Skip to main content

Statistical Assessment of MSigDB Gene Sets in Colon Cancer

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2008)

Abstract

Gene expression profiling offers a great opportunity for understanding the key role of genes in alterations which drive a normal cell to a cancer state. A deep understanding of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis can be reached focusing on deregulation of gene sets or pathways. We measure the amount of deregulation and assess the statistical significance of predefined pathways belonging to MSigDB collection in a colon cancer data set. To measure the relevance of the pathways we use two well-established methods: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) [7] and Gene List Analysis with Prediction Accuracy (GLAPA) [8]. We found that pathways associated to different diseases are strictly connected with colon cancer. Our study highlights the importance of using gene sets genes for understanding the main biological processes and pathways involved in colorectal cancer. Our analysis shows that many of the genes involved in these pathways are strongly associated to colorectal tumorigenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schena, M., et al.: Science (270), 467–470 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Storey, J.D., et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (100), 9440–9445 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashburner, M., et al.: Nat. Genet. (25), 25–29 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kanehisa, M., et al.: Nucleic Acids Res. (30), 42–46 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khatri, P., et al.: Genomics 79(2), 266–270 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bild, A.H., et al.: Nature 19(439), 353–357 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Subramanian, A., et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (102), 15545–15550 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maglietta, R., et al.: Bioinformatics 23(16), 2063–2072 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Creighton, C.J., et al.: PLoS ONE 3(3), 1816 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elzagheid, A., et al.: World J. Gastroenterol. 12(27), 4304–4309 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ancona, N., et al.: BMC Bioinformatics 387(7) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Good, P., et al.: Springer, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mariadason, J.M., et al.: Cancer Res. 60(16), 4561–4572 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Emoto, K., et al.: Cancer (92), 1419–1426 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morris, E.J., et al.: PLoS Genetics 2(11), 1834–1848 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Okazazi, H., et al.: J. Lab. Clin. Med. 143(3), 169–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Durrant, L.G., et al.: Cancer Immunol. Immunother. (52) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skrzydlewska, E., et al.: Hepatogastroenterology 50(49), 126–131 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, K.A., et al.: Carcinogenesis 28(1), 71–80 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greco, C., et al.: Anticancer Res. 21(5), 3185–3192 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Seidler, H.B.K., et al.: Experimental and Molecular Pathology (76), 224–233 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han, J., et al.: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 82(7), 481–483 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faviana, P., et al.: Oncol. Rep. 9(3), 617–620 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Edelman, E., et al.: PLoS Computational Biology 4(2), 28 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanahan, D., et al.: Cell (100), 57–70 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Rifkin, R., Yeo, G., Poggio, T.: Advances in Learning Theary: Methods, Model and Applications. In: Suykens, H., Basu, M., Vandewalle, A. (eds.) NATO Science Series III: Computer and Systems Science, vol. 190, pp. 131–153. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ignac Lovrek Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Distaso, A. et al. (2008). Statistical Assessment of MSigDB Gene Sets in Colon Cancer. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5178. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85565-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85565-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85564-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85565-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics