Skip to main content

Ordinal Distance, Dominance, and the Measurement of Diversity

  • Chapter
Rational Choice and Social Welfare

Part of the book series: Studies in Choice and Welfare ((WELFARE))

The purpose of this chapter is to consider a class of rules for comparing sets of objects1 in terms of the degrees of diversity that they offer. Such comparisons of sets are important for many purposes. For example, in discussing biodiversity of different ecosystems, one is interested in knowing whether or not one ecosystem is more diverse than another. Similarly, when discussing issues relating to cultural diversities of various communities, one may be interested in knowing how these communities compare with each other in terms of cultural diversity. In the economics literature, there have been several contributions to the measurement of diversity. Weitzman (1992, 1993, 1998) develops a measure of diversity based on cardinal distances between objects. Among other things, Nehring and Puppe (2002) provide a conceptual foundation for cardinal distances in Weitzman’s framework. Weikard (2002) discusses an alternative measure of diversity; Weikard’s measure is based on the sum of cardinal distances between all objects contained in a set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bervoets, S., and Gravel, N. (2007). Appraising diversity with an ordinal notion of similarity: An axiomatic approach. Mathematical Social Sciences, 53, 259–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P. K., and Xu, Y. (2003). Similarity of objects and the measurement of diversity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 405–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, K., and Puppe, C. (2002). A theory of diversity. Econometrica, 70, 1155–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P. K., and Xu, Y. (2000). On diversity and freedom of choice. Mathematical Social Sciences, 40, 123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weikard, H. (2002). Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity. Land Economics, 78, 20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (1992). On diversity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 363–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (1993). What to preserve? An application of diversity theory to crane conservation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 157–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (1998). The Noah’s ark problem. Econometrica, 66, 1279–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pattanaik, P.K., Xu, Y. (2008). Ordinal Distance, Dominance, and the Measurement of Diversity. In: Pattanaik, P.K., Tadenuma, K., Xu, Y., Yoshihara, N. (eds) Rational Choice and Social Welfare. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics