Abstract
The recent advent of newer multidetector computer tomography (MDCT) scanners has dramatically changed the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of the abdominal aorta and its peripheral branches, due to its faster acquisition times, higher spatial resolution allowing to obtain submillimetric sections with voxel isotropy, greater technical simplicity, wider availability, and lower overall cost. However, lack of ionizing radiation and of intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material remain substantial advantages of MRI over MDCT, that make it the technique of choice for young patients and individuals with high serum creatinine values. Moreover, for the assessment of renal arteries MRI offers not only adequate anatomical detail but, and more importantly, is also able to provide quantitative data relative to renal blood flow, as well as to yield functional information about the parenchymal effect of a vascular stenosis by means of phase contrast and perfusion techniques, respectively. In this particular concern, MRI may be successfully proposed as a novel noninvasive tool for functional evaluation of the kidneys.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Böckler D, Hylik-Dürr A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. (2007) Clinical requirements of aortic imaging. Radiologe 47(11):962–973
Cornelissen SA, Verhagen HJ, Prokop M, et al. (2008) Visualizing type IV endoleak using magnetic resonance imaging with a blood pool contrast agent). J Vasc Surg 47(4):861–864
Gottlieb R, Chen A (2002) Pictorial essay MR findings of Erdheim-Chester disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(2):257–261
Ho VB, Corse WR (2003) MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and peripheral vessels. Radiol Clin N Am 41(1):115–144
Kaufman SL, White RI Jr, Harrington DP, et al. (1978) Protean manifestations of mycotic aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131(6):1019–1025
Lee WK, Mossop PJ, Little AF, et al. (2008) Infected (mycotic) aneurysms: spectrum of imaging appearances and management. Radiographics 28(7):1853–1868
Macedo TA, Stanson AW, Oderich GS, et al. (2004) Infected aortic aneurysms: imaging findings. Radiology 231(1):250– 257. Erratum in: Radiology 2006;238(3):1078
McGuigan EA, Sears ST, Corse WR, et al. (2005) MR angiogra-phy of the abdominal aorta. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13(1):65–89
Michaely HJ, Attenberger UI, Kramer H, et al. (2007) Abdominal and pelvic MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15(3):301–314
Miyazaki M, Lee VS (2008) Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology 248(1):20–43
Murray D, Marshall M, England E, et al. (2001) Erdheim-Chester disease. Clin Radiol 56:481–484
Nitecki SS, Hallet JW Jr, Stanson AW, et al. (1996) Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurisms: a casa control study. J Vasc Surg 23:860–868
Shih MC, Hagspiel KD (2007) CTA and MRA in mesenteric ischemia: part 1, Role in diagnosis and differential diagnosis. AJR 188(2):452–461
Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR (2007) Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 243(3):641–655
Surabhi VR, Menis C, Prasad SR, et al. (2008) Neoplastic and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders of the perirenal space: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics 28(4):1005–1017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zampa, V., Turini, F., Faggioni, L., Caproni, G. (2010). Abdominal Aorta and Renal Arteries. In: Neri, E., Cosottini, M., Caramella, D. (eds) MR Angiography of the Body. Diagnostic Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79717-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79717-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79716-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79717-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)