Skip to main content

Contribution of Micromorphology to Classification of Aridic Soils

  • Chapter
New Trends in Soil Micromorphology

Abstract

The function of micromorphology is perceived as the interpretation of phenomena and aid in recognizing diagnostic horizons in the major soil classification systems of the world. The micromorphological contribution to the diagnostics of the horizons in soil classification comprises the complementary characteristics and/or confirmation of the genetic implications on a horizon, the clarification and identification of the horizon with its differentiating criteria. Hence, the application of micromorphology to soils of (sub) arid regions is promising in discriminating the pedogenic properties from the inherited ones, assessing the development and degradation of structure, the re-arrangement of soil solids by pedofauna and other agents, explaining the nature of clay-enriched subsoil, as well as the behavior of carbonates and gypsum. These functions are helpful in solving problems related to aridic soils, whose diagnostics comprises the identification of yermic, takyric, cambic, calcic, (paleo) argic horizons and features derived from accumulation of salts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen B (1985) Micromorphology of Aridisols. Soil Micromorphology and Soil Classification, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 15: 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurousseau P, Curmi P, Bresson LM (1985) Microscopy of the Cambic Horizon. Soil Micromorphology and Soil Classification, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 15: 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budina LP, Medvedev VP (1966) Brown semi-desert soils. In: Genesis and Classification of Semi-Desert Soils, Moscow, pp. 23–59 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock P, Fedoroff N, Jongerius A, Stoops G, Tursina, T Babel U (1985). Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research Publications, Albrighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (2001) Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Science Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovol’skiy GV, Rozov NN, Urusevskaya IS (1984).Fragment of the Map of Soil-geographic zoning of the USSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO/ISRIC/ISSS (1998) World reference base for soil resources. Rome: World Soil Resources Rep. 84. FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasimova M (2003) Higher levels of description – approaches to the micromorphological characterization of Russian soils. Catena, 54: 3, pp. 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazovskaya MA, Gorbunova IA (2002) Genetic analysis and classification of brown arid soils. Pochvovedenie, 11: 1287–1297 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubin SV (1984) Micromorphological diagnostics of brown and grey-brown soils of northern Ust’-Urt. In: Nature, Soils and Reclamation of the Ust’-Urt desert, Pushchino, pp. 127–134. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubin SV, Gulyaeva LA (1997) Dynamics of soil micromorphlogical fabric. In: Soil Micromorphology. Studies on Soil Diversity, Diagnostics, Dynamics, Wageningen, Moscow, pp. 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishchev VN, Lebedeva-Verba MP, Rogov VV, Stalina EE (2005) Cryogenesis of Recent and Late Pleistocene Sediments of Altay and Periglacial Regions of Europe. GEOS, Moscow [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedeva-Verba MP, Golovanov DL (2004) Micromorphological diagnostics of elementary pedogenetic processes for the purposes of desert soils classification. In: Soil Classification-(2004) Petrozavodsk, pp. 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobova EV (1960) Soils of the Desert Zone of the USSR, Moscow [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Minashina NG (1966) Micromorphology of loess, serozem and hei-loo-too and some problems of their paleogenesis. In: Micromorphological Method in Soil Genetic Research, Moscow, pp. 76–93 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Minashina NG (1973) Micromorphological fabric of desert takyric soils. In: Micromorphology of Soils and Sediments, Moscow, pp. 45–53 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Romashkevich AI, Gerasimova MI (1977) Major aspects of micromorphology of arid soils in the USSR. In: Aridic Soils, their Genesis, Geochemistry, Reclamation, Moscow, pp. 239–254 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shishov LL, Tonkonogov VD, Lebedeva II, Gerasimova MI (2004) Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of Russia, Smolensk p. 342 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoba S, Gerasimova M, Miedema R (1996) Soil Micromorphology: Studies on Soil Diversity Diagnostics Dynamics. Printing Service Centre Van Gils, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerasimova, M., Lebedeva, M. (2008). Contribution of Micromorphology to Classification of Aridic Soils. In: Kapur, S., Mermut, A., Stoops, G. (eds) New Trends in Soil Micromorphology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79134-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics