Advertisement

A Dynamic Coordination Mechanism Using Adjustable Autonomy

  • Bob van der Vecht
  • Frank Dignum
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
  • Martijn Neef
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4870)

Abstract

Agents in an organization need to coordinate their actions in order to reach the organizational goals. This research describes the relation between types of coordination and the autonomy of actors. In an experimental setting we show that there is not one best way to coordinate in all situations. The dynamics and complexity of, for example, crisis situations require a crisis management organization to work with dynamic types of coordination. In order to reach dynamic coordination we provide the actors with adjustable autonomy. Actors should be able to make decisions at different levels of autonomy and reason about the required level. We propose a way to implement this in a multi-agent system. The agent is provided with reasoning rules with which it can control the external influences on its decision-making.

Keywords

Multiagent System Reasoning Process Coordination Mechanism Reasoning Rule Coordination Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jennings, N.R.: On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence 117(2), 277–296 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. Utrecht University, PhD Thesis (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber, K.S., Martin, C.E.: Dynamic adaptive autonomy in multi-agent systems: Representation and justification. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 15(3), 405–433 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castelfranchi, C.: Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. Intelligent Agents (890), 56–70 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: The human in the loop of a delegated agent: the theory of adjustable social autonomy. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 31(5), 406–418 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verhagen, H.: Norm Autonomous Agents. Stockholm University, PhD Thesis (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schurr, N., Marecki, J., Lewis, J., Tambe, M., Scerri, P.: The defacto system: Training tool for incident commanders. In: AAAI, pp. 1555–1562 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tambe, M., Scerri, P., Pynadath, D.: Adjustable autonomy for the realworld. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (17), 171–228 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, C.E., Barber, K.S.: Adaptive decision-making frameworks for dynamic multi-agent organizational change. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13(3), 391–428 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dastani, M., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.C.: Autonomy and agent deliberation. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiß, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco, pp. 312–319 (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, B., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.: A programming language for cognitive agents: Goal directed 3apl. In: Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) PROMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3067, pp. 111–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hindriks, K.V., de Boer, F.S., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.J.C.: Agent programming in 3apl. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(4), 357–401 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oomes, A.H.J.: Organization awareness in crisis management. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information Systems on Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM) (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bob van der Vecht
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frank Dignum
    • 2
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
    • 2
  • Martijn Neef
    • 1
  1. 1.TNO DefenceSafety and SecurityThe Hague
  2. 2.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUniversiteit UtrechtUtrecht

Personalised recommendations