Skip to main content

Extending Inconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking by Semantic Query Optimization

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The premise that all integrity constraints be totally satisfied guarantees the correctness of methods for simplified integrity checking, and of semantic query optimization. This premise can be waived for many integrity checking methods. We study how it can be relaxed also for applying semantic query optimization to an inconsistency-tolerant evaluation of simplified constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L.E., Chomicki, J.: Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases. In: Proc. 18th PODS, pp. 68–79. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chakravarthy, U.S., Grant, J., Minker, J.: Logic-based approach to semantic query optimization. ACM Trans. on Database Syst (TODS) 15(2), 162–207 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen, H., Martinenghi, D.: On simplification of database integrity constraints. Fundam. Inform. 71(4), 371–417 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, H., Martinenghi, D.: Classifying Integrity Checking Methods with regard to Inconsistency Tolerance. In: Proc. 10th PPDP. ACM Press, New York (to appear, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Decker, H., Martinenghi, D.: A relaxed approach to integrity and inconsistency in databases. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4246, pp. 287–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, A., Sagiv, Y., Ullman, J.D., Widom, J.: Constraint checking with partial information. In: Proc. 13th PODS, pp. 45–55 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martinenghi, D., Christiansen, H., Decker, H.: Integrity checking and maintenance in relational and deductive databases and beyond. In: Ma, Z. (ed.) Intelligent Databases: Technologies and Applications, pp. 238–285. Idea Group (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nicolas, J.-M.: Logic for improving integrity checking in relational data bases. Acta Informatica 18, 227–253 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramakrishnan, R., Gehrke, J.: Database Management Systems, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sourav S. Bhowmick Josef Küng Roland Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Decker, H. (2008). Extending Inconsistency-Tolerant Integrity Checking by Semantic Query Optimization. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85654-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85653-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85654-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics