Abstract
The paper addresses the issue of measuring web accessibility in such a way that differences in measurements reflect differences in the effectiveness experienced by disabled users. The paper presents the steps upon which a measuring methodology called MAMBO is based, and the data that are needed to compute the indexes, in addition to its conceptual rationale. An experimentation of MAMBO is then described, based on analysis of 14 accessibility reports; results are shown and discussed, including the effects that different severity judgments may have on the metric, how to estimate confidence intervals on the values, and how the metric can be used to estimate accessibility with respect to specific user groups.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Quantitative metrics for web accessibility evaluation. In: Proc. of the ICWE 2005 Workshop on Web Metrics and Measurement (2005)
Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Web accessibility awareness in search engines results. Int. Journal on Universal Access in the Information Society (2008); In press
Bailey, J., Burd, E.: Tree-map visualization for web accessibility. In: COMPSAC 2005: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2005), vol. 1, pp. 275–280. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005)
Brajnik, G.: Web Accessibility Testing: When the Method is the Culprit. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 156–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Brajnik, G., Lomuscio, R.: SAMBA: a semi-automatic method for measuring barriers of accessibility. In: Trewin, S., Pontelli, E. (eds.) 9th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS, Tempe, AZ, October 2007. ACM Press, New York (2007)
Brajnik, G.: Web accessibility testing with barriers walkthrough (March 2006) (Visited May 2008), www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio/projects/bw
DRC. Formal investigation report: web accessibility. Disability Rights Commission (March 2006) (Visited January 2006), www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/report.asp
Gray, W.D., Salzman, M.C.: Damaged merchandise: a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human–Computer Interaction 13(3), 203–261 (1998)
Sears, A.: Heuristic walkthroughs: finding the problems without the noise. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 9(3), 213–234 (1997)
Slatin, J., Rush, S.: Maximum Accessibility: Making Your Web Site More Usable for Everyone. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Sullivan, T., Matson, R.: Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the web’s most popular sites. In: Proc. of ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 139–144 (2000)
Velleman, E., Velasco, C.A., Snaprud, M., Burger, D.: D-WAB4 Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM 1.0). Technical report, WAB Cluster (2006)
W3C/WAI. How people with disabilities use the web. World Wide Web Consortium — Web Accessibility Initiative (March 2004), http://w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/20040302.html
Zeng, X.: Evaluation of Enhancement of Web Content Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brajnik, G. (2008). Measuring Web Accessibility by Estimating Severity of Barriers. In: Hartmann, S., Zhou, X., Kirchberg, M. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2008 Workshops. WISE 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85199-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85200-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)