Skip to main content

Characterization of the Maximin Choice Function in a Simple Dynamic Economy

  • Chapter
  • 1018 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Choice and Welfare ((WELFARE))

In the literature of intergenerational equity, Rawlsian maximin principle is one of the most well-known criteria for distributive justice among generations.1 Since this principle has an intuitive appeal to egalitarian writers, several attempts to characterize the principle have been made in welfare economics. Arrow (1973), Dasgupta (1974a, b), and Riley (1976) scrutinized the performance thereof in the context of optimal growth. Arrow shows that the utility path as well as the consumption path generated by the maximin principle has a saw-tooth shape. Dasgupta shows that it gives rise to a logical deficit such as time-inconsistency. The other line of researches has been stimulated by the axiomatic approaches of Hammond (1976, 1979) and Sen (1970, 1977). In this line, researchers extended axiomatizations of the maximin principle and applied them to intergenerational equity. The maximin path is characterized by a constant path, which emphasizes its egalitarian perspective.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1973). Rawls’s principle of just saving. Swedish Journal of Economics, 75, 323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G. B., Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y., & Suzumura, K. (2006). Infinite-horizon choice functions (mimeo). Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G. B., Buchholz, W., & Tungodden, B. (2001). Justifying sustainability. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 252–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1974a). On some alternative criteria for justice between generations. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1974b). On some problems arising from professor Rawls’ conception of distributive justice. Theory and Decision, 4, 325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. (1986a). Intergenerational consumption rules: An axiomatization of utilitarianism and egalitarianism. Journal Economic Theory, 38, 280–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. (1986b). Intergenerational preference orderings. Social Choice and Welfare, 3, 151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1976). Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’ difference principle. Econometrica, 44, 793–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. J. (1979). Equity in two person situations: Some consequences. Econometrica, 47, 1127–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. (1997). Rawlsian equity and generalized utilitarianism with an infinite population. Economic Theory, 9, 143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. G. (1976). Further remarks on the Rawlsian principle of just saving. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78, 16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1977). On weights and measures: Informational constraints in social welfare analysis. Econometrica, 45, 1539–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suga, K., & Udagawa, D. (2004). Axiomatic characterization of the maximin principle in the Arrow-Dasgupta economy (mimeo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1983). Rational choice, collective decisions and social welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suga, K., Udagawa, D. (2008). Characterization of the Maximin Choice Function in a Simple Dynamic Economy. In: Pattanaik, P.K., Tadenuma, K., Xu, Y., Yoshihara, N. (eds) Rational Choice and Social Welfare. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics