The importance of achieving optimal colonic disten-tion prior to CT colonography cannot be overstated, and the editors have justifiably devoted an entire chapter to the subject. Optimal luminal distention enables the reader to rapidly and confidently assess the colon, and undoubtedly improves diagnostic accuracy (Chen et al. 1999; Fletcher et al. 2000; Yee et al. 2003). Conversely, inadequate distention may obliterate the colonic lumen and result in wall/haustral fold thickening (Fig. 7.1), thereby variously hiding or mimicking colorectal neoplasia (Fig. 7.2a, b) (Fletcher et al. 1999; Macari Megibow 2001; Fenlon 2002). Interpretation times are increased when the colon is poorly distended, but of greater importance is the potential to miss significant colonic pathology (Fig. 7.3a–c), occasionally rendering the examination non-diagnostic (i.e. necessitating repeat examination or endoscopic referral) or sometimes frankly misleading. For example, a review of missed significant lesions from a large prospective multicenter trial of CT colonography (Rockey et al. 2005; Paulson et al. 2004) found that suboptimal distention, along with poor preparation, was implicated as a contributing factor in 16 of 28 (57%) false-negative examinations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR 184:786–792
Blakeborough A, Sheridan MB, Chapman AH (1997) Retention balloon catheters and barium enemas: attitudes, current practice and relative safety in the UK. Clin Radiol 52:62–64
Bova JG, Jurdi RA, Bennett WF (1993) Antispasmodic drugs to reduce discomfort and colonic spasm during barium enemas: comparison of oral hyoscyamine, i.v. glucagon and no drug. AJR 161:965–968
Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Brennan DD et al (2003) Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:2264–2270
Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, et al Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239:464–471
Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S et al (2006) Automated insuffla-tion of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR 186:96–103
Chen SC, Lu D, Hecht JR et al (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR 172:595–599
Church J, Delaney C (2003) Randomized controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 46:322–326
Coady-Fariborzian L, Angel LP, Procaccino JA (2004) Perforated colon secondary to virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1247–1249
Fenlon HM (2002) CT colonography: pitfalls and interpretation. Abdom Imaging 27:284–291
Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Maccarty RL et al (1999) CT colonog-raphy: potential pitfalls and problem solving techniques. AJR 172:1271–1278
Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711
Gluecker T, Johnson D, Harmsen W et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 227:378–384
Goei R, Nix M, Kessels AH et al (1995) Use of antispasmodic drugs in double contrast barium enema examination: glu-cagon or buscopan? Clin Radiol 50:553–557
Grant DS, Bartram CI, Heron CW (1986) A preliminary study of the possible benefits of using carbon dioxide insuffla-tion during double contrast barium enema. Br J Radiol 59(698):190–191
Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777
Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al (2001) CT colonogra-phy: single versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465
Iafrate F, Laghi A, Paolantonio P et al (2004) Colonic distension using mechanical CO2 insufflator versus manual air distension. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program, Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America, p 432
Kamar M, Portnoy O, Bar-Dayan A et al (2004) Actual colonic perforation in virtual colonoscopy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1242–1244
Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neopla-sia. N Engl J Med 357:1403–12
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using 3D CT colonog-raphy with 2D imaging correlation. AJR 176:137–143
Macari M (2004) Techniques for CT colonography. In: Fifth international symposium virtual colonoscopy course handbook, Boston, pp 45–48
Morrin M, Farrell R, Keogan M et al (2002) CT colonography: colonic distension improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagons. Eur Radiol 12:525–530
Paulson EK, Foster WL, Thonpson WM et al (2004) Causes of errors in CT colonography (CTC) and air contrast barium enema (ACBE) in detection of colonic lesions 1 cm or larger (abstract). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program, Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America, p 618
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomo-graphic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neo-plasia in asymptomatic adults. NEJM 349:2191–200
Pickhardt PJ (2004) Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radio-graphics 24:1535–1556
Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonog-raphy: review of existing data and implication for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239:313–316
Ristvedt S, McFarland E, Weinstock L et al (2003) Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98:578–585
Rockey DC, Paulson EK, Niedzwiecki D et al (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonog-raphy, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365:305–311
Rogalla P, Bauknecht HC, Hein PA et al (2004). Pressure-controlled colonic insufflation for CT colonography. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program (abstract), Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America, p 432
Rubesin S, Levine MS, Laufer I et al (2000) Double-contrast barium enema examination technique. Radiology 215:642–650
Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006; 239:457–463
Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A et al (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222:337–345
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V et al (2003a) Optimizing colonic distension for multi -detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine hydrobromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 229:99–108
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP et al (2003b) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR 181:913–921
Tran DQ, Rosen L, Kim R, Riether RD, Stasik JJ, Khubchandani IT. Actual colonoscopy: what are the risks of prerforation? Am Surg. 2001; 67(9):845–7; discussion 847–8
Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA et al (1999) The usefulness of glu-cagon hydrochloride for colonic distension in CT colonog-raphy. AJR 173:169–172
Yee J, Galdino G, Kumar N et al (2002) Comparison of colonic distention using electronic CO2 insufflation and manual atmospheric insufflation on CT colonography (abstract). In: RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting program, Oak Brook
Yee J, Kumar N, Hung R et al (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burling, D., Taylor, S., Halligan, S. (2010). How to Get the Colon Distended?. In: Lefere, P., Gryspeerdt, S. (eds) Virtual Colonoscopy. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79886-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79886-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79879-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79886-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)