Skip to main content

An Analysis of Interest-Community Facilitated Peer-to-Peer Search

  • Conference paper
Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing (AP2PC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4461))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

We study the effect of semantic overlay structure on the performance of decentralized search. Semantic overlays create communities of nodes that share particular interests. In peer-to-peer systems these communities can be designed to improve the recall of search algorithms. Such communities also play a role in balancing load between agents. An examination of these two performance metrics on some basic semantic overlay topologies shows that the choice of the best decentralized search algorithm can be influenced by differing design goals. We present an extensive experimental evaluation using data sets from eDonkey and Movielens. We find that, in general, these data sets do not exhibit obvious semantic clusters of nodes. For this reason, using a best-neighbors overlay, in which nodes individually choose their neighbors, to implement search produces better recall values than using an overlay that specifically clusters nodes into groups. Using best-neighbors overlays, on the other hand, can lead to highly unbalanced load distributions, a problem avoided in clustered overlays. We also find that forwarding search queries to “friends” in best-neighbors overlays does little to improve recall while further unbalancing load distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fessant, F.L., Handurukande, S., Kermerrec, A.M., Massoulie, L.: Clustering in peer-to-peer file sharing workloads. In: Voelker, G.M., Shenker, S. (eds.) IPTPS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3279, pp. 217–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, B., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Pocketlens: Toward a personal recommender system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22, 437–476 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, E., Shenker, S.: Replication strategies in unstructured peer-to-peer networks. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 32, 177–190 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chawathe, Y., Ratnasamy, S., Breslau, L., Lanham, N., Shenker, S.: Making gnutella-like p2p systems scalable. In: Proc. 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp. 407–418 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cholvi, V., Felber, P., Biersack, E.: Efficient search in unstructured peer-to-peer networks. In: Proc. 16th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 271–272 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sripanidkulchai, K., Maggs, B., Zhang, H.: Efficient content location using interest-based locality in peer-to-peer systems. In: Proc. of the 22nd INFOCOM Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voulgaris, S., van Steen, M.: Epidemic-style management of semantic overlays for content-based searching. In: Cunha, J.C., Medeiros, P.D. (eds.) Euro-Par 2005. LNCS, vol. 3648, pp. 1143–1152. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, B., Vinograd, P., Garcia-Molina, H.: Evaluating guess and non-forwarding peer-to-peer search. In: Proc. 24th Int’l Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 209–218 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, E., Fiat, A., Kaplan, H.: Associative search in peer-to-peer networks: Harnessing latent semantics. In: Proc. of the 22nd INFOCOM Conference (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crespo, A., Garcia-Molina, H.: Semantic overlay networks for p2p systems. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Stanford University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garbacki, P., Epema, D., van Steen, M.: A Two-Level Semantic Caching Scheme for Super-Peer Networks. In: Proc. IEEE 10th Int’l Workshop on Web Content Caching and Distribution (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nejdl, W., Wolpers, M., Siberski, W., Schmitz, C., Schlosser, M., Brunkhorst, I., Löser, A.: Super-peer-based routing and clustering strategies for rdf-based peer-to-peer networks. In: Proc. 12th Int’l World Wide Web Conference, pp. 536–543 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ogston, E., van Steen, M., Brazier, F.: Group formation among decentralized autonomous agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18, 953–970 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sam Joseph Zoran Despotovic Gianluca Moro Sonia Bergamaschi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ogston, E. (2008). An Analysis of Interest-Community Facilitated Peer-to-Peer Search. In: Joseph, S., Despotovic, Z., Moro, G., Bergamaschi, S. (eds) Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing. AP2PC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4461. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79705-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79705-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79704-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79705-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics