Abstract
An efficient forest∈dexforest management requires accurate and cost-effective measurements of forest inventory parameters. The cost of LiDAR surveys are directly dependent on the number and size of validation plots as well as the sampling density of points needed to adequately estimate forest inventory parameters. This study investigates (i) the spatial variability of the forest stand, i.e., the effect of the area chosen on the prediction of forest parameters and (ii) the relation between prediction accuracy and sampling point density for the estimation of top height, basal area and volume at plot level. Assessment of the stand’s spatial variability was accomplished by comparing the accuracy of the top height estimations, using the 99th percentile of a normalised distribution of points, over areas of different size. Original sampling density was synthetically reduced to 10, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0.50, 0.33, 0.25 and 0.20 returns per m2. Forest parameters were subsequently estimated for each point density by means of 99th percentile (top height) and linear regression models (basal area and volume). Predictions were validated using 11 stands, each containing one 50x50 m2 plot. Results show that the optimum area for forest parameters prediction is 1600 m2 with an average top height accuracy of 95.05% and a standard deviation of 3.41%. Larger sizes will merely increase the cost of field data collection without improving accuracy. Interestingly, top height predictions were slightly more accurate for lower point densities. Linear equations yielded RMSEs of 3.28-5.28 m2/ha and 29.41-36.04 m3/ha for basal area and volume respectively. There were therefore small differences in terms of accuracy of predicted parameters for different point densities, which indicates that once a good DTM is created, future LiDAR surveys can be accomplished over the same area at lower sampling densities, and thus reducing the costs but without disregarding estimation accuracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Behera MD, Roy PS (2002) Lidar remote sensing for forestry applications: The Indian Context. Current Science 83: 1320-1328.
Bortolot ZJ, Wynne RH (2005) Estimating forest biomass using small footprint LiDAR data: An individual tree-based approach that incorporates training data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 59: 342-360.
Evans DL, Roberts D, McCombs JW, Harrintong RL (2001) Detection of Regularly Spaced Targets in Small-Footprint LIDAR Data: Research Issues for Consideration. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67: 1113-1136.
Forestry Commission (2006a) Annual Report and Accounts 2005-2006.
Forestry Commission (2006b) Forestry Facts & Figures 2006.
García O (1998) Estimating top height with variable plot sizes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 1509-1517.
García O (2006) Scale and spatial structure effects on tree size distributions: impllications for growth and yield modelling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 2983-2993.
Goodwin NR, Coops NC, Culvenor DS (2006) Assessment of forest structure with airborne LiDAR and the effects of platform altitude. Remote Sensing of Environment 103: 140-152.
Holmgren J (2004) Prediction of Tree Height, Basal Area and Stem Volume in Forest Stands Using Airborne Laser Scanning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, vol 19, pp 543-553.
Holmgren J, Nilsson I, Olsson H (2003a) Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29: 623-632.
Holmgren J, Nilsson I, Olsson H (2003b) Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning. Forest Science 49: 419-428.
Hyyppa J, Inkinen M (1999) Detecting and estimating attributes for single trees using laser scanner. Photogrammetric Journal of Finland 16: 27-42.
Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ (2002) Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies. BioScience 52: 19-30.
Lim K, Treitz P, Wulder M, St-Onge B, Flood M (2003) LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography 27: 88-106.
Lovell JL, Jupp DLB, Culvenor DS, Coops NC (2003) Using airborne and ground-based ranging lidar to measure canopy structure in Australian forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29: 607-622.
Lovel JL, Jupp DLB, Newnham GJ, Coops NC, Culvenor DS (2005) Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest hight retrieval. Forest Ecology and Management 214: 398-412.
Magnussen S (1999) Effect of Plot Size on Estimates of Top Height in Douglas-Fir. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14: 17-27.
Magnussen S, Boudewyn P (1998) Derevations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 1016-1031.
Maltamo M, Eerikainen K, Packalén P, Hyyppa J (2006) Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics. Forestry 79: 217-229.
Means JE, Acker SA, Brandon JF, Renslow M, Emerson L, Hendrix CJ (2000) Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66: 1367-1371.
Naesset E (2002) Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of environment 80: 88-99.
Naesset E. (2004a) Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy heitht and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Remote Sensing of Environment 91: 243-255.
Naesset E (2004b) Practical Large-scale Forest Stand Inventory Using a Small-footprint Airborne Scanning Laser. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19: 164-179.
Nelson R (1997) Model Forest Canopy Heights: The Effects of Canopy Shape. Remote Sensing of Environment 60: 327-334.
Philip MS (1998) Measuring Trees and Forests, Oxon, CABI Publishing.
Spurr SH (1952) Forest inventory, New York, Ronald Press.
Suárez JC, Ontiveiros C, Smith S, Snape S (2004) The Use of Airborne LiDAR and Aerial Photography in the Estimation of Individual Tree Heights in Forestry. AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science. Heraklion, Greece.
Suárez JC, Snape S, Ontiveiros C, Smith S (2005) Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry. Computers and Geosciences 31: 253-262.
Yu X., Hyyppa J, Hyyppa H, Maltamo M (2004) Effects of flight altitude on tree height estimation using airborne laser scanning. In laser scanners for forest∈dexforest and landscape assessment. IN THIES, M., KOCH, B., SPIECKER, H. & WEINACKER, H. (Eds.) Proceedings of the ISPRS working group VIII/2. Freiburg, Germany, October, 3 – 6, 2004. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 36 (8/W2), pp 96 – 101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doce, D.D., Suárez, J.C., Patenaude, G. (2008). Assessing Stand and Data Variability Using Airborne Laser Scanner. In: Bernard, L., Friis-Christensen, A., Pundt, H. (eds) The European Information Society. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78946-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78946-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78945-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78946-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)