Skip to main content

An Overview of Risk Assessment in a Marine Biosecurity Context

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 204))

Our ability to manage the variety of human induced stresses in the marine environment is hampered by limited resources, a lack of fundamental knowledge and the absence of appropriate tools (Lubchenco et al. 1991; Norse 1993). This is particularly true when faced with introduced marine species. Structured and transparent evaluation techniques that both determine and justify management decisions are needed to effectively deal with introduced marine species in both an ecological and socio-political sense (as discussed by Hewitt et al., Chap. 33). Coupling this need with knowledge, resource and data limitations has led decision makers and management to use risk assessment as a means to direct their actions.

In simple terms, risk assessment is a method of evaluating the likelihood that an event may occur and the consequences of such an event. In general, ecological risk assessment proceeds by establishing the context (e.g., introduced species in a region; hazard analysis); identifying the risk, hazards and effects (e.g., impacts on core values); assessing those risks (analyse and evaluate the risks); and treating the risk(s) (e.g., incursion response activity, mitigation, Australian Risk Management Guidelines; Standards Australia 2000, 2004). A measure of risk is derived by multiplying likelihood by consequence. Hazard analysis (a technique often confused with risk assessment) determines the actions, events, substances, environmental conditions, or species that could result in an undesired event, but does not identify the likelihood or the level of consequence. Introduced species, vectors or transport pathways are all examples of hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexandrov B, Bashtannyy R, Clarke, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Polglaze J, Rabotnyov V, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Odessa, Ukraine. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 10. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Andow DA (2003) Pathways-based risk assessment of exotic species invasions. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Bioinvasions: pathways, vectors, and management strategies. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 439–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil AC, Clarke C, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Joshi G, Krishnamurthy V, Polglaze J, Sawant S, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, ports of Mumbai and Jawaharlal Nehru, India. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 11. IMO, London.<http://globallast.imo.org/index. asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Anon (2005) Import health standard for the importation into New Zealand of ornamental fish and marine invertebrates from all countries. Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington. <http://www. biosecurity.govt.nz/files//imports/animals/standards/fisornic.all.pdf> accessed 28/01/2006

  • Awad A, Clarke C, Greyling L, Hilliard R, Polglaze J, Raaymakers S (2004) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Saldanha Bay, Republic of South Africa. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 13. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Biosecurity Australia (2000) Draft import risk analysis report for prawns and prawn products. Biosecurity Australia, Canberra. <http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0012/42141/00-041a.pdf> accessed 02/09/2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA, Ferson A, Akcakaya HR (1993) Risk assessment in conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • BWM (2005) The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship's Ballast Water and Sediments. Adopted 13 February 2004. The International Maritime Organisation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron J (1993) The precautionary principle — core meaning, constitutional framework and procedures for implementation. Precautionary Principle Conference, Institute of Environmental Studies, University of New South Wales, September 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell ML (2004) Microalgae importation decision-tree — user notes. Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell ML (2005a) Risk assessment (modified organism impact assessment) to update information on Undaria pinnatifida. All Oceans Ecology Client Report AOE2005-03

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell ML (2005b) Risk Analysis for introducing marine species for aquaculture purposes: practical examples. Chilean Aquaculture Risk Assessment Workshop, Valparaiso, Chile. 20–31 March 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell ML (2005c) Organism impact assessment (OIA) for potential impacts of Didymosphenia geminata. All Ocean Ecology Client Report AOE2005-02 prepared for Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington. <http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests-diseases/plants/didymo/didymo-org-ia-oct-05.pdf> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Campbell ML (2005d) A draft guide to risk analysis/assessment. All Ocean Ecology Client Report AOE2005-04 prepared for the Regional Activities Center for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA, UNEP), Tunisia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (2001) Introduced species in US coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke C, Hayes T, Hilliard R, Kayvanrad N, Taymourtash H, Parhizi A, Yavari V, Raaymakers S (2003) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Khark Island, Islamic Republic of Iran. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 8. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph. htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Clarke C, Hilliard R, Junqueira A de OR, Neto A, Polgaze J, Raaymakers S (2004a) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Sepetiba, Federal Republic of Brazil. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 14. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Clarke C, Hilliard R, Liuy Y, Polglaze J, Zhao D, Xu X, Raaymakers S (2004b) Ballast water risk assessment, port of Dalian, People's Republic of China. GloBallast Monogr Ser No 12. IMO, London. <http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=monograph.htm&menu=true> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Cooney R (2004) Precaution and invasive alien species: challenges at the interface of trade and environment regimes. Paper given at ‘Biodiversity loss and species extinction: managing risk in a changing world.’ World Conservation Forum, 18–20 November 2004, Bangkok, Thailand. <www.iucn.org/congress/wcforum/forum_th_biodiversity-proceed.htm> ; accessed 28/01/2006

  • Cooney R (2005) From promise to practicalities: the precautionary principle in biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. In: Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle. Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. Earthscan, London, pp 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney R, Dickson B (2005) Precautionary principle, precautionary practice: lessons and insights. In: Cooney R, Dickson B (eds) Biodiversity and the precautionary principle. Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. Earthscan, London, pp 288–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van der Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal-Clayton B, Sadler B (2005) Strategic environmental assessment. A sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. Earthscan; London

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2005) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services In: Kalof L, Satterfield T (eds) Environmental values. Earthscan, London, pp 18–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S (1996) Untersuchungen des Arteintrages durch den internationalen Schiffsverkehr unter besonderer Berücksichtigung nichtheimischer Arten. Dr. Kovac; Hamburg (Diss.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S, Leppäkoski E (1999) Initial risk assessment of alien species in Nordic waters. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S, David M, Voight M, Dragsund E, Hewitt C, Fukuyo Y (2007) Critical review of the IMO international convention on the management of ships' ballast water and sediments. Harmful Algae 6(4):585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullett W (1997) Environmental protection and the “precautionary principle”: a response to scientific uncertainty in environmental management. Environ Plan Law J 14(1):52–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Handl G (1990) Environmental security and global change: the challenge to international law. YBK Int'l Environmental L 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood J, Stokes K (2003) Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 18:617–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR (2003) Biosecurity and the role of risk-assessment. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds) Bioinvasions: pathways, vectors, and management strategies. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 382–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Hewitt CL (2001) Ballast-water risk assessment – vol II. CRIMP Tech Rep 21. CSIRO Division of Marine Research, Hobart, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KR, Sliwa C (2003) Identifying potential marine pests – a deductive approach applied to Australia. Mar Poll Bull 46:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazardous Substances and New Organism Act (1996) New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. <http://www.mfe.govt.nz/laws/hsno.html> accessed 04/09/2007

  • Herborg L-M, Jerde CL, Lodge DM, Ruiz GM, MacIsaac HJ (2007) Predicting invasion risk using measures of introduction effort and environmental niche models. Ecol Appl 17(3):663–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL, Campbell ML (2005) Applying risk analysis to marine aquaculture species. Chilean Aquaculture Risk Assessment Workshop, Valparaiso, Chile. 20–31 March 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL, Hayes KR (2001) Marine biosecurity and risk assessment. Proceedings of the Quarantine and Market Access Conference, Canberra, act, Australia, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL, Hayes KR (2002) Risk assessment of marine biological invasions. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impact and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 456–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Gollasch S (2006) Alien species in aquaculture. Considerations for responsible use. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • ICES (2005) ICES code of practice on the introductions and transfers of marine organisms 2005 <http://www.ices.dk/reports/general/2004/ICES%20Code%20of%20Practice%202005.pdf.>; accessed 28/01/2006

  • Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Services [FAO] 2003. Health management and biosecu-rity maintenance in white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) hatcheries in Latin America. FAO Fisheries Tech Pap 450. FAO, Rome. <ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5040e/y5040e00.pdf> accessed 04/08/2007

  • Kahn SA, Wilson DW, Perera RP, Hayder H, Gerrity SE (1999) Import risk analysis on live ornamental finfish. AQIS, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalof L, Satterfield T (2005) Environmental values. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang R, Armour A (1981) The assessment and review of social impacts. Federal Environmental Assessment Office, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung KMY, Dudgeon D (2007) Ecological (pest) risk assessment and management. FAO/NACA Workshop on Understanding and Applying Risk Analysis in Aquaculture, 8–11 June 2007. Rayong, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Williams S, MacIsaac HJ, Hayes KR, Leung B, Reichard S, Mack RN, Moyle PB, Smith M, Andow DA, Carlton JY, McMichael A (2006) Biological invasions: recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol Appl 16(6):2035–2054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Olson AM, Brubaker LB, Carpenter SR, Holland MM, Hubbell SP, Levin SA, MacMahon JA, Matson PA, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Peterson CH, Pulliam HR, Real LA, Regal PJ, Risser PG (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden S, Dovers S (2002) Strategic environmental assessment in Australasia. The Federation Press, Marrickville

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (1996) EIS guidelines: extractive industries, dredging and other extraction in riparian and coastal areas. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning; Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning (2000) Coal mines, and associated infrastructure: EIS guideline. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning; Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Norse EA (ed) (1993) Global marine biological diversity: a strategy for building conservation into decision making. Centre for Marine Conservation, IUCN/WWF/UNEP, The World Bank. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola S (2004) How much is an ecosystem worth? Assessing the economic value of conservation. IUCN, The Nature Conservancy, The World Bank; Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel J (2005) The precautionary principle in practice. Environmental decision-making and scientific uncertainty. The Federation Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, Ricciardi A, MacIssac HJ (2005) Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biol Invas 14(6):1365–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MH, Newman MC, Hale RC (2002) Overview of ecological risk assessment in coastal and estuarine environments. In: Newman MC, Roberts MH, Hale RC (eds) Coastal and estua-rine risk assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • SPS Agreement (1994) Sanitary and phytosanitary measures. World Trade Organisation <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.htm>; accessed 28/01/2006

  • Standards Australia (2000) Environmental risk management, edn 3. Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (2004) Risk management guidelines: companion to AS/NZS4360:2004. Standards Australia; Homebush, NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas I, Elliott M (2005) Environmental impact theory and practice assessment in Australia, edn 4. The Federation Press, Marrickville

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman M (1998) Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:57–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, M.L. (2009). An Overview of Risk Assessment in a Marine Biosecurity Context. In: Rilov, G., Crooks, J.A. (eds) Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, vol 204. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79236-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics