Cooperative Techniques Supporting Sensor-Based People-Centric Inferencing
People-centric sensor-based applications targeting mobile device users offer enormous potential. However, learning inference models in this setting is hampered by the lack of labeled training data and appropriate feature inputs. Data features that lead to better classification models are not available at all devices due to device heterogeneity. Even for devices that provide superior data features, models require sufficient training data, perhaps manually labeled by users, before they work well. We propose opportunistic feature vector merging, and the social-network-driven sharing of training data and models between users. Model and training data sharing within social circles combine to reduce the user effort and time involved in collecting training data to attain the maximum classification accuracy possible for a given model, while feature vector merging can enable a higher maximum classification accuracy by enabling better performing models even for more resource-constrained devices. We evaluate our proposed techniques with a significant places classifier that infers and tags locations of importance to a user based on data gathered from cell phones.
KeywordsTraining Data Feature Vector Cell Phone Social Connection Cooperative Technique
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Acuna, E., Rodriguez, C.: The treatment of missing values and its effect in the classifier accuracy. In: Classification, Clustering and Data Mining Applications, pp. 639–648 (2004)Google Scholar
- 4.Choudhury, T., Pentland, A.: Sensing and modeling human networks using the sociometer. In: ISWC 2003: Proc. of the 7th IEEE Int’l Symp. on Wearable Computersp, Washington, DC, USA, p. 216 (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Cox, L.P., Dalton, A., Marupadi, V.: Smokescreen: flexible privacy controls for presence-sharing. In: MobiSys 2007: Proc. of the 5th int’l conf. on Mobile systems, applications and services, pp. 233–245. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 8.Gruteser, M., Grunwald, D.: Enhancing location privacy in wireless lan through disposable interface identifiers: a quantitative analysis. In: WMASH 2003: Proc. of the 1st ACM Int’l workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots, New York, NY, USA, pp. 46–55 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Hofmann, T., Basilico, J.: Collaborative machine learning. In: From Integrated Publication and Information Systems to Virtual Information and Knowledge Environments, pp. 173–182 (2005)Google Scholar
- 13.Liao, L., Fox, D., Kautz, H.: Location-based activity recognition. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18, pp. 787–794. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
- 18.Patterson, D.J., Liao, L., Gajos, K., Collier, M., Livic, N., Olson, K., Wang, S., Fox, D., Kautz, H.A.: Opportunity knocks: A system to provide cognitive assistance with transportation services. In: Davies, N., Mynatt, E.D., Siio, I. (eds.) UbiComp 2004. LNCS, vol. 3205, pp. 433–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Shardanand, U., Maes, P.: Social information filtering: algorithms for automating word of mouth. In: CHI 1995: Proc. of the SIGCHI conf. on Human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 210–217 (1995)Google Scholar
- 20.Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
- 22.Zhu, X.: Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey. Tech. Report UW-Madison 1530 (2005)Google Scholar