Skip to main content

Assessing Quality Processes with ODC COQUALMO

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5007))

Abstract

Software quality processes can be assessed with the Orthogonal Defect Classification COnstructive QUALity MOdel (ODC COQUALMO) that predicts defects introduced and removed, classified by ODC types. Using parametric cost and defect removal inputs, static and dynamic versions of the model help one determine the impacts of quality strategies on defect profiles, cost and risk. The dynamic version provides insight into time trends and is suitable for continuous usage on a project. The models are calibrated with empirical data on defect distributions, introduction and removal rates; and supplemented with Delphi results for detailed ODC defect detection efficiencies. This work has supported the development of software risk advisory tools for NASA flight projects. We have demonstrated the integration of ODC COQUALMO with automated risk minimization methods to design higher value quality processes, in shorter time and with fewer resources, to meet stringent quality goals on projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chulani, S., Boehm, B.: Modeling software defect introduction and removal: COQUALMO (COnstructive QUALity MOdel), University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering, USC-CSE Technical Report 99-510 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm, B., Abts, C., Brown, A., Chulani, S., Clark, B., Horowitz, E., Madachy, R., Reifer, D., Steece, B.: Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., Grünbacher, P. (eds.): Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boehm, B.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I., Chaar, J., Halliday, M., Moebus, D., Ray, B., Wong, M.: Orthogonal Defect Classification - A Concept for In-Process Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(11), 943–956 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lutz, R., Mikulski, I.: Final Report: Adapting ODC for Empirical Analysis of Pre-Launch Anomalies, version 1.2, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratories, JPL Caltech report (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Madachy, R.: Risk Model Calibration Report, USC Center for Systems and Software Engineering, Report to NASA AMES (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madachy, R.: JPL Delphi Survey for V&V Defect Detection Efficiencies, USC Center for Systems and Software Engineering, Report to NASA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Madachy, R.: Calibration of ODC COQUALMO to Predict V&V Effectiveness, USC Center for Systems and Software Engineering, Report to NASA AMES (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madachy, R.: Software Process Dynamics. IEEE-Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menzies, T., Richardson, J.: XOMO: Understanding Development Options for Autonomy. In: 20th International Forum on COCOMO and Software cost Modeling, USC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Port, D., Kazman, R., Polo, B., Nakao, H., Katahira, M.: Practicing What is Preached: 80-20 Rules for Strategic IV&V Assessment, Center for Strategic Software Engineering, Technical Report, CSSE-TR20051025, University of Hawaii at Manoa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feather, M., Cornford, S.: Quantitative Risk-based Requirements Reasoning. Requirements Engineering 8(4), 242–265 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feather, M., Cornford, S., Hicks, K., Johnson, R.: Applications of Tool Support for Risk-informed Requirements Reasoning. Computer Systems Science and Engineering 20(1), 5–17 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Madachy, R., Boehm, B., Richardson, J., Feather, M., Menzies, T.: Value-Based Design of Software V&V Processes for NASA Flight Projects. In: AIAA Space 2007 Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Qing Wang Dietmar Pfahl David M. Raffo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madachy, R., Boehm, B. (2008). Assessing Quality Processes with ODC COQUALMO. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds) Making Globally Distributed Software Development a Success Story. ICSP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79588-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79587-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79588-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics