Skip to main content

Modeling and Using Polish Legal Knowledge - Commercial Companies Code Ontology

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems (BIS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 7))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1423 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is motivated by three goals: more advanced knowledge modeling techniques on the basis of the statute-specific legal ontology in the domain of commercial law are presented; secondly, a number of real-life problems solutions using a kind of reasoning system show how the reasoning may be held over the ontology; finally, we point out some difficulties which may be encountered at the building process of similar knowledge models. The ontology describes fundamental concepts taken from the Polish Commercial Companies Code which has been amended in order to comply Polish law with EU standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knublauch, H., Musen, M.A., Rector, A.L.: Editing Description Logic Ontologies with the Protégé OWL Plugin. In: International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2004), Whistler, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Despres, S., Szulman, S.: Construction of a Legal Ontology from a European Community Legislative Text, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. In: Jurix 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, Amsterdam, pp. 79–88 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., et al.: The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Champin, P., Houben, G., Thiran, P.: Cross: an OWL wrapper for reasoning with relational databases. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), pp. 333–337 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michałowska, K.: Polish commercial companies code: bilingual edition Polish-English / Eng. transl. by Katarzyna Michałowska, 3rd edn., Warszawa, C.H. Beck (January 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., López-Cima, A.: Building Legal Ontologies with METHONTOLOGY and WebODE. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 142–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez, M., Gomez-Perez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: from Ontological Art towards Ontological Engineering. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium Series on Ontological Engineering, pp. 33–40 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: The DIG Description Logic Interface. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2003), Rome, Italy, September 5-7 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon, T.F.: Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules: interpreting legal rules as reasoning policies. In: ICAIL 2007: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 117–121. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gangemi, A.: Design patterns for legal ontology construction. In: Proceedings of LOAIT 2007 II Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abramowicz, W., Stolarski, P., Tomaszewski, T.: Reasoning in the Domain of Commercial Law Using Commercial Companies Code Ontology. In: Proceedings of JURIX 2007. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Series, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamins, R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Witold Abramowicz Dieter Fensel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stolarski, P., Tomaszewski, T. (2008). Modeling and Using Polish Legal Knowledge - Commercial Companies Code Ontology. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79395-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79396-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics