Skip to main content

A Categorical Approach to Mereology and Its Application to Modelling Software Components

  • Chapter
Book cover Transactions on Rough Sets VIII

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TRS,volume 5084))

Abstract

Mereocat (mereological category), a theory of part-whole relations based on category theory, is proposed and its basic properties are discussed. The concepts of mereological sum is redefined in categorical framework. The theory is then applied to model some properties of component software architecture.

Partly supported by NSERC of Canada Grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R., Garlan, D.: A Formal Basis for Architectural Connection. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 6(3), 213–249 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr, M., Wells, C.: Toposes, Triples and Theories. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J., Seligman, J.: Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Parts and places: the structures of spatial representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fiadeiro, J.L.: Categories for Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest, P.: Nonclassical mereology and its application to sets. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43(2), 79–94 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goguen, J.A.: Categorical foundations for general systems theory. In: Pichler, F., Trappl, R. (eds.) Advances in Cybernetics and Systems Research, pp. 121–130, Transcripta Books (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goguen, J.A., Rosu, G.: Institution morphisms. Formal Aspects Computing 13(3-5), 274–307 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman, N.: The structure of appearance. Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grzegorczyk, A.: The system of Leśniewski in relation to contemporary logical research. Studia Logica 3, 77–95 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivers, J., Clements, P., Garlan, D., Nord, R., Schmerl, B., Oviedo, J.: Documenting component and connector views with UML 2.0. Technical Report CMU-CS-2004-TR-008, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janicki, R.: On a mereological system for relational software specifications. In: Diks, K., Rytter, W. (eds.) MFCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2420, pp. 375–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Janicki, R.: Basic mereology with equivalence relations. In: Jedrzejowicz, J., Szepietowski, A. (eds.) MFCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3618, pp. 507–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Janicki, R., Khedri, R.: On a formal semantics of tabular expressions. Science of Computer Programming 39(2–3), 189–213 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Janicki, R., Lê, D.T.M.: Towards a pragmatic mereology. Fundamenta Informaticae 75(1-4), 295–314 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jazayeri, M., Ran, A., van der Linden, F.: Software architecture for product families: principles and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lawvere, F.W., Rosebrugh, R.: Sets for Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lê, D.T.M., Janicki, R.: On a parthood specification method for component software. In: Greco, S., Hata, Y., Hirano, S., Inuiguchi, M., Miyamoto, S., Nguyen, H.S., Słowiński, R. (eds.) RSCTC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4259, pp. 537–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard, H.S., Goodman, N.: The calculus of individuals and its uses. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5(2), 45–55 (1940)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Leśniewski, S.: Grundzüge eines neuen systems der grundlagen der mathematik. Fundamenta Mathematicae 24, 1–81 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lopes, A., Wermelinger, M., Fiadeiro, J.L.: High-order architectural connectors. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 12(1), 64–104 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. MacLane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meirav, A.: Wholes, Sums and Unities (Philosophical Studies). Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Kaasbøll, J.J.: Part-whole relationship categories and their application in object-oriented analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(5), 779–797 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Communications of the ACM 15(12), 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parnas, D.L.: On a buzzword: Hierarchical structure. In: Proc. of IFIP 1974 Congress, pp. 336–339. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning. Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15, 316–333 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rumbaugh, J., Eddy, F.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Salustri, F.A., Lockledge, J.C.: Towards a formal theory of products including mereology. In: Proc. of 12th Int’l Conf. on Engineering Design, pp. 1125–1130 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Simons, P.: On understanding Leśniewski. History and Philosophy of Logic 3(2), 165–191 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Simons, P.: Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skowron, A., Stepaniuk, J., Peters, J.F.: Rough Sets and Infomorphisms: Towards Approximation of Relations in Distributed Environments. Fundamenta Informaticae 54(1-3), 263–277 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith, B.: Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data and knowledge engineering 20(3), 287–303 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Srzednicki, J.T.J., Rickey, V.F. (eds.): Leśniewski’s Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

James F. Peters Andrzej Skowron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lê, D.T.M., Janicki, R. (2008). A Categorical Approach to Mereology and Its Application to Modelling Software Components. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets VIII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5084. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85064-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85064-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85063-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85064-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics