In the literature of intergenerational equity, Rawlsian maximin principle is one of the most well-known criteria for distributive justice among generations.1 Since this principle has an intuitive appeal to egalitarian writers, several attempts to characterize the principle have been made in welfare economics. Arrow (1973), Dasgupta (1974a, b), and Riley (1976) scrutinized the performance thereof in the context of optimal growth. Arrow shows that the utility path as well as the consumption path generated by the maximin principle has a saw-tooth shape. Dasgupta shows that it gives rise to a logical deficit such as time-inconsistency. The other line of researches has been stimulated by the axiomatic approaches of Hammond (1976, 1979) and Sen (1970, 1977). In this line, researchers extended axiomatizations of the maximin principle and applied them to intergenerational equity. The maximin path is characterized by a constant path, which emphasizes its egalitarian perspective.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1973). Rawls’s principle of just saving. Swedish Journal of Economics, 75, 323–335
Asheim, G. B., Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., & Suzumura, K. (2006). Infinite-horizon choice functions (mimeo). Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University
Asheim, G. B., Buchholz, W., & Tungodden, B. (2001). Justifying sustainability. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 252–268
Dasgupta, P. (1974a). On some alternative criteria for justice between generations. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 405–423
Dasgupta, P. (1974b). On some problems arising from professor Rawls’ conception of distributive justice. Theory and Decision, 4, 325–344
Epstein, L. G. (1986a). Intergenerational consumption rules: An axiomatization of utilitarianism and egalitarianism. Journal Economic Theory, 38, 280–297
Epstein, L. G. (1986b). Intergenerational preference orderings. Social Choice and Welfare, 3, 151–160
Hammond, P. J. (1976). Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica, 44, 793–804
Hammond, P. J. (1979). Equity in two person situations: Some consequences. Econometrica, 47, 1127–1135
Lauwers, L. (1997). Rawlsian equity and generalized utilitarianism with an infinite population. Economic Theory, 9, 143–150
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Riley, J. G. (1976). Further remarks on the Rawlsian principle of just saving. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78, 16–25
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd
Sen, A. K. (1977). On weights and measures: Informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica, 45, 1539–1572
Suga, K., & Udagawa, D. (2004). Axiomatic characterization of the maximin principle in the Arrow-Dasgupta economy (mimeo)
Suzumura, K. (1983). Rational choice, collective decisions and social welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suga, K., Udagawa, D. (2008). Characterization of the Maximin Choice Function in a Simple Dynamic Economy. In: Pattanaik, P.K., Tadenuma, K., Xu, Y., Yoshihara, N. (eds) Rational Choice and Social Welfare. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79831-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79832-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)