Advertisement

Preamble MAC Protocols with Non-persistent Receivers in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Abdelmalik Bachir
  • Martin Heusse
  • Andrzej Duda
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4982)

Abstract

In preamble sampling MAC protocols, nodes keep their radios off most of the time to reduce idle listening and periodically wake up for a short time to check whether there is an ongoing transmission on the channel. Such access methods result in substantial energy savings in low traffic conditions. In this paper, we compare several representative preamble sampling MAC protocols in which receivers are non-persistent. Our analysis takes into account bit error rate and traffic load to compute energy consumption and link reliability. Our results show that two access methods obtain the longest normalized lifetime for a wide range of bit error rates: MFP (Micro Frame Preamble) and DFP (Data Frame Preamble).

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Network Data Frame Channel Sampling Single Transmission Idle Listening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bachir, A., Barthel, D., Heusse, M., Duda, A.: Micro-Frame Preamble MAC for Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Istanbul, Turkey (June 2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bachir, A., Heusse, M., Duda, A.: Preamble MAC Protocols with Persistent Receivers in Wireless Sensor Networks (Submitted, 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    El-Hoiydi, A.: Aloha with Preamble Sampling for Sporadic Traffic in Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, New York (April 2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Enz, C., El-Hoiydi, A., Decotignie, J., Peiris, V.: WiseNET: An Ultralow-Power Wireless Sensor Network Solution. IEEE Computer 37(8), 62–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chipcon Corporation. CC2500 Single Chip Low Cost Low Power RF Transceiver, Data Sheet (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schurgers, C., et al.: Optimizing Sensor Networks in the Energy-Latency-Density Design Space. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 1(1), 70–80 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hill, J., Culler, D.: Mica: a wireless plateform for deeply embedded systems. IEEE Micro. 22(6) (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polastre, J., Hill, J., Culler, D.: Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SenSys (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buettner, M., et al.: X-MAC: A Short Preamble MAC Protocol For Duty-CycledWireless Networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Boulder, CO (November 2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahlknecht, S., Boeck, M.: CSMA-MPS: A Minimum Preamble Sampling MAC Protocol for Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, Vienna, Austria (September 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ye, W., Silva, F., Heidemann, J.: Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling. In: Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Boulder, CO (November 2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdelmalik Bachir
    • 1
  • Martin Heusse
    • 1
  • Andrzej Duda
    • 1
  1. 1.Grenoble Informatics LaboratoryGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations