Skip to main content

Clinical Indications

  • Chapter
Coronary CT Angiography
  • 1325 Accesses

The clinically most relevant indications for coronary CT angiography are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended Reading

  1. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1919–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2204–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordeiro MA, Lima JA. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:C40–C47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Roos A, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, Geleijns J. Applications of multislice computed tomography in coronary artery disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26:14–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT Coronary angiography: Examination technique, clinical results, and outlook on future developments. Fort-schr Röntgenstr 2007; 179:246–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewey M, Müller M, Eddicks S, et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional tran-sthoracic echocardiography: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:2034–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:407–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in tisease. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1350–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:951–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Friedrich GJ, et al. Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1410–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Schachner T, et al. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186:1676–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multide-tector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296:403–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1573–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gasparovic H, Rybicki FJ, Millstine J, et al. Three dimensional computed tomographic imaging in planning the surgical approach for redo cardiac surgery after coronary revascularization. Eur J Cardi-othorac Surg 2005; 28:244–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2006; 92:58–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1896–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell J W. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: A meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:217–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/ SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1475–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005; 293:2471–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, Cury RC, et al. Cardiac CT in emergency department patients with acute chest pain. Radiographics 2006; 26:963–78; discussion 79–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones CM, Athanasiou T, Dunne N, et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment: A meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:341–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:2354–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruch G, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE. Cardiac CT: Coronary arteries and beyond. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:994–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: Evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2006; 28:1879–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004; 110:3234–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1658–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:1469–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer TS, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:946–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:2265–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Poon M, Rubin GD, Achenbach S, et al. Consensus update on the appropriate usage of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19:484–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2567–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:2393–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoepf UJ, Zwerner PL, Savino G, Herzog C, Kerl JM, Costello P. Coronary CT angiography. Radiology 2007; 244:48–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Ackerman M, et al. Use of multidetec-tor computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: A consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2196–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Vleuten PA, Willems T P, Gotte MJ, et al. Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. A meta-analysis and review of the current literature. Acta Radiol 2006; 47:1049–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Va n Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: A comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006; 114:645–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, et al. Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:786–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Dewey .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dewey, M. (2009). Clinical Indications. In: Coronary CT Angiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79844-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79844-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79844-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics