The Role of Propagule Pressure in Invasion Success

  • Emma L. Johnston
  • Richard F. Piola
  • Graeme F. Clark
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 204)

One of the core goals of invasion biology is the identification of factors that increase the risk of establishment success of non-native species. Historically, marine invasions have been investigated through observational studies and surveys (Cohen and Carlton 1998; Ruiz et al. 2000). These have guided ecologists towards the processes most relevant to invasion, but researchers are becoming increasingly aware of the limitations of observational studies alone. It is clear that different factors may influence invasion success at different stages of the invasion process (Kolar and Lodge 2001) and a major challenge is to quantify the relative importance of these factors. Understanding the intricacies of invasion dynamics requires a rigorous approach, in which potentially important factors can be controlled, manipulated and tested (Ruiz et al. 2000). Particularly strong calls have been made for the inclusion of propagule pressure or invader supply into our models, experiments and surveys, and this chapter reviews recent progress in elucidating the role of propagule pressure on invasion success in marine ecosystems.


Invasion Success Round Goby Propagule Pressure Biotic Resistance Invasion Biology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agius BP (2007) Spatial and temporal effects of pre-seeding plates with invasive ascidians: growth, recruitment and community composition. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes DKA, Warren NL, Webb K, Phalan B, Reid K (2004) Polar pedunculate barnacles piggyback on pycnogona, penguins, pinniped seals and plastics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 284:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bravo MA, Cameron B, Metaxas A (2007) Salinity tolerance in the early larval stages of Carcinus maenas (Decapoda, Brachyura), a recent invader of the Bras d'Or Lakes, Nova Scotia, Canada. Crustaceana 80:475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulleri F, Abbiati M, Airoldi L (2006) The colonisation of human-made structures by the invasive alga Codium fragile ssp tomentosoides in the north Adriatic Sea (NE Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 555:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calabrese A, Collier R, Nelson D, MacInnes J (1973) The toxicity of heavy metals to embryos of the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Mar Biol 18:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caley M, Carr M, Hixon M, Hughes T, Jones G, Menge B (1996) Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:277–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlton JT (1996) Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77:1653–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JT, Hodder J (1995) Biogeography and dispersal of coastal marine organisms — experimental studies on a replica of a 16th-century sailing vessel. Mar Biol 121:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carriglio D, Fanelli G, Rubino F (2004) First record of the alien gastropod Melibe fimbriata (Opistobranchia: Tethyidae) in the Taranto seas (Mediterranean Sea). J Mar Biol Assoc U K 84:1067–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castilla JC, Guinez R, Caro AU, Ortiz V (2004) Invasion of a rocky intertidal shore by the tunicate Pyura praeputialis in the Bay of Antofagasta, Chile. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8517–8524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Charmantier G, Gimenez L, Charmantier-Daures M, Anger K (2002) Ontogeny of osmoremila-tion, physiological plasticity and larval export strategy in the grapsid crab Chasmagnathus granulata (Crustacea, Decapoda). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu KH, Tam PF, Fung CH, Chen QC (1997) A biological survey of ballast water in container ships entering Hong Kong. Hydrobiologia 352:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark GF, Johnston EL (2005) Manipulating larval supply in the field: a controlled study of marine invasibility. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 298: 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen AN, Harris LH, Bingham BL, Carlton JT, Chapman JW, Lambert CC, Lambert G, Ljubenkov JC, Murray SN, Rao LC, Reardon K, Schwindt E (2005) Rapid assessment survey for exotic organisms in southern California bays and harbors, and abundance in port and non-port areas. Biol Invas 7:995–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connor P (1972) Acute toxicity of heavy metals to some marine larvae. Mar Pollut Bull 3:190–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corkum LD, Sapota MR, Skora KE (2004) The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biol Invas 6:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coutts ADM, Dodgshun T (2007) A preliminary assessment of the nature and extent of fouling in ships' sea-chests in New Zealand. Mar Pollut Bull 54:875–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coutts ADM, Taylor MD (2004) A preliminary investigation of biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on merchant vessels in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 38:215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coutts ADM, Taylor MD, Hewitt CL (2006) Novel method for assessing the en route survivorship of biofouling organisms on various vessel types Mar Pollut Bull 54:97–100Google Scholar
  21. Dafforn KA, Glasby TM, Johnston EL (2008) Differential effects of tributyltin and copper anti-foulants on recruitment of non-indigenous species. Biofouling 24:23–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deagle BE, Bax N, Patil JG (2003) Development and evaluation of a PCR-based test for detection of Asterias (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) larvae in Australian plankton samples from ballast water. Mar Freshwater Res 54:709–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. deRivera CE, Ruiz GM, Hines AH, Jivoff P (2005) Biotic resistance to invasion: native predator limits abundance and distribution of an introduced crab. Ecology 86:3364–3376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. deRivera CE, Hitchcock NG, Teck SJ, Steves BP, Hines AH, Ruiz GM (2007) Larval development rate predicts range expansion of an introduced crab. Mar Biol 150:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dethier MN, Hacker SD (2005) Physical factors vs. biotic resistance in controlling the invasion of an estuarine marsh grass. Ecol Appl 15:1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dickman M, Zhang FZ (1999) Mid-ocean exchange of container vessel ballast water. 2: Effects of vessel type in the transport of diatoms and dinoflagellates from Manzanillo, Mexico, to Hong Kong, China. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 176:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Global hotspots of biological invasions: evaluating options for ballast-water management. Proc R Soc Ser B 271:575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Drake JM, Lodge DM (2006) Alee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biol Invas 8:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dudas SE, Dower JF (2006) Reproductive ecology and dispersal potential of varnish clam Nuttallia obscurata, a recent invader in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 320:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duggan IC, Bailey SA, van Overdijk CDA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Invasion risk of active and dia-pausing invertebrates from residual ballast in ships entering Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 324:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dupont L, Jollivet D, Viard F (2003) High genetic diversity and ephemeral drift effects in a successful introduced mollusc (Crepidula fornicata: Gastropoda). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eldredge LG, Carlton J (2002) Hawaiian marine bioinvasions: a preliminary assessment. Pac Sci 56:211–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Floerl O, Inglis GJ (2003) Boat harbour design can exacerbate hull fouling. Aust Ecol 28:116–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Floerl O, Inglis GJ (2005) Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biol Invas 7:589–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Floerl O, Pool TK, Inglis GJ (2004) Positive interactions between nonindigenous species facilitate transport by human vectors. Ecol Appl 14:1724–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Floerl O, Inglis GJ, Marsh HM (2005) Selectivity in vector management: an investigation of the effectiveness of measures used to prevent transport of non-indigenous species. Biol Invas 7:459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gollasch S (2002) The importance of ship hull fouling as a vector of species introductions into the North Sea. Biofouling 18:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gunasekera RM, Patil JG, McEnnulty FR, Bax NJ (2005) Specific amplification of mt-COI gene of the invasive gastropod Maoricolpus roseus in planktonic samples reveals a free-living larval life-history stage. Mar Freshwater Res 56:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gust N, Inglis GJ (2006) Adaptive multi-scale sampling to determine an invasive crab's habitat usage and range in New Zealand. Biol Invas 8:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harding JM, Mann R, Ware Kilduff C (2007) The effects of female size on fecundity in a large marine gastropod Rapana venosa (Muricidae). J Shellfish Res 26:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hayward BW, Stephenson AB, Morley M, Riley JL, Grenfell HR (1997) Faunal changes in Waitemata Harbour sediments, 1930s-1990s. J R Soc N Z 27:1–20Google Scholar
  42. Herbert RJH, Southward AJ, Sheader M, Hawkins SJ (2007) Influence of recruitment and temperature on distribution of intertidal barnacles in the English Channel. J Mar Biol Ass U K 87:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hewitt CL (2002) The distribution and biodiversity of tropical Australian marine bioinvasions. Pac Sci 56:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hewitt C, Campbell M, Thresher R, Martin R (1999) Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Technical Report No 20, CSIRO Marine Research, Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Hobart, Australia, p 344Google Scholar
  45. Hollebone AL, Hay ME (2007) Propagule pressure of an invasive crab overwhelms native biotic resistance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 342:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holloway MG, Keough MJ (2002) An introduced polychaete affects recruitment and larval abundance of sessile invertebrates. Ecol Appl 12:1803–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jelmert A, Van Leeuwen J (2000) Harming local species or preventing the transfer of exotics? Possible negative and positive effects of using zinc anodes for corrosion protection of ballast water tanks. Water Res 34:1937–1940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnston EL, Clark GF (2007) Recipient environment more important than community composition in determining the success of an experimental sponge transplant. Restor Ecol 15Google Scholar
  49. Jones A, Gensemer RW, Stubblefield WA, Van Genderen E, Dethloff GM, Cooper WJ (2006) Toxicity of ozonated seawater to marine organisms. Environ Toxicol Res 25:2683–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keough MJ, Downes BJ (1982) Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of Alee effects. Ecology 85:1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levin PS, Coyer JA, Petrik R, Good TP (2002) Community-wide effects of nonindigenous species on temperate rocky reefs. Ecology 83:3182–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536Google Scholar
  56. Mackie JA, Keough MJ, Christidis L (2006) Invasion patterns inferred from cytochrome oxidase I sequences in three bryozoans, Bugula neritina, Watersipora subtorquata, and Watersipora arcuata. Mar Biol 149:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mann R, Harding JM (2003) Salinity tolerance of larval Rapana venosa: implications for dispersal and establishment of an invading predatory gastropod on the North American Atlantic Coast. Biol Bull 204:96–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martel C, Viard F, Bourguet D, Garcia-Meunier P (2004) Invasion by the marine gastropod Ocinebrellus inornatus in France. II. Expansion along the Atlantic coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 273:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Marzano CN, Liaci SL, Fianchini A, Gravina F, Mercurio M, Corriero G (2003) Distribution, persistence and change in the macrobenthos of the lagoon of Lesina (Apulia, southern Adriatic Sea). Oceanol Acta 26:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller AW, Ruiz GM, Minton MS, Ambrose RF (2007) Differentiating successful and failed mol-luscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 332:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Naeem S, Knops JM, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S (2000) Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2004) The control of the development of a marine benthic community by predation on recruits. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 311:117–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Patti FP, Gambi MC (2001) Phylogeography of the invasive polychaete Sabella spallanzanii (Sabellidae) based on the nucleotide sequence of internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of nuclear rDNA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 215:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2006a) Differential resistance to extended copper exposure in four introduced bryozoans. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2006b) Differential tolerance to metals among populations of the introduced bryozoan Bugula neritina. Mar Biol 148:997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Piola RF, Johnston EL (2008) Pollution reduces native diversity and increases invader dominance in marine hard-substrate communities. Diversity Distrib 14(2):329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Puth L, Post D (2005) Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecol Lett 8:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Radziejewska T, Gruszka P, Rokicka-Praxmajer J (2006) A home away from home: a meiobenthic assemblage in a ship's ballast water tank sediment. Oceanologia 48:259–265Google Scholar
  69. Rajagopal S, Venugopala VP, van der Velde G, Jenner HA (2006) Greening of the coasts: a review of the Perna viridis success story. Aquat Ecol 40:273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roman J (2006) Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader's range. Proc R Soc B 273:2453–2459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rouget M, Richardson DM (2003) Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimecha-nistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am Nat 162:713–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine JW (2001) Climate change, species range limits and body size in marine bivalves. Ecol Lett 4:366–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine JW (2002) Body size and invasion success in marine bivalves. Ecol Lett 5:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ruesink JL (2007) Biotic resistance and facilitation of a non-native oyster on rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 331:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. In: Ruiz G, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 529–547Google Scholar
  77. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH, Bruno JF, Dawson MN, Gaines SD, Grosberg RK, Hastings A, Holt RD, Mayfield MM, O'Connor MI, Rice WR (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecology Evolut 22:465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schiff K, Diehl D, Valkirs AO (2004) Copper emissions from antifouling paint on recreational vessels. Mar Pollut Bull 48:371–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shefer S, Abelson A, Mokady O, Geffen E (2004) Red to Mediterranean Sea bioinvasion: natural drift through the Suez Canal, or anthropogenic transport? Mol Ecol 13:2333–2343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Srinivasan M, Swain GW (2007) Managing the use of copper-based antifouling paints. Environ Manag 39:423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stachowicz JJ, Byrnes JE (2006) Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590Google Scholar
  84. Strathmann MF, Strathmann RR (2006) A vermetid gastropod with complex intracapsular cannibalism of nurse eggs and sibling larvae and a high potential for invasion. Pac Sci 60:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tamburri MN, Wasson K, Matsuda M (2002) Ballast water deoxygenation can prevent aquatic introductions while reducing ship corrosion. Biol Conserv 103:331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley G, Hughes G, Rouget M (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biol 11:2234–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92Google Scholar
  88. Underwood AJ, Keough MJ (2001) Supply-side ecology: the nature and consequences of variations in recruitment of intertidal organisms. In: Bertness M, Gaines S, Hay M (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Maine, pp 183–200Google Scholar
  89. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2003) Establishment of the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in Tasmania depends on disturbance to native algal assemblages. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 295:63–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Valentine JP, Johnson CR (2005) Persistence of the exotic kelp Undaria pinnatifida does not depend on sea urchin grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Valkirs AO, Seligman PF, Haslbeck E, Caso JS (2003) Measurement of copper release rates from antifouling paint under laboratory and in situ conditions: implications for loading estimation to marine water bodies. Mar Pollut Bull 46:763–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Verling E, Ruiz GM, Smith LD, Galil B, Miller AW, Murphy KR (2005) Supply-side invasion ecology: characterizing propagule pressure in coastal ecosystems. Proc R Soc B 272:1249–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Viard F, Ellien C, Dupont L (2006) Dispersal ability and invasion success of Crepidula fornicata in a single gulf: insights from genetic markers and larval-dispersal model. Helgol Mar Res 60:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Waite TD, Kazumi J, Lane PVZ, Farmer LL, Smith SG, Smith SL, Hitchcock G, Cap TR (2003) Removal of natural populations of marine plankton by a large-scale ballast water treatment system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 258:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wasson K, Zabin CJ, Bedinger L, Diaz MC, Pearse JS (2001) Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biol Conserv 102:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Watson DI, O'Riordan RM, Barnes DKA, Cross T (2005) Temporal and spatial variability in the recruitment of barnacles and the local dominance of Elminius modestus Darwin in SW Ireland. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 63:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wonham MJ, Lewis MA, MacIsaac HJ (2005) Minimizing invasion risk by reducing propagule pressure: a model for ballast-water exchange. Front Ecol Environ 3:473–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zabin CJ, Zardus J, Bettini Pitombo F, Fread V, Hadfield MG (2007) A tale of three seas: consistency of natural history traits in a Caribbean-Atlantic barnacle introduced to Hawaii. Biol Invas 9:523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zardi GI, McQuaid CD, Teske PR, Barker NP (2007) Unexpected genetic structure of mussel populations in South Africa: indigenous Perna perna and invasive Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zardus JD, Hadfield MG (2005) Multiple origins and incursions of the Atlantic barnacle Chthamalus proteus in the Pacific. Mol Ecol 14:3719–3733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma L. Johnston
    • 1
  • Richard F. Piola
    • 1
  • Graeme F. Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Evolution and Ecology, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations