applications. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumueller, D., Do, H.H., Massmann, S., Rahm, E.: Schema and Ontology Matching with COMA++. In: Özcan, F. (ed.) Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 906–908. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: H-MATCH: an Algorithm for Dynamically Matching Ontologies in Peer-based Systems. In: Cruz, I.F., Kashyap, V., Decker, S., Eckstein, R. (eds.) Proc. 1st Int. Wshp on Sem. Web and Databases, pp. 231–250 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: Proc. 11th Int. WWW Conf., pp. 662–673. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-Based Ontology Alignment in OWL-Lite. In: López de Mántaras, R., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proc. 16th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 333–337. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fellbaum, C. (ed.): WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, S., Yu, C.T., Meng, W.: Word Sense Disambiguation in Queries. In: Herzog, O., et al. (eds.) Proc. 2005 ACM Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 525–532. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E.: Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. In: Apers, P.M.G., et al. (eds.) Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, pp. 49–58. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patel, C.O., Supekar, K., Lee, Y.: OntoGenie: Extracting Ontology Instances from WWW. In: Proc ISWC 2003 Workshop on Human Language Technology for the Semantic Web and Web Services, pp. 123–126 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Udrea, O., Getoor, L., Miller, R.J.: Leveraging Data and Structure in Ontology Integration. In: Chan, C.Y., Ooi, B.C., Zhou, A. (eds.) Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 449–460. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Wide Web Consortium: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (W3C Recommendation, February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, D., Powers, D.M.W.: Measuring Semantic Similarity in the Taxonomy of WordNet. In: Estivill-Castro, V. (ed.) Proc. 28th Australian Computer Science Conference, pp. 315–322. Australian Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Infectious Disease Ontology, http://www.duke.edu/~lgcowell/IDO_Workshop_Files/IDO.9.19.07.owl

  16. Stanford University Computer Ontology, http://ksl.stanford.edu/DAML/computers.owl

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sourav S. Bhowmick Josef Küng Roland Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Banek, M., Vrdoljak, B., Tjoa, A.M. (2008). Word Sense Disambiguation as the Primary Step of Ontology Integration. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85653-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85654-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics