Advertisement

A Normative Multi-Agent Systems Approach to the Use of Conviviality for Digital Cities

  • Patrice Caire
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4870)

Abstract

Conviviality is a mechanism to reinforce social cohesion and a tool to reduce mis-coordination between individuals, groups and institutions in web communities, for example in digital cities. We use a two-fold definition of conviviality as a condition for social interactions and an instrument for the internal regulation of social systems. In this paper we discuss the use of normative multi-agent systems to analyze the use of conviviality for digital cities, by contrasting norms for conviviality with legal and institutional norms in digital cities. We show the role of the distinction among various kinds of norms, the explicit representation of norms, the violability of norms and the dynamics of norms in the context of conviviality for digital cities.

Keywords

Conviviality multi-agent systems normative systems social computing digital cities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Caire, P.: Designing convivial digital cities. In Nijholt, A., O.S., Nishida, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Social Intelligence Design (SID 2007), pp. 25–40 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lau, G.T., Law, K.H., Wiederhold, G.: Analyzing government regulations using structural and domain information. IEEE Computer 38(12), 70–76 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weyrich, C.: Orientations for workprogramme 2000 and beyond. Information society technologies report, Information Society Technologies Advisory Group (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caire, P.: A critical discussion on the use of the notion of conviviality for digital cities. In: Proceedings of Web Communities 2007, pp. 193–200 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van den Besselaar, P., Melis, I., Beckers, D.: Digital cities: Organization, content, and use. [7], pp. 18–32Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishida, T.: Understanding digital cities. [7], pp. 7–17Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishida, T., Isbister, K. (eds.): Digital Cities 1999. LNCS, vol. 1765. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanabe, M., van den Besselaar, P., Ishida, T. (eds.): Digital Cities 2001. LNCS, vol. 2362. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van den Besselaar, P., Koizumi, S. (eds.): Digital Cities 2003. LNCS, vol. 3081. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12, 71–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Regulative and constitutive norms in normative multiagent systems. In: Knowledge Representation, pp. 255–266 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lawrence, D.G.: Procedural norms and tolerance: A reassessment. The American Political Science Review (1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Constitutive norms in the design of normative multiagent systems. In: CLIMA VI, pp. 303–319 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caire, P.: Conviviality for digital cities: A normative multi-agent systems approach. In: Dastani, M., de Jong, E. (eds.) Proceedings of The 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2007), pp. 73–80 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones, A., Carmo, J.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. In: Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties, pp. 265–344. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dictionnaire de l’academie francaise. Neuvieme Edition, Version Informatisee (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oxford english dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Le grand dictionnaire terminologique. Office Quebecois de la Langue Francaise (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago (1974)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Illich, I.: Deschooling Society. Marion Boyars Publishers, Ltd. (1971)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papert, S., Harel, I.: 1. In: Constructionism, MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schechter, M.: Conviviality, gender and love stories: Plato’s symposium and isak dinesen’s (k. Blixen’s) babette’s feast. Trans, Internet journal for cultural sciences 1(15) (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Illich, I.: Tools for Conviviality. Marion Boyars Publishers (1974)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Putnam, R.D.: Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, p. 357 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Putnam, R.D.: Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3), 427–460 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamizet, B.: Culture – commonness of the common? Trans, Internet journal for cultural sciences 1(15) (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caire, P.: Conviviality for ambient intelligence. In: Olivier, P., Kray, C. (eds.) Proceedings of Artificial Societies for Ambient Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB 2007), pp. 14–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Caire, P.: A normative multi-agent systems approach to the use of conviviality for digital cities. In: Noriega, P., Padget, J. (eds.) Proceedings of The International Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN), pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ashby, W.: Unmasking narrative: A semiotic perspective on the conviviality/non-conviviality dichotomy in storytelling about the german other. Trans, Internet journal for cultural sciences 1(15) (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taylor, M.: Oh no it isn’t: Audience participation and community identity. Trans, Internet journal for cultural sciences 1(15) (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wooldridge, M.: An introduction to multi-agent systems. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(3), 16–23 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pelachaud, C.: Multimodal expressive embodied conversational agents. In: ACM Multimedia, pp. 683–689 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cassell, J.: Embodied conversational interface agents. Commun. ACM 43(4), 70–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sadek, M.D., Bretier, P., Panaget, E.: ARTIMIS: Natural dialogue meets rational agency. In: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 1030–1035 (1997)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ochs, M., Niewiadomski, R., Pelachaud, C., Sadek, D.: Intelligent expressions of emotions. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 707–714 (2005) Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gomes, E.R., Boff, E., Vicari, R.M.: Social, affective and pedagogical agents for the recommendation of student tutors. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., op den Akker, R., Vissers, M.: Intelligent expressions of emotions. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 707–714 (2005) Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artif. Intell. Rev. 24(1), 33–60 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Normative multiagent systems and trust dynamics. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3577, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Casare, S., Sichman, J.: Towards a functional ontology of reputation. In: AAMAS 2005: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 505–511. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Erickson, T., Kellogg, W.A.: Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(1), 59–83 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    ter Hofte, G.H., Mulder, I., Verwijs, C.: Close encounters of the virtual kind: A study on place-based presence. AI Soc. 20(2), 151–168 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hechter, M., Opp, K.D.: Social Norms. Russell Sage Foundation, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press (1995)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ros, R., Veloso, M.M., de Mántaras, R.L., Sierra, C., Arcos, J.L.: Beyond individualism: Modeling team playing behavior in robot soccer through case-based reasoning. In: AAAI, pp. 1671–1674. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Castelfranchi, C.: The micro-macro constitution of power. Protosociology 18, 208–269 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    de Pinninck, A.P., Sierra, C., Schorlemmer, M.: Distributed Norm Enforcement Via Ostracism. In: Sichman, J.S., Padget, J., Ossowski, S., Noriega, P. (eds.) COIN 2007. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 4870, pp. 301–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrice Caire
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of LuxembourgRue Richard Coudenhove-KalergiLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations