Advertisement

Four Centuries of Biological Invasions in Tidal Waters of the Chesapeake Bay Region

  • Paul W. Fofonoff
  • Gregory M. Ruiz
  • Anson H. Hines
  • Brian D. Steves
  • James T. Carlton
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 204)

Biological invasions are prevalent in marine ecosystems throughout the world. Several studies demonstrate that the number and abundance of non-native species have increased dramatically in recent time (Cohen and Carlton 1998; Cranfield et al. 1998; Reise et al. 1999; Ruiz et al. 2000a; Hewitt et al. 2004). Although the impact of many non-native populations remains unexplored, it is also evident that some species have fundamentally altered the structure and function of marine systems (Ruiz et al. 1999; Crooks 2001; Carlton 2001).

Most marine invasions are known from protected waters of bays and estuaries, instead of exposed outer coasts (Chap. 33, Preisler et al.). This results at least partly from the concentration of human activities surrounding estuaries, creating many transfer mechanisms (vectors) for the human-aided movement of organisms from other global regions. Most of the world's trade occurs by shipping among ports, concentrated in bays and estuaries, creating opportunities for species transfers associated with ships' hulls and ballasted materials (Carlton 1985). In addition, bays are foci for many other activities known to transfer organisms, such as aquaculture, fishing, and outdoor recreation. Estuaries also represent an intersection between marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments, and potentially can be invaded by organisms from each of these adjacent regions. Although estuaries include a diverse range of habitats and have undergone many anthropogenic changes, both potentially affecting colonization by non-native species, it appears certain that the propagule supply moved among bays is an important driver for the predominance of non-native species in more protected waters.

Keywords

Biological Invasion Ballast Water Tidal Water Nonnative Species Purple Loosestrife 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bickley WE, Seek TR (1975) Insects in four Maryland marshes. Agric Exp Sta Univ Maryl College Park, MD: Misc Publs 870:1–27Google Scholar
  2. Boyd MJ, Mulligan TJ, Shaughnessy FJ (2002) Non-indigenous marine species of Humboldt Bay, California. Calif Dep Fish Game. State Water Resource Control Bd, Natl Fish Wildlife Foundation, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown ML, Reveal JL, Broome CR, Frick GF (1987) Comments on the vegetation of colonial Maryland. Huntia 7:247–283Google Scholar
  4. Brush GS (2001) Forests along the colonial Chesapeake. In: Curtin PD, Brush GS, Fisher GW (eds) Discovering the Chesapeake: the history of an ecosystem. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 40–59Google Scholar
  5. Burreson EM, Stokes NA, Friedman CS (2000) Increased virulence in an introduced pathogen: Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) in the Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica. J Aquat Anim Health 12:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calder DR (1971) Hydroids and hydromedusae of southern Chesapeake Bay. Spec Sci Rep Virginia Inst Mar Sci 1:1–125Google Scholar
  7. Carlton JT (1979) History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific Coast of North America. PhD dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlton JT (1985) Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 23:313–371Google Scholar
  9. Carlton JT (1996) Patterns, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biol Conserv 78:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlton JT (2001) Introduced species in coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities. Pew Oceans Commission, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlton JT, Reid D, van Leeuwen, H (1995) The role of shipping in the introduction of nonindige-nous aquatic organisms to the coastal waters of the United States (other than the Great Lakes) and an analysis of control options. Report to US Coast Guard, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter V, Rybicki, NB (1994) Invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes in the tidal Potomac River and estuary, the Currituck Sound-Back Bay system, and the Pamlico River estuary. Lake Reserv Manag 10:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman JW (2000) Climate effects on the geography of nonindigenous peracaridan crustacean introductions in estuaries. In: Pederson J (ed) Marine bioinvasions, Proceeding of a conference, January 24–27. MIT Sea Grant College Program, pp 66–80Google Scholar
  14. Chesapeake Bay Program (2000) Chesapeake Bay: introduction to an ecosystem- Wetlands. Retrieved from http://www.chesapeakebay.net/info/ecoint5a.cfm on 30 January 2006
  15. Christmas J, Eades R, Cincotta D, Shiels A, Miller R, Siemien J, Sinnot T, Fuller P (1998) History, management, and status of introduced fishes in the Chesapeake Bay basin. In: Therres GD (ed) Conservation of biological diversity: a key to restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and beyond. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark SF (1878) A new locality for Cordylophora. Am Nat 12:231–234Google Scholar
  17. Clarke SF (1882) New and interesting hydroids from Chesapeake Bay. Mem Boston Soc Nat Hist 3:135–141Google Scholar
  18. Cohen AN (1997) Have claw, will travel. Aquat Nuisance Species Digest 2:16–17Google Scholar
  19. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Sea Grant College Program (Connecticut Sea Grant). Washington DC, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen AN, Mills CE, Berry H, Wonham MJ, Bingham B, Bookheim B, Carlton J, Chapman J, Cordell J, Harris L, Klinger T, Kohn A, Lambert C, Lambert G, Li K, Secord D, Toft J (1998) Puget Sound expedition: a rapid assessment survey of non-indigenous species in the shallow waters of Puget Sound. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WAGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen AN, Berry HD, Mills CE, Milne D, Britton-Simmons K, Wonham MJ, Secord DL, Barkas JA, Bingham B, Bookheim BE, Byers JE, Chapman JW, Cordell JR, Dumbauld B, Fukuyama A, Harris LH, Kohn AJ, Li K, Mumford TF Jr, Radashevsky V, Sewell AT, Welch K (2001) Washington State Exotics Expedition 2000: a rapid survey of exotic species in the shallow waters of Elliott Bay, Totten and Eld Inlets, and Willapa Bay. The Nearshore Habitat Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WAGoogle Scholar
  23. Cope ED (1869) On the distribution of fishes in the Allegheny region of southwestern Virginia. J Acad Nat Sci Phil 6:207–249Google Scholar
  24. Counts CL III (1986) The zoogeography and history of the invasion of the United States by Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae). Am Malacol Bull, Spec Ed 2:7–39Google Scholar
  25. Cowles RP (1930) A biological study of the offshore waters of Chesapeake Bay. Fish Bull 46:277–381Google Scholar
  26. Cranfield HJ, Gordon DP, Willan RC, Marshall BA, Battershill CN, Francis MP, Nelson WA, Glasby CJ, Read GB (1998) Adventive marine species in New Zealand. NIWA Tech Rep 34:1–48Google Scholar
  27. Crooks JA (2001) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow motion. Ecoscience 12:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crooks JA, Soulé ME (1999) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken Å (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp 103–125Google Scholar
  30. Dall WH (1889) A preliminary catalogue of the shell-bearing marine mollusks and brachiopods of the south-eastern coast of the United States. Bull US Natl Mus 37:1–221Google Scholar
  31. Dauer DM, Stokes TL, Barker HR, Ewing MR, Sourbreer JW (1984) Macrobenthic communities of the lower Chesapeake Bay. I V. Bay-wide transects and the inner continental shelf. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 69:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dauer DM, Weisberg SB, Ranasinghe (2000) Relationships between benthic community condition, water quality, sediment quality, nutrient loads, and land use patterns in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 23:80–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davison SG, Merwin JG, Capper J, Power G, Shivers FR Jr (1997) Chesapeake waters: four centuries of controversy, concern, and legislation. Tidewater Publishers, Centerville MDGoogle Scholar
  34. Drake JM (2004) Risk analysis for invasive species and emerging infectious diseases: concepts and applications. Am Midl Nat 153:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunn CP, Sharitz R (1990) The history of Murdannia keisak (Commelinaceae) in the southeastern United States. Castanea 66:122–129Google Scholar
  36. Elton CS (1959) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Fofonoff PW, Ruiz GM, Steves B, Carlton JT (2003) In ships or on ships? Mechanisms of transfer and invasion for nonnative species to the coasts of North America. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vector and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, pp 152–182Google Scholar
  38. Gronovius JF (1739) Flora Virginica exhibens plantas quas V. C. Johannes Clayton in Virginia observavit atque collegit. Cornelius Haak, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Thresher RE, Martin RB, Boyd S, Cohen BF, Currie DR, Gomon MF, Keough MJ, Lewis JA, Lockett MM, Mays N, McArthur MA, O'Hara TD, Poore GC, Ross DJ, Storey MJ, Watson JE, Wilson RS (2004) Introduced and cryptogenic and species in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia. Mar Biol 144:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacobson PT, Kartalia SD (1994) Ecological risk assessment of the effects of grass carp on submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay. In: Hill P, Nelson S (eds) Toward a sustainable coastal watershed: the Chesapeake experiment. Proceedings of a Conference. Chesapeake Research Consortium, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins RE, Burkhead NM (1993) Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda MDGoogle Scholar
  42. Jewett EB, Hines AH, Ruiz GM (2003) Epifaunal disturbance by periodic low levels of dissolved oxygen: native vs. invasive species response. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 304:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jokinen EH (1982) Cipangopaludina chinensis (Gastropoda: Viviparidae) in North America, review and update. Nautilus 96:89–95Google Scholar
  44. Kennedy VS (1995) Ecological role of the Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica with remarks on disease. J Shellfish Res 15:177–183Google Scholar
  45. Kennedy VS Mountford K (2001) Human influences on aquatic resources in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In: Curtin PD, Brush GS, Fisher GW (eds) Discovering the Chesapeake: the history of an ecosystem. Johns Hopkins Baltimore, pp 191–219Google Scholar
  46. Kessel B (1953) Distribution and migration of the European starling in North America. Condor 55:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kingsley JS (1879) On a collection of Crustacea from Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida, with a revision of the genera of Crangonidae and Palaemonidae. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila 31:383–427Google Scholar
  48. Knepper DA, Johnson DM, Musselman LJ (2002) Marsilea mutica in Virginia. Am Fern J 92:243–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kutzbach JE, Webb T III (2001) Climate and climate history in the Chesapeake Bay region. In: Curtin PD, Brush GS, Fisher GW (eds) Discovering the Chesapeake: the history of an ecosystem. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, pp 15–39Google Scholar
  51. Light T, Grosholz E, Moyle P (2005) Delta ecological survey (phase1): nonindigenous aquatic species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a literature review. US Fish and Wildlife Service Stockton, CAGoogle Scholar
  52. Mann R, Harding JM (2000) Invasion of the North American Atlantic Coast by a large predatory Asian mollusc. Biol Invas 2:7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maryland State Archives (2006) Maryland at a glance — aquaculture. Retrieved from http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/html/aqua.html
  54. Mathieson AC, Fuller SW (1969) A preliminary investigation of the benthonic marine algae of the Chesapeake Bay region. Rhodora 71:524–534Google Scholar
  55. Miller AW, Ruiz GM, Minton MS, Ambrose RF (2007) Differentiating successful and failed molluscan invaders in estuarine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 332:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mills EL, Leach JH, Carlton JT, Secor CL (1993) Exotic species in the Great Lakes: a history of biotic crises and anthropogenic introductions. J Great Lakes Res 19:1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mills EL, Scheuerell MD, Carlton JT, Strayer D (1997) Biological invasions in the Hudson River: an inventory and historical analysis. New York State Mus Circ 57:1–51Google Scholar
  58. National Research Council (2003) Non-native oysters in the Chesapeake Bay. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  59. NEMESIS (2005) National Estuarine and Marine Exotic Species Information System. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Marine Invasions Laboratory. Retrieved from http://invasions.si.edu/nemesis/chesapeake.html in 2005
  60. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Savini D (2003) Biological invasions as a component of global change in stressed marine ecosystems. Mar Pollut Bull 46:542–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Orrell TM, Weigt L (2005) The Northern Snakehead Channa argus, a non-indigenous fish in the Potomac River, U.S.A. Proc Biol Soc Wash 118:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Orris PK (1980) A revised species list and commentary on the macroalgae of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. Estuaries 3:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Paul RW (2001) Geographical signatures of Middle Atlantic estuaries: historical layers. Estuaries 24:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paradiso JL (1969) Mammals of Maryland. U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  65. Phelps HL (1994) The Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac. Estuaries 17:614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reise K, Gollasch S, Wolff WJ (1999) Introduced marine species of the North Sea coasts. Helgol Meeresunters 52:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reveal JL (1983) Significance of pre-1753 botanical explorations in temperate North America on Linnaeus' first edition of Species Plantarum. Phytologia 53:1–96Google Scholar
  68. Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (2003) Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, pp 459–504Google Scholar
  69. Ruiz GM, Hewitt CL (2002) Toward understanding patterns of coastal marine invasions: a prospectus. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff P, Hines AH (1999) Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnol Oceanogr 44:950–972Google Scholar
  71. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Carlton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH (2000a) Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruiz GM, Rawlings TK, Dobbs FC, Drake LA, Mullady T, Huq A, Colwell RR (2000b) Global spread of microorganisms by ships. Nature 408:49–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Say T (1817) An account of the Crustacea of the United States. J Acad Nat Sci Phila 1:57–63, 65–80, 97–101Google Scholar
  74. Schubel JR, Pritchard DW (1987) A brief physical description of the Chesapeake Bay. In: Majumdar SK, Hall LW Jr, Austin, HM (eds) Contaminant problems and management of living Chesapeake Bay resources. Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences, Easton, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  75. Simmons SW, Dove WE (1941) Breeding places of the Stablefly or ‘Dog Fly’ Stomoxys calcitrans (L) in northwestern Florida. J Econ Entomol 34:457–462Google Scholar
  76. Smith HM (1907) Our fish immigrants. Natl Geogr 18:385–400Google Scholar
  77. Smith HM, Bean BA (1898) List of fishes known to inhabit the waters of the District of Columbia and vicinity. Bull US Fish Commiss 18:179–187Google Scholar
  78. Smith LD, Wonham MJ, McCann LD, Ruiz GM, Hines AH, Carlton JT (1999) Invasion pressure to a ballast-flooded estuary and an assessment of inoculant survival. Biol Invas 1:67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stimpson W (1859) Notes on North American Crustacea, in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Ann Lyceum Nat Hist New York 7:49–93Google Scholar
  80. Stimpson W (1871) Notes on North American Crustacea, in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, No.III. Ann Lyceum Nat Hist New York 7:92–136Google Scholar
  81. Thompson ML (1993) Dynamics of an oligohaline, macrofaunal, fouling community. MS. Thesis, College of William and Mary, WilliamsburgGoogle Scholar
  82. Uhler PR, Lugger O (1876) List of the fishes of Maryland. In: Report of Commissioners of Fisheries of Maryland, pp 81–208Google Scholar
  83. Wass ML (1963) Check list of the marine invertebrates of Virginia. Spec Sci Rep Virginia Inst Mar Sci 24:1–36Google Scholar
  84. Wass ML (1972) A checklist of the biota of lower Chesapeake Bay. Spec Sci Rep Virginia Inst Mar Sci 65:1–20Google Scholar
  85. Wasson K, Toft J, Von Holle B, Ruiz GM (2000) Detecting invasions of marine organisms: kamptozoan case histories. Biol Invas 2:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wasson K, Zabin CJ, Bedinger L, Diaz MC, Pearse JS (2001) Ecological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biol Conserv 102:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Webster HE (1879) Annelida Chaetopoda of the Virginia coast. Trans Albany Inst 9:202–269Google Scholar
  88. Wennersten JR (2001) The Chesapeake: an environmental biography. Maryland Historical Society, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  89. Whitfield P, Gardner T, Vives SP, Gilligan MR, Courtenay WR Jr, Ray GC, Hare J (2002) Biological invasion of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans, along the Atlantic coast of North America. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  91. Wonham MJ, Carlton JT (2005) Trends in marine biological invasions at local and regional scales: the Northeast Pacific Ocean as a model system. Biol Invas 7:369–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wulff BL, Wulff EM, Robison BH, Lowry JK, Humm HJ (1968) Summer marine algae of the jetty at Ocean City, Maryland. Chesapeake Sci 6:56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zaneveld J (1966) The marine algae of the American coast between Cape May NJ and Cape Hatteras, NC. Bot Mar 9:101–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zaneveld J, Barnes WD (1965) Reproductive periodicities of some benthic algae in lower Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Sci 6:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul W. Fofonoff
    • 1
  • Gregory M. Ruiz
    • 2
  • Anson H. Hines
    • 1
  • Brian D. Steves
    • 1
  • James T. Carlton
    • 3
  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  3. 3.Maritime Studies ProgramWilliams College-Mystic SeaportMysticUSA

Personalised recommendations