Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI of the Anus

  • Chapter
MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Key Points

This chapter will detail the clinical utility of MRI of the anus. The main emphasis will be on fistula-in-ano, where MRI is extensively used because it is generally accepted to be the reference standard investigation, surpassing even surgical assessment. The pathogenesis of fistula-in-ano is described, along with the different types of fistula encountered and the principles of surgical treatment. We describe how fistula-in-ano may be imaged with MR and emphasize that precise Preoperative characterization of the anatomical course of the fistula and all associated infection is critical, if surgery is to be most effective. We also detail other clinical scenarios where MRI of the anus has particular clinical utility, namely investigation of anal incontinence and anal malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, van der Hoop AG, et al (2001) Imaging of anal fistulas: does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218:75–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor ACJ, et al (2003) Response of fistulating Crohn's disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briel JW, Stoker J, Rociu E, et al (1999) External anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging adversely affects continence after sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 86:1322–1327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan G, Halligan S, Bartram CI, et al (2004) Clinical examination, endosonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano: comparison to an outcome derived reference standard. Radiology 233:674–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, et al (2002) Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 360:1661–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB, et al (2003a) Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula in ano. Br J Surg 90:877–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan GN, Williams AB, Bartram CI, et al (2003b) Potential clinical implications of direction of a trans-sphincteric anal fistula track. Br J Surg 90:1250–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiari H (1878) Uber die analen divertikel der rectum-schleimhaut und ihre beziehung zu den anal fisteln. Wien Med Press 19:1482–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, MacIver DK, et al (1997) High resolution MR imaging of the anal sphincter in children: a pilot study using endoanal receiver coils. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobben AC, Terra M P, Slors JF, et al (2007) External anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: comparison of endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US. Radiology 242:463–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fucini C (1991) One stage treatment of anal abscesses and fistulae. Int J Colorect Dis 6:12–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Bartram CI. (1998) MR imaging of fistula in ano: are endoanal coils the gold standard? AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:407–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Buchanan G (2003) Imaging fistula-in-ano. Eur J Radiol 42:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan S, Stoker J (2006) Imaging fistula-in-ano: state-of-the-art. Radiology 239:18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S, et al (2009) Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology 251:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain SM, Stoker J, Schouten WR, et al (1996) Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification. Radiology 200:475–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett ME, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to obstetric anal sphincter damage. Dis Colon Rectum 51:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koelbel G, Schmiedl U Majer MC, et al (1989) Diagnosis of fistulae and sinus tracts in patients with Crohn disease: value of MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 152:999–1003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koh DM, Dzik-Jurasz A, O'Neill B, et al (2008) Pelvic phasedarray MR imaging of anal carcinoma before and after chemoradiation. Br J Radiol 81:91–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law PJ, Bartram CI. (1989) Anal endosonography. Technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 14:349–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lilius HG (1968) Investigation of human foetal anal ducts and intramuscular glands and a clinical study of 150 patients. Acta Chir Scand Supp 383:88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunniss PJ, Armstrong P, Barker PG, et al (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulae. Lancet 340:394–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, et al (2000) Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:741–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parks AG (1961) The pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J 5224:463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula –in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reay Jones NH, Healy JC, King LJ, et al (2003) Pelvic connective tissue resilience decreases with vaginal delivery, menopause and uterine prolapse. Br J Surg 90:466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, et al (1999) Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 212:453–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population: incidence and epidemiological aspects. Acta Chir Gynaecol 73:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al (2002) The natural history of fistulizing Crohn's disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 122:875–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM et al (2001) A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology 121:1064–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, et al (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:403–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JA, Ward J, Beckingham IJ, Adams C, Ambrose NS (1996) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of perianal fistulas. Am J Roentgenol 167:735–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, et al (1993) Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. New Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2003) Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology 226:662–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van Der Hulst V P, et al (2005) Anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: endo-anal versus external phased-array MR imaging. Radiology 236:886–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Beets-Tan RG, van der Hulst VP, et al (2006) MRI in evaluating atrophy of the external sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:991–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terra MP, Deutekom M, Beets-Tan RG, et al (2006) Relationship between external anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical, functional, and anatomic characteristics in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:668–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, et al (1998) Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 352:105–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, et al (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery using three-dimensional endosonography. Obstet Gynecol 97(5 Pt 1):770

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Specialist Radiology, University College London, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK

    Steve Halligan & Stuart A. Taylor

Authors
  1. Steve Halligan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stuart A. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, AZ, 1105, The Netherlands

    J. Stoker (Professor of Radiology) (Professor of Radiology)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halligan, S., Taylor, S.A. (2010). MRI of the Anus. In: Stoker, J. (eds) MRI of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85532-3_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85531-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85532-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation