Skip to main content

Agreeing While Disagreeing, a Best Practice for Business Ontology Development

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 7))

Abstract

The agreement is a crucial part of our living together. Important opportunities for sharing resources, integrating systems and collaborating depend on our ability to agree. While we are interested in methods and technologies that support shared agreement, we somehow tend to forget the disagreement; indeed, it is also a part of reality.

In the Semantic Web field, most of research activities investigate ontology agreement and its formalization, rather than the disagreement and the best practices about its extended use.

We claim that the industrial uptake of the Semantic Web is severely limited by the fact that, in the real world, shared agreements are difficult to reach and maintain and that “agreeing while disagreeing” is a common practice. In this paper we illustrate a best practice, which we learned from practical experience, that makes use of an (almost) unexplored potentiality of the Semantic Web to express disagreement, and we describe its use in the e-employment sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J.: Agreeing to Disagree. The Annals of Statistics 4(6), 1236–1239 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25(1-2), 161–197 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T.: The Fractal Nature of the Web, working draft (1998–2007), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Fractal.html

  4. Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W.: The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Bruijn, J., Ehrig, M., Feier, C., Martíns-Recuerda, F., Scharffe, F., Weiten, M.: Ontology Mediation, Merging, and Aligning. In: Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, pp. 95–113. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newell, A.: The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence 18(1), 87–127 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems. FOIS 1998, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mallya, A.U., Huhns, M.N.: Commitments among agents. Internet Computing 7(4), 90–93 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagypál, G.: Ontology development. In: Studer, R., Grimm, S., Abecker, A. (eds.) Semantic Web Services, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Horrocks, I., Motik, B.: OWL 1.1 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. Technical report, W3C (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boley, H., Kifer, M.: RIF Core Design. Technical report, W3C (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Bruijn, J., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Fensel, D.: The web service modeling language: An overview. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kerrigan, M.: D9.1v0.1 Web Service Modeling Toolkit. Technical report, University of Innsbruck (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 2004/387/EC: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Interoperable Delivery of pan-European Services to Public Administrations, 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mocan, A., Cimpian, E.: Mappings creation using a view based approach. In: MEDIATE 2005. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, vol. 168, pp. 97–112 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Witold Abramowicz Dieter Fensel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Della Valle, E., Celino, I., Cerizza, D. (2008). Agreeing While Disagreeing, a Best Practice for Business Ontology Development. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79395-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79396-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics