Skip to main content

Motivating Students through On-Line Competition: An Analysis of Satisfaction and Learning Styles

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5145))

Abstract

The Bologna model pursues to improve the quality of Higher Education and, in turn, human resources across Europe. One of the action lines of the Bologna Process is the promotion of the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). In this context, motivated students are a key element. Motivation can be reached in a number of different ways, one of which is explored in this paper, and consists in the use of active e-learning methodologies to force students to compete among themselves during their learning process. The relationship between motivation and competition is analysed through a number of hypotheses focusing on elements such as the level of satisfaction of students with different learning styles (competitive, collaborative...) when using the competitive active e-learning tool called QUESTournament. This system has been used in several University courses belonging to different degrees and diplomas taught at the University of Valladolid (Spain). Data collected from these experiences are analysed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Verdú, E., Verdú, M.J., Regueras, L.M., de Castro, J.P.: Intercultural and Multilingual E-Learning to Bridge the Digital Divide. In: Shimojo, S., Ichii, S., Ling, T.-W., Song, K.-H. (eds.) HSI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3597, pp. 260–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prince, M.: Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education 93(3), 223–231 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Higgs, B., McCarthy, M.: Active learning – from lecture theatre to field-work. Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching. All Ireland Society for Higher Education [AISHE], Dublin, 37–44 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C.R., Covington, D., Larsen, J.S.: Active and Interactive Learning Online: A comparison of Web-Based and Conventional Writing Classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43(2), 166–184 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Dietz, E.J.: A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. V. Comparisons with traditionally-taught students. Journal of Engineering Education 87(4), 469–480 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grasha, A.F.: Teaching with style. Alliance, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education 78(7), 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burd, B.A., Buchanan, L.E.: Teaching the teachers: teaching and learning online. Reference Services Review 32(4), 404–412 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carver, C.A., Howard, R.A., Lane, W.D.: Addressing different learning styles through course hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Education 42(1), 33–38 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuljis, J., Liu, F.: A Comparison of Learning Style Theories on the Suitability for elearning. Web Technologies, Applications, and Services, 191–197 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S., Sonnenwald, D.H.: Investigating the relationship between learning style preferences and teaching collaboration skills and technology: An exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Information Science & Technology Annual Conference, pp. 64–73 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, D., Johnson, R.: Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz, D.P., Cartnal, R.B.: Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching 47(4), 130–135 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang, L.J., Yang, J.C., Yu, F.Y., Chan, T.W.: Development and Evaluation of Multiple Competitive Activities in a Synchronous Quiz Game System. Journal of Innovations in Education and Training International 40(1), 16–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Becker, K.: Teaching with games: The minesweeper and asteroids experience. J. Computing Small Colleges 17(2), 23–33 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siddiqui, A., Khan, M., Katar, S.: Supply chain simulator: A scenario-based educational tool to enhance student learning. Computers & Education (2007) doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.00

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence, R.: Teaching Data Structures Using Competitive Games. IEEE Transactions on Education 47(4), 459–466 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Philpot, T.A., Hall, R.H., Hubing, N., Flori, R.E.: Using games to teach statics calculation procedures: Application and assessment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 13(3), 222–232 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fasli, M., Michalakopoulos, M.: Supporting active learning through game-like exercises. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference of Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2005, pp. 730–734 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, F.Y., Chang, L.J., Liu, Y.H., Chan, T.W.: Learning preferences towards computerised competitive modes. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 18(3), 341–350 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buerck, J.P., Malmstrom, T., Peppers, E.: Learning Environments and Learning Styles: Non-traditional Student Enrollment and Success in an Internet-based Versus a Lecture-based Computer Science Course. Learning Environments Research 6(2), 137–155 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gadt-Johnson, C., Price, G.: Comparing students with high and low preference for tactile learning. Education 120, 581–585 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Regueras, L.M., Verdú, E., Pérez, M.A., de Castro, J.P., Verdú, M.J.: Application of TIC-based active methodologies in the framework of the new model of university education: The educational interaction system QUEST. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL) 17(6), 447–460 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bures, E.M., Abrami, P.C., Amundsen, C.: Student motivation to learn via computer conferencing. Research in Higher Education 41(5), 593–621 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., Ives, B.: Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly 25(4), 401–426 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fallows, S., Ahmet, K.: Inspiring Students: Case Studies in Motivating the Learner. Kogan Page, Ltd, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Levy, Y.: Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education 48, 185–204 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuh, G.D.: Assessing what really matters to student learning. Change 33(3), 10–17 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. National Survey of Student Engagement: Engaged Learning: Fostering Success for All Students. Annual Report (2006), http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2006_Annual_Report/docs/NSSE_2006_Annual_Report.pdf

  31. Sahin, I.: Predicting Student Satisfaction in Distance Education and Learning Environments Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 8(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walker, S.L., Fraser, B.J.: Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research 8(2), 289–308 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Frederick Li Jianmin Zhao Timothy K. Shih Rynson Lau Qing Li Dennis McLeod

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Regueras, L.M., Verdú, E., Verdú, M.J., Pérez, M.Á., de Castro, J.P., Muñoz, M.F. (2008). Motivating Students through On-Line Competition: An Analysis of Satisfaction and Learning Styles. In: Li, F., Zhao, J., Shih, T.K., Lau, R., Li, Q., McLeod, D. (eds) Advances in Web Based Learning - ICWL 2008. ICWL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5145. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85032-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85033-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics