Skip to main content

Abstract

CFD methods have been employed to solve a number of efficiency, safety and operational problems related to the aerodynamics of rail cars and locomotives. This paper reviews three case studies: 1) numerical models were employed to quantify the drag characteristics of two external railcar features; namely, well car side-posts and inter-platform gaps. The effects of various design modifications on train resistance and fuel usage were evaluated. 2) An operational safety issue facing railroad operators is wind-induced tip-over. A study was completed using CFD and wind tunnel tests to develop a database of tip-over tendencies for a variety of car types within the Norfolk Southern fleet. The use of this database in the development of a speed restricting system for the Sandusky Bay Bridge is also discussed. 3) Another safety issue involves the behavior of diesel exhaust plumes in the vicinity of locomotive cabs. Numerical simulations were performed for a variety of locomotives operating under a number of ambient conditions (wind speed, wind direction). The concentration of diesel exhaust at the operator cab window was quantified. Where appropriate, the studies provide information on the correlation of the CFD results with previously collected wind tunnel and field data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson D., Tannehill J and Pletcher R, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, Washington, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wesseling P, Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. McCallen R, Browand F and Ross J (Editors), The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, New York, Springer-Verlag, 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hucho W (Editor), Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, Fourth Edition, Society of Automotive Engineer, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson R and Banka A, VISCOUS Users Guide, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Patankar S, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, New York, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. FLUENT 6.3 User’s Manual, Lebanon, New Hampshire, ANSYS, >Inc., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Launder B and Spalding D, Mathematical Models of Turbulence, New York, Academic Press, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Launder B and Spalding D, “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flow”, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 3, 1974, p. 269.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed S, “Some Applications of RANS Methods”, Section 15.6.3.2, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Chapter 15, Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, Hucho, W. H. (Editor), Fourth Edition, Society of Automotive Engineer, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis H, The Pictorial Encyclopedia of Railways, New York, Hamlyn Publishing Corporation, 1968, pp. 12-30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume I – Wind Tunnel Test of Containers and Trailers on Flatcars”, U. S. Department of Commerce, NTIS PB-264 304, December 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi P, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume II – Full-Scale Aerodynamic Validation Tests of Trailer-On-A-Flat-Car (Series II)”, U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS PB-281 823, March 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume III – Correlation Report, Full Scale Trailers on Flat Cars and Comparison with Wind Tunnel Results”, U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS PB-288 137, September 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume IV – Wind Tunnel Tests of Freight Cars and New Trailer and Container Car Designs”, U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS PB80-174 899, June 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Various Configurations of Railroad Cars for Carrying Trailers and Containers. Wind Tunnel Tests of Six Scale Model Configurations”, U. S. Department of Commerce, NTIS PB80-174881, January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Arnold G, “Synopsis, Full-Scale Aero-Drag-Measuring Gondola Car”, Workshop on the Aerodynamic Drag of Trains, Derbyshire College of Higher Education, Derby, U.K., April 7-9, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Gawthorp R, “Aerodynamics of Trains in the Open Air”, Railway Engineer International, Volume 3, No. 3, May-June 1978, pp. 7-12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Dayman D, “Demonstration of the Coast-Down Technique for Determining Train Resistances”, Final Report, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, Publication No. 83-85, October 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Goss W, “Atmosphere Resistance to the Motion of Railway Trains”, The Engineer, 1898 (conducted at Purdue University).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hoerner S, “Efficiency of Railroad Trains”, Fluid Dynamic Drag, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Brick Town, New Jersey, 1965, pp. 12-10 to 12-15.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Tietjens O and Ripley K, “Air Resistance of High-Speed Trains and Interurban Cars”, Transactions ASME, Vol. 54 (APM-54-23), 1932, pp. 235-251.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Davis W, “The Traction Resistance of Electric Locomotives and Cars”, General Electric Review, Vol. 29, October 1926, pp. 685-707.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hay W, Railroad Engineering, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1982, pp. 69-89.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Engdahl R, Gielow R and Paul J, “Train Resistance – Aerodynamics, Volume I of II, Intermodal Car Aerodynamics”, Association of American Railroads, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Paul J, Gielow R, Holmes A and Hickey P, “Reduction of Intermodal Car Aerodynamic Drag through Computerized Flow Simulation”, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Paper 83-RT-4, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Arad U, The 1973-1974 Arab Oil Embargo: Facts, Figures and Analysis, Washington, D.C., Hudson Institute, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Widjaja D, Scofield J, Holmes A and Gielow R, “An Application of Airflow Modeling Methods to the Santa Fe 10-Pack Fuel Foiler”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-80-004, 1 October 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume MacFadyen A, Widjaja D, Holmes A, Paul J and Gielow R, “An Aerodynamic Drag Comparison of Streamlined and Conventional Locomotives Utilizing Numerical Airflow Simulation Methods”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-81-011, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hickey P, MacFadyen A, Holmes A, Paul J and Gielow R, “An Aerodynamic Analysis of the Trailer Train Company 4-Runner Intermodal Car Using Numerical Flow Simulation Methods”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-82-005, 7 May 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Hickey P, Gielow R, Holmes A and Paul J, “Aerodynamic Drag Analysis of the Lo-Pac 2000 Intermodal Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-82-011, 15 September 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammitt A, “Aerodynamic Forces on Freight Trains, Volume Gielow R, Holmes A and Paul J, “Aerodynamic Drag Analysis of the Ortner 100-Ton Rapid Discharge Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-82-014, 15 December 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hickey P, Gielow R, Holmes A and Paul J, “Aerodynamic Modifications to the Budd Lo-Pac 2000 Intermodal Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-83-001, 31 January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hickey P, Holmes A, Paul J and Gielow R, “Aerodynamic Design Study of an Aluminum Gondola Car for Pullman Standard”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-83-005, 1 April 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hickey P, Gielow R and Paul J, “An Aerodynamic Treatment Package for the Ortner Four Pocket Rapid Discharge Coal Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-83-013, 5 August 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paul J, Smith T, Gielow M and Gielow R, “ 3/10 Scale Wind Tunnel Test of Skeletonized and Well-Type Intermodal Rail Cars”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-83-019, 1 October 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paul J, Nelson R, Groesbeck P, Polihonki D, Banka A, Keeler D and Gielow R, “3/10 Scale Hopper and Gondola Rail Car Wind Tunnel Test”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-84-019, 28 December 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Paul J and Gielow R, “Aerodynamic Enhancements of the Trailer Train Front Runner Single Platform Rail Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-84-009, 1 June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gielow R, Keeler D, Polihonki D, deJager D and Paul J, “16% Scale Gondola, Locomotive, and 89 Foot Car Wind Tunnel Test”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-85-011, 31 January 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Engdahl R, Gielow R and Paul J, “Train Resistance – Aerodynamics, Volume II of II, Open Top Car Applications”, Association of American Railroads, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Furlong C, Gielow M., Gielow R Paul J and Nelson R, “Results of Wind Tunnel and Full-Scale Tests Conducted from 1983 t 1987 in Support of The Association of American Railroad’s Train Energy Program”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report Number R-88-010, 30 December 1988, AAR Report R-685.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Furlong C, Gielow R, Paul J and Nelson R, “Aerodynamic Subroutine User’s Guide, Train Aerodynamics Simulator”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-88-003, 15 July 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Polihonki D, Paul J and Banka A, “An Aerodynamic Optimization of the Front End Design for a Proposed Euroshuttle Train Double Deck Loader”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-90-003, 15 January 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson R, “Fuel Consumption Analysis of Various Railcars”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-94-GB1-4, 12 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson R, “Auto Hauler Fuel Consumption Analysis”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-98-GBC-1, 28 April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  46. zohnson R, “Wind Tunnel Results of a 16%-Scale Partitioned Gondola Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-04-ICE-1, 15 December 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson R, “CFD Analysis of Smooth-Side (Husky-Stack 53) and Side Post 53 Foot Well Cars”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-06-GB5-3, 29 November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson R, “Coal Car Aerodynamics”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Reports L-06-BNS-1 and L-07-BNS-1, 5 December 2006 and 18 April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson R, “Maxi-X AP1 and Maxi-X MS Fuel Consumption Results”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-94-GBI-1, 24 June 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Watkins S, Saunders J and Kumar H, “Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of Goods Trains”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics", Vol. 40 (1992) pp. 147-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Saunders J, Watkins S and Cassar R., “Vortex Optimisation of Slotted Tops and Cavities of Two Different Open Rail Wagons”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 49 (1993), pp. 421-430.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Johnson R, “CFD Analysis of Enhanced HS 40X US Well Car”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-07-GB3-1, 27 February 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Matschke G, Tielkes T, Deeg P and Schulte-Werning B, “Effects of Strong Cross Winds on High-Speed Trains – A Risk Assessment Approach”, International Association for Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM5 Conference, Osaka, Japan, 27 November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Andersson E, Haggstrom J, Sima M and Stichel S, “Assessment of Train-Overturning Risk Due to Strong Cross-Winds”, Proceedings of the I MECH E Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Volume 21 B, Number 3, 1 September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sanquer S, Barre C, Dufresne de Virel M and Cleon L, “Effects of Cross Winds on High-Speed Trains: Development of a New Experimental Methodology”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 92, Issues 7-8, June 2004, pp. 535-545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. MacNeill R, Holmes S and Lee H, “Measurement of the Aerodynamic Pressures Produced by Passing Trains”, Proceedings of the 2002 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, Washington, DC, 23-25 April 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Holmes S, Toma E and Schroeder M, “High-Speed Passenger and Intercity Train Aerodynamic Computer Modeling”, Proceedings of ME2000, The 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Orlando, Florida, 5-10 November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hoppmann U, Koenig S, Tilkes T and Matschke G, “A Short-Term Strong Wind Prediction Model for Railway Application; Design and Verification”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 90, 2002, pp. 1127-1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Polihonki D, Paul J, Gielow R and Nelson R, “An Aerodynamic Evaluation of the Front End Design for a Bombardier Mass Transit Division Proposed Euroshuttle Train Double Deck Loader (DDL) Wagon, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-90-003, 15 January 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gielow M, Polihonki D, Gielow R Paul J and Nelson R, “A Train-Speed-Restricting System to Achieve Safe Operations under High Wind Conditions Along Certain Union Pacific Routes”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-88-006, 26 August 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Johnson R, “Auto-Max Tip-Over Analysis”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report L-98-GB1-1, 12 August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Johnson R and Nelson R, “Norfolk Southern Company Sandusky Bay Speed Restricting System”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation, Report R-06-NF1-1, 3 April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Paul J, Groesbeck P, Gielow M, Keeler D, Banka A and Gielow R, “Southern Pacific Transportation Company 3/10 Scale Double-Stack Container Car Wind Tunnel Test”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-84-015, 4 October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Peters J, “How to Reduce the Cross Wind Sensitivity of Trains”, The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, McCallen, R., Browand, F., and Ross, J. (Editors), New York, Springer-Verlag, 2004, pp. 453-467.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bhatia R, Lopipero P and Smith A, “Diesel Exhaust Exposure and Lung Cancer”, Epidemiology, Vol. 9 (1), January 1998, pp. 84-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Nauss K, “Diesel Exhaust: A Critical Analysis of Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects; Summary of a Health Effects Institute (HEI) Special Report: HEI Diesel Working Group”, Cambridge, Massachusetts, DieselNet Technical Report, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Woskie S, Smith T, Hammond S, Schenker M, Garshick E and Speizer F, “Estimation of the Diesel Exposures of Railroad Workers: I. Current Exposures”, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 13, 1988, pp. 381-394.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Woskie S, Smith T, Hammond S, Schenker M, Garshick E and Speizer F, “Estimation of the Diesel Exhaust Exposures of Railroad Workers: II. National and Historical Perspectives”, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 13, 1988, pp. 395-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Correspondence, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainsmen, Cleveland, Ohio, 1986-1989.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Liukonen L, Grogan J and Myers W, “Diesel Particulate Exposure to Railroad Train Crews”, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Vol. 63 (5), Sep.-Oct. 2002, pp. 610-616.

    Google Scholar 

  71. "Diesel Engine Exhaust”, Health Hazard Advisory, Hazard Evaluation System & Information Service, California Department of Health Services, Occupational Health Branch, November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  72. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), 2007 ASHRAE Handbook, Chapter 44, “Building Air Intake and Exhaust Design, Atlanta Georgia, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Banka A, Gielow M., Paul J and Gielow R, “A Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Engine Exhaust Flow Patterns from a C39-8 Locomotive, Long Hood Forward”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-86-015, 26 September 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ellsworth K, (Editor), and Houser F and Whitney D (Contributing Editors), The Car and Locomotive Cyclopedia of American Practice, Fourth Edition, Simmons-Boardman Publishing Corporation, Omaha, Nebraska, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Paul J, Linfield K and Banka A, “Determination of Diesel Exhaust Plume Concentrations within Operator Cabs of Selected Locomotives”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-04-DS1-01, 3 December 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Paul J and Linfield K, “Assessment of Diesel Exhaust Plume Exposure Levels within Operator Cabs of Railroad Locomotives”, Livonia, Michigan, Airflow Sciences Corporation Report R-06-RBL-01, 19 October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  77. National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina, Climatic Wind Data for the United States, November 1998, for the time period 1930 through 1996. Refer to Web Site: www.ncdc.noaa.gov.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Fritz S, Southwest Research Institute, “Locomotive Exhaust Emissions: Past Studies, Present Work, and Future Challenges”, Presentation to the Society of Automotive Engineers, TC-9 Committee Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Fritz S, Southwest Research Institute, “Emissions Measurements – Locomotives”, EPA Work Assignments 1-4 and 2-4, Contract No. 68-C2-0144, SwRI Report No. 5374-024, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Bauer H, Editor in Chief, Bosch Automotive Handbook, 4$th$ Edition, 1996, Published by Robert Bosch GmbH, “Exhaust Emissions from Diesel Engines”, pp. 530-531.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Fritz S, Southwest Research Institute, “Diesel Fuel Effects on Locomotive Exhaust Emissions”, 23$rd$ CIMAC Congress, Paper No. 7A-05, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Video Tape (VHS Format) provided by General Electric Transportation Systems, GE WMM Loco Track Test on NS Smoke Ventilation”, 17 August 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Whitaker L, “Diesel Exhaust Fume Study in GE C39-8 Cabs”, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mechanical Department, File 142.3, 22 August 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Beem D, “Diesel Fume Monitoring, Locomotive 3532”, Norfolk Southern Corporation, File IH 13, 13 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paul, J.C., Johnson, R.W., Yates, R.G. (2009). Application of CFD to Rail Car and Locomotive Aerodynamics. In: Browand, F., McCallen, R., Ross, J. (eds) The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles II: Trucks, Buses, and Trains. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85070-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85070-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85069-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85070-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics