Advertisement

Invasions of Estuaries vs the Adjacent Open Coast: A Global Perspective

  • Rikke K. Preisler
  • Kerstin Wasson
  • Wim J. Wolff
  • Megan C. Tyrrell
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 204)

Invasions by alien species have been reported from every marine habitat where surveys have been conducted for them. Conspicuous examples from around the globe include the brown alga Sargassum mangarevense in tropical coral reef sys tems (Andréfouët et al. 2004), the bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis along temperate rocky shores (Steffani and Branch 2003), and the reef-building polychaete, Ficopomatus enigmaticus in estuaries (Schwindt et al. 2004). Despite numerous examples of marine invaders from a variety of habitats, little is known about how invasion rates of entire assemblages of organisms compare between different marine habitat types. And indeed most marine habitats have not been thoroughly surveyed — the majority of our understanding of marine invasions comes from shallow near-shore environments.

Some studies have attempted to quantify habitat differences in marine invasions, examining assemblages (both natives and aliens) at different scales. Within estuarine ecosystems, focus has been on comparisons between different salinities and substrates. (In this chapter an estuary is considered to be a ‘partly enclosed body of water by the coast in which sea water and fresh water mix‘ (Little 2000).) Wolff (1973) examined the benthic macroinvertebrates of four major estuaries in the Netherlands. He found that in the high salinity parts of these estuaries about 2% of the species were alien, in the brackish part about 20%, and in the tidal freshwater part about 8%. In non-tidal brackish waters the share of alien species was about 28%. Wolff (1999) re-analyzed these data and included three more estuaries in the northern Netherlands and Germany. He found that tidal and stagnant low salinity habitats of seven Dutch and German estuaries harbored a higher proportion of alien species (about 20%) than estuarine high salinity habitats (about 6%). This pattern was not clearly related to propagule pressure (harbors and aquaculture were not focused in the middle salinity). Lee et al. (2003) found that patterns of invasion varied along an estuarine gradient in San Francisco Bay; soft-bottom benthic com munities at estuarine salinities were more invaded than communities at either brackish or marine salinities. Wasson et al. (2005) found hard substrates to be more invaded than soft substrates, and a site near the mouth of an estuary to be less invaded than a site nearer the head of an estuary in Central California, despite the harbors in this estuary being closer to the mouth.

Keywords

Alien Species Ballast Water Propagule Pressure Coastal Habitat Invasion Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andréfouët S, Zubia M, Payri C (2004) Mapping and biomass estimation of the invasive brown algae Turbinaria ornate (Turner) J. Agardh and Sargassum mangarevense (Grunow) Setchell on heterogeneous Tahitian coral reefs using 4-meter resolution IKONOS satellite data. Coral Reefs 23(1):26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byers JE (1999) The distribution of an introduced mollusk and its role in the long-term demise of a native confamilial species. Biol Invas 1(4):339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byers JE (2002) Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic altera tion of selection regimes. Oikos 97(3):449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell ML, Hewitt CL (1999) Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. CRIMP Technical Report Number 20. CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, Australia, p 45Google Scholar
  5. Carlton JT (1979) History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific coast of North America. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ecology, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlton JT (1985) Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biol ogy of ballast water. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 23:313–371Google Scholar
  7. Carlton JT (1989) Man's role in changing the face of the ocean: biological invasions and implica tions for conservation of near-shore environments. Conserv Biol 3(3):265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JT (1996) Pattern, process and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biol Conserv 78:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlton JT, Geller JB (1993) Ecological roulette: the global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco bay and delta. A report for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. and The National Sea Grant College Program Connecticut Sea Grant (NOAA Grant Number NA36RG0467)Google Scholar
  11. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen AN, Carlton JT, Fountain MC (1995) Introduction, dispersal and potential impacts of the green crab, Carcinus maenas in San Francisco Bay, California. Mar Biol 122:225–237Google Scholar
  13. Davies KF, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye BD, Melbourne BA, Rice KJ (2005) Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 86:1602–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolgikh AV (1969) Invasion of Hydrobia-ventrosa of the Tiligul estuary by microphallidae larvae. Vestn Zool 3(4):32–35Google Scholar
  15. Edgar GJ, Barrett NS, Graddon DJ, Last PR (2000) The conservation significance of estuaries: a classification of Tasmanian estuaries using ecological, physical and demographic attributes as a case study. Biol Conserv 92:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Emmett R, Llansó R, Newton J, Thom R, Hornberger M, Morgan C, Levings C, Copping A, Fishman P (2000) Geographic signatures of North American West coast estuaries. Estuaries 23(6):765–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM (1995) Spread and potential impact of the recently introduced European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in central California. Mar Biol 122:239–247Google Scholar
  19. Hedgpeth JW (1968) Newcomers to the Pacific coast: the estuarine itinerants. In: Ricketts EF, Calvin J, Hedgpeth JW (eds) Between Pacific tides, 4th edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 376–380Google Scholar
  20. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Thresher RE, Martin RB (1999) Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Crimp technical report number 20. December 1999Google Scholar
  21. Jones LL (1940) An introduction of the Atlantic crab into San Francisco Bay. Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Scientific Congress, vol 3, pp 485–486Google Scholar
  22. Kennish MJ (2002) Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environ Conserv 29(1):78–107Google Scholar
  23. Lee H II, Thompson B, Lowe S (2003) Estuarine and scalar patterns of invasion in the soft-bottom benthic communities of the San Francisco Estuary. Biol Invas 5:85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine JM, D'Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Little C (2000) The biology of soft shores and estuaries. Oxford University Press, New York, N Y, USA, p 133Google Scholar
  26. Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trend Ecol Evol 8:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1976) Species diversity gradients synthesis of the roles of predation competition and temporal heterogeneity. Am Nat 110(973):351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minchin D, Eno C (2002) Exotics of coastal and inland waters of Ireland and Britain. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impact and management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 267–275Google Scholar
  29. Nehring S (2006) Four arguments why so many alien species settle into estuaries, with special reference to the German river Elbe. Helgo Mar Res 60:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reise K, Gollasch S, Wolff WJ (1999) Introduced marine species of the North Sea coasts. Helgo Meeresunters 52:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. Am Zool 37:621–632Google Scholar
  32. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AN (2000) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 31:481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwindt E, Francesco CGD, Iribarne OO (2004) Individual and reef growth of the invasive reef-building polychaete Ficopomatus enigmaticus in a south-western Atlantic coastal lagoon. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 84(5):987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trend Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9:912–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invas 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steffani CN, Branch GM (2003) Growth rate, condition, and shell shape of Mytilus galloprovincialis: responses to wave exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 246:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 1(1):11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Townsend CR, Harper JL, Begon M (2000) Essentials of ecology. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA, USA, pp 552Google Scholar
  40. Tyrrell MC (2002) Impacts of the introduced crab species, Carcinus maenas and Hemigrapsus sanguineus, in northern New England. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  41. Vermeij GJ (1991) When Biotas meet: understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wasson K, Zabin CJ, Bedinger L, Diaz MC, Pearse JS (2001) Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biol Conserv 102:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wasson K, Fenn K, Pearse J (2005) Habitat differences in marine invasions of central California. Biol Invas 7:935–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolff WJ (1971) Origin and history of the brackish-water fauna of NW Europe. Proc 5th European Mar Biol Symposium. Piccin Editore, Padova, pp 11–18Google Scholar
  45. Wolff WJ (1973) The estuary as a habitat. An analysis of data on the soft-bottom macrofauna of the estuarine area of the rivers Rhine, Meuse, and Scheldt. Zool Verh Leiden 126:1–242Google Scholar
  46. Wolff WJ (1999) Exotic invaders of the meso-oligohaline zone of estuaries in the Netherlands: why are there so many? Helgo Meeresunters 52:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolff WJ (2005) Non-indigenous marine and estuarine species in the Netherlands. Zool Meded Leiden 79:1–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rikke K. Preisler
    • 1
  • Kerstin Wasson
    • 2
  • Wim J. Wolff
    • 3
  • Megan C. Tyrrell
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Ocean HealthUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research ReserveWatsonvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Marine Benthic Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of GroningenHarenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Wells National Estuarine Research ReserveWellsUSA

Personalised recommendations