Skip to main content

Weak Dependencies in Business Process Models

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems (BIS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 7))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business process management systems (BPMS) have proven to be effective in high-volume, repetitive production processes. However, the rigid structure of process models used in BPMS hinders their use in less repetitive processes performed by information workers, where a high degree of flexibility is required. In this paper, an extension to the traditional process models is presented, where ad hoc, runtime changes to process instances are enabled. The extension, weak dependencies, is motivated by business cases presented in the paper. Additionally, formal description of weak dependencies as well as a proof-of-concept prototype are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Implementing Dynamic Flexibility in Workflows using Worklets. BPM Center Report, Queensland University of Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casati, F., Grefen, P., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G., Sánchez, G.: A Specification Language for the WIDE Workflow Model. Technical report, University of Twente (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis, C.A., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, COOCS 1995, pp. 10–21 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jablonski, S.: MOBILE: A Modular Workflow Model and Architecture. In: Proceedings of Int’l Working Conference on Dynamic Modelling and Information Systems, Nordwijkerhout (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow management - Modelling concepts, architecture and implementation. International Thomson Computer Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Object Management Group (OMG): Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification 1.0 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. OASIS: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL4WS) Version 1.1. Specification Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, R., Greiner, U., Rahm, E.: AGENT WORK: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data Knowl. Eng., Elsevier Science Publishers (51), 223–256 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPTflex—Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(2), 93–129 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - a Survey. Data Knowl. Eng. 50(1), 9–34 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadiq, S., Marjanovic, O., Orlowska, M.E.: Managing Change and Time in Dynamic Workflow Processes. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 9(1-2), 93–116 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M.E., Sadiq, W.: Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows. Information Systems 30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber, B., Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features in Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 574–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Witold Abramowicz Dieter Fensel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kowalkiewicz, M., Lu, R., Bäuerle, S., Krümpelmann, M., Lippe, S. (2008). Weak Dependencies in Business Process Models. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79395-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79396-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics