Advertisement

An Overview of Risk Assessment in a Marine Biosecurity Context

  • Marnie L. Campbell
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 204)

Our ability to manage the variety of human induced stresses in the marine environment is hampered by limited resources, a lack of fundamental knowledge and the absence of appropriate tools (Lubchenco et al. 1991; Norse 1993). This is particularly true when faced with introduced marine species. Structured and transparent evaluation techniques that both determine and justify management decisions are needed to effectively deal with introduced marine species in both an ecological and socio-political sense (as discussed by Hewitt et al., Chap. 33). Coupling this need with knowledge, resource and data limitations has led decision makers and management to use risk assessment as a means to direct their actions.

In simple terms, risk assessment is a method of evaluating the likelihood that an event may occur and the consequences of such an event. In general, ecological risk assessment proceeds by establishing the context (e.g., introduced species in a region; hazard analysis); identifying the risk, hazards and effects (e.g., impacts on core values); assessing those risks (analyse and evaluate the risks); and treating the risk(s) (e.g., incursion response activity, mitigation, Australian Risk Management Guidelines; Standards Australia 2000, 2004). A measure of risk is derived by multiplying likelihood by consequence. Hazard analysis (a technique often confused with risk assessment) determines the actions, events, substances, environmental conditions, or species that could result in an undesired event, but does not identify the likelihood or the level of consequence. Introduced species, vectors or transport pathways are all examples of hazards.

Keywords

Risk Assessment World Trade Organisation Precautionary Principle United Nations Environmental Programme Decision Tree Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandrov B, Bashtannyy R, Clarke, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Polglaze J, Rabotnyov V, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Odessa, Ukraine. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 10. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  2. Andow DA (2003) Pathways-based risk assessment of exotic species invasions. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Bioinvasions: pathways, vectors, and management strategies. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 439–455Google Scholar
  3. Anil AC, Clarke C, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Joshi G, Krishnamurthy V, Polglaze J, Sawant S, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, ports of Mumbai and Jawaharlal Nehru, India. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 11. IMO, London.<http://globallast.imo.org/index. asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  4. Anon (2005) Import health standard for the importation into New Zealand of ornamental fish and marine invertebrates from all countries. Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington. <http://www. biosecurity.govt.nz/files//imports/animals/standards/fisornic.all.pdf> accessed 28/01/2006
  5. Awad A, Clarke C, Greyling L, Hilliard R, Polglaze J, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Saldanha Bay, Republic of South Africa. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 13. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  6. Biosecurity Australia (2000) Draft import risk analysis report for prawns and prawn products. Biosecurity Australia, Canberra. <http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0012/42141/00-041a.pdf> accessed 02/09/2007Google Scholar
  7. Burgman MA, Ferson A, Akcakaya HR (1993) Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. BWM (2005) The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship's Ballast Water and Sediments. Adopted 13 February 2004. The International Maritime Organisation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron J (1993) The precautionary principle — core meaning, constitutional framework and procedures for implementation. Precautionary Principle Conference, Institute of Environmental Studies, University of New South Wales, September 1993Google Scholar
  10. Campbell ML (2004) Microalgae importation decision-tree — user notes. Biosecurity New Zealand, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell ML (2005a) Risk assessment (modified organism impact assessment) to update information on Undaria pinnatifida. All Oceans Ecology Client Report AOE2005-03Google Scholar
  12. Campbell ML (2005b) Risk Analysis for introducing marine species for aquaculture purposes: practical examples. Chilean Aquaculture Risk Assessment Workshop, Valparaiso, Chile. 20–31 March 2005Google Scholar
  13. Campbell ML (2005c) Organism impact assessment (OIA) for potential impacts of Didymosphenia geminata. All Ocean Ecology Client Report AOE2005-02 prepared for Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington. <http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests-diseases/plants/didymo/didymo-org-ia-oct-05.pdf> accessed 04/09/2007
  14. Campbell ML (2005d) A draft guide to risk analysis/assessment. All Ocean Ecology Client Report AOE2005-04 prepared for the Regional Activities Center for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA, UNEP), TunisiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlton JT (2001) Introduced species in US coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke C, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Kayvanrad N, Taymourtash H, Parhizi A, Yavari V, Raaymakers S (2003) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Khark Island, Islamic Republic of Iran. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 8. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph. htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  17. Clarke C, Hilliard R, Junqueira A de OR, Neto A, Polgaze J, Raaymakers S (2004a) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Sepetiba, Federal Republic of Brazil. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 14. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  18. Clarke C, Hilliard R, Liuy Y, Polglaze J, Zhao D, Xu X, Raaymakers S (2004b) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Dalian, People's Republic of China. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 12. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007
  19. Cooney R (2004) Precaution and invasive alien species: challenges at the interface of trade and environment regimes. Paper given at ‘Biodiversity loss and species extinction: managing risk in a changing world.’ World Conservation Forum, 18–20 November 2004, Bangkok, Thailand. <www.iucn.org/congress/wcforum/forum_th_biodiversity-proceed.htm> ; accessed 28/01/2006
  20. Cooney R (2005) From promise to practicalities: the precautionary principle in biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. In: Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle. Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. Earthscan, London, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  21. Cooney R, Dickson B (2005) Precautionary principle, precautionary practice: lessons and insights. In: Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle. Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. Earthscan, London, pp 288–298Google Scholar
  22. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van der Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler B (2005) Strategic environmental assessment. A sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. Earthscan; LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2005) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services In: Kalof L, Satterfield T (eds) Environmental values. Earthscan, London, pp 18–40Google Scholar
  25. Gollasch S (1996) Untersuchungen des Arteintrages durch den internationalen Schiffsverkehr unter besonderer Berücksichtigung nichtheimischer Arten. Dr. Kovac; Hamburg (Diss.)Google Scholar
  26. Gollasch S, Leppäkoski E (1999) Initial risk assessment of alien species in Nordic waters. Nordic Council of Ministers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  27. Gollasch S, David M, Voight M, Dragsund E, Hewitt C, Fukuyo Y (2007) Critical review of the IMO international convention on the management of ships' ballast water and sediments. Harmful Algae 6(4):585–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gullett W (1997) Environmental protection and the “precautionary principle”: a response to scientific uncertainty in environmental management. Environ Plan Law J 14(1):52–69Google Scholar
  29. Handl G (1990) Environmental security and global change: the challenge to international law. YBK Int'l Environmental L 3Google Scholar
  30. Harwood J, Stokes K (2003) Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 18:617–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayes KR (2003) Biosecurity and the role of risk-assessment. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Bioinvasions: pathways, vectors, and management strategies. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 382–414Google Scholar
  32. Hayes KR, Hewitt CL (2001) Ballast-water risk assessment – vol II. CRIMP Tech Rep 21. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayes KR, Sliwa C (2003) Identifying potential marine pests – a deductive approach applied to Australia. Mar Poll Bull 46:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazardous Substances and New Organism Act (1996) New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. <http://www.mfe.govt.nz/laws/hsno.html> accessed 04/09/2007
  35. Herborg L-M, Jerde CL, Lodge DM, Ruiz GM, MacIsaac HJ (2007) Predicting invasion risk using measures of introduction effort and environmental niche models. Ecol Appl 17(3):663–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML (2005) Applying risk analysis to marine aquaculture species. Chilean Aquaculture Risk Assessment Workshop, Valparaiso, Chile. 20–31 March 2005Google Scholar
  37. Hewitt CL, Hayes KR (2001) Marine biosecurity and risk assessment. Proceedings of the Quarantine and Market Access Conference, Canberra, act, Australia, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  38. Hewitt CL, Hayes KR (2002) Risk assessment of marine biological invasions. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impact and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 456–466Google Scholar
  39. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Gollasch S (2006) Alien species in aquaculture. Considerations for responsible use. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  40. ICES (2005) ICES code of practice on the introductions and transfers of marine organisms 2005 <http://www.ices.dk/reports/general/2004/ICES%20Code%20of%20Practice%202005.pdf.>; accessed 28/01/2006
  41. Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Services [FAO] 2003. Health management and biosecu-rity maintenance in white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) hatcheries in Latin America. FAO Fisheries Tech Pap 450. FAO, Rome. <ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5040e/y5040e00.pdf> accessed 04/08/2007
  42. Kahn SA, Wilson DW, Perera RP, Hayder H, Gerrity SE (1999) Import risk analysis on live ornamental finfish. AQIS, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalof L, Satterfield T (2005) Environmental values. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lang R, Armour A (1981) The assessment and review of social impacts. Federal Environmental Assessment Office, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  46. Leung KMY, Dudgeon D (2007) Ecological (pest) risk assessment and management. FAO/NACA Workshop on Understanding and Applying Risk Analysis in Aquaculture, 8–11 June 2007. Rayong, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  47. Lodge DM, Williams S, MacIsaac HJ, Hayes KR, Leung B, Reichard S, Mack RN, Moyle PB, Smith M, Andow DA, Carlton JY, McMichael A (2006) Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol Appl 16(6):2035–2054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubchenco J, Olson AM, Brubaker LB, Carpenter SR, Holland MM, Hubbell SP, Levin SA, MacMahon JA, Matson PA, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Peterson CH, Pulliam HR, Real LA, Regal PJ, Risser PG (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marsden S, Dovers S (2002) Strategic environmental assessment in Australasia. The Federation Press, MarrickvilleGoogle Scholar
  50. New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (1996) EIS guidelines: extractive industries, dredging and other extraction in riparian and coastal areas. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning; SydneyGoogle Scholar
  51. New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (2000) Coal mines, and associated infrastructure: EIS guideline. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning; SydneyGoogle Scholar
  52. Norse EA (ed) (1993) Global marine biological diversity: a strategy for building conservation into decision making. Centre for Marine Conservation, IUCN/WWF/UNEP, The World Bank. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Pagiola S (2004) How much is an ecosystem worth? Assessing the economic value of conservation. IUCN, The Nature Conservancy, The World Bank; Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  54. Peel J (2005) The precautionary principle in practice. Environmental decision-making and scientific uncertainty. The Federation Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  55. Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, Ricciardi A, MacIssac HJ (2005) Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biol Invas 14(6):1365–1381Google Scholar
  56. Roberts MH, Newman MC, Hale RC (2002) Overview of ecological risk assessment in coastal and estuarine environments. In: Newman MC, Roberts MH, Hale RC (eds) Coastal and estua-rine risk assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  57. SPS Agreement (1994) Sanitary and phytosanitary measures. World Trade Organisation <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm>; accessed 28/01/2006
  58. Standards Australia (2000) Environmental risk management, edn 3. Standards Australia, Homebush, NSWGoogle Scholar
  59. Standards Australia (2004) Risk management guidelines: companion to AS/NZS4360:2004. Standards Australia; Homebush, NSWGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas I, Elliott M (2005) Environmental impact theory and practice assessment in Australia, edn 4. The Federation Press, MarrickvilleGoogle Scholar
  61. Toman M (1998) Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marnie L. Campbell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Conservation and Ecology, National Centre for Marine Conservation & Resource SustainabilityAustralian Maritime CollegeNewnhamAustralia

Personalised recommendations