Skip to main content

Surplus of Graphs and the Lovász Local Lemma

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies ((BSMS,volume 19))

Abstract

The Surplus is a game-theoretic graph parameter. To illustrate it in a special case, suppose that two players, called Maker and Breaker, are playing on an n×n chessboard, and alternately mark previously unmarked little squares. Maker uses (say) mark X and Breaker uses (say) O, exactly like in Tic-Tac-Toe; Maker’s goal is to achieve a large lead in some line, where a “line” means either a row or a column. Let \( \frac{n} {2} + \Delta \) denote the maximum number of Xs (“Maker’s mark”) in some line at the end of a play; then the difference \( \left( {\frac{n} {2} + \Delta } \right) - \left( {\frac{n} {2} - \Delta } \right) = 2\Delta \) is Maker’s lead; Maker wants to maximize Δ = Δ(n). Since Δ = Δ = Δ(n) can be a half-integer (it happens when n is odd), and it is customary to work with integral graph parameters (like chromatic number), I prefer to call 2Δ = 2Δ(n) the Surplus of the n×n board (and refer to Δ = Δ(n) as the half-surplus). That is, the Surplus is the maximum terminal lead that Maker can always achieve against a perfect opponent. (In other words, Surplus is a game-theoretic one-sided discrepancy concept.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Beck, Van der Waerden and Ramsey type games, Combinatorica, 2 (1981), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Beck, Deterministic graph games and a probabilistic intuition, Combinat. Probab. Comput., 3 (1993), 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Beck, Combinatorial Games: Tic-Tac-Toe Theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 114, Cambridge University Press 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Erdős and L. Lovász, Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions, in: Infinite and Finite Sets (eds.: A. Hajnal et al.), Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, 11, North-Holland, (Amsterdam, 1975), 609–627.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Erdős and A. Rényi, On the evolution of random graphs, Mat. Kutató Int. Közl., 5 (1960), 17–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Erdős and J. Selfridge, On a combinatorial game, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 14 (1973), 298–301.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. St. J. A. Nash-Williams, Edge-disjoint spanning trees of finite graphs, Journ. London Math. Soc., 36 (1961), 445–450; see also Journ. London Math. Soc., 39 (1964), 12.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. A. Székely, On two concepts of discrepancy in a class of combinatorial games, in: Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 37 “Finite and Infinite Sets”, North-Holland (Eger, Hungary, 1981), 679–683.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 János Bolyai Mathematical Society and Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beck, J. (2008). Surplus of Graphs and the Lovász Local Lemma. In: Grötschel, M., Katona, G.O.H., Sági, G. (eds) Building Bridges. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85221-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics