Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Revision Sinus Surgery pp 199–215Cite as

Staging of Disease after Sinus Surgery Failure

  • Chapter

  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

• Despite many suggested methods of staging for chronic rhinosinusitis, there are intrinsic difficulties in finding the “perfect” solution.

• Most staging systems have relied on computed tomography (CT) scoring, endoscopic findings, symptom scores or combinations thereof and have concentrated on patients undergoing primary surgery rather than patients with recurrent symptoms awaiting revision surgery.

• Whilst a correlation can be shown between CT and endoscopic findings, the correlation between CT changes and symptoms is generally poor in either circumstance.

• The purpose of staging in inflammation/infection in contrast to malignancy may relate more to demonstration of the disease and as an inclusion criterion for clinical research than as a predictive tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annamalai S, Kumar NA, Madkour MB, et al. (2003) An association between acquired epiphora and the signs and symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis: A prospective case-control study. Am J Rhinol 17:111–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashraf N, Bhattacharyya N (2001) Determination of the “incidental” Lund score for the staging of chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:483–486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atlas SJ, Gallagher PM, Wu YA et al. (2005) Development and validation of a new health-related quality of life instrument for patients with sinusitis. Qual Life Res 14:1375–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benninger MS, Senior BA (1997) The development of the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:1175–1179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharrya N (1999) Computed tomographic staging and the fate of the dependent sinuses in revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125: 994–999

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharyya N (2004) Clinical outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:975–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhattacharyya N (2005) A comparison of symptom scores and radiographic staging systems in chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 19:175–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharyya N (2006) Radiographic stage fails to predict symptom outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 116:18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley DT, Kountakis SE (2005) Correlation between computed tomograph scores and symptomatic improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 115:466–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Browne JP, Hopkins C, Slack R, et al. (2006) Health-related quality of life after polypectomy with and without additional surgery. Laryngoscope 116:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Caldwell GW (1893) Diseases of the accessory sinuses of the nose and an improved method of treatment of suppuration of the maxillary sinus. N Y Med J 58:526–528

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cannady SB, Baztra PS, Sautter NB, et al. (2007) New staging system for sinonasal inverted papilloma in the endoscopic era. Laryngoscope 117:1283–1287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cantu G, Solero CL, Miceli R, et al. (2005) Which classification for ethmoid malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base? Head Neck 27:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandler JR, Goulding R, Moskowitz L (1984) Nasopharyngeal angiofibromas: staging and managements. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93:322–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clement PA, Bijloos J, Kaufman L, et al. (1989) Incidence and etiology of rhinosinusitis in children. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 43:523–543

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fokkens W, Lund VJ, Bachert C et al. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (2005) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl 18:1–87

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fisch U (1983) The infratemporal fossa approach for nasopharyngeal tumours. Laryngoscope 93:36–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fokkens W, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. (2007) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007. Rhinology Suppl 20:1–136

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman WH, Katsantonis GP, Bumpous JM (1995) Staging of chronic hyperplastic rhinosinusitis: treatment strategies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaskins RE (1992) A surgical staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 6:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giger R, Dulguerov P, Quinodoz D, et al. (2004) Chronic panrhinosinusitis without nasal polyps: long-term outcome after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:534–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gliklich R, Metson R (1994) A comparison of sinus computed tomography (CT) staging systems for outcomes research. Am J Rhinol 8:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greene FL, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Shah JP, Winchester DP (eds) (2006) American Joint Committee on Cancer: Cancer Staging Atlas. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guerrero J, Molina B, Echeverría L, et al. (2007) Endoscopic sinonasal surgery: study of 110 patients with nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaringol Esp 58:252–256

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hill M, Bhattacharyya N, Hall TR, et al. (2004) Incidental paranasal sinus imaging abnormalities and the normal Lund score in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:171–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holbrook EH, Brown CL, Lyden ER, et al. (2005) Lack of significant correlation between rhinosinusitis symptoms and specific regions of sinus computer tomography scans. Am J Rhinol 19:382–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, et al. (2006) The national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 31:390–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, et al. (2006) Complications of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis: the results of a national audit in England and Wales. Laryngoscope 116:1494–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Howard DJ, Lloyd G, Lund VJ (2001) Recurrence and its avoidance in juvenile angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 111:1509–1511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johansson L, Akerlund A, Holmberg K, et al. (2000) Evaluation of methods for endoscopic staging of nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol 120:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jorgensen RA (1991) Endoscopic and computed tomographic findings in ostiomeatal sinus disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:279–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kadish S, Goodman M, Wang C (1976) Olfactory neuroblastoma: a clinical analysis of 17 cases. Cancer 37:1571–1576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kay DJ, Rosenfeld RM (2003) Quality of life for children with persistent sinonasal symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:17–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennedy DW (1992) Prognostic factors, outcomes and staging in ethmoid sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 57: 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kountakis SE, Arango P, Bradley D, et al. (2004) Molecular and cellular staging for the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 114:1895–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lehman DA, Casiano RR, Polak M (2006) Reliability of the University of Miami chronic rhinosinusitis staging system. Am J Rhinol 20:11–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Levine H, May E (eds) (1993) Rhinology and Sinusology. Thieme, New York, p 261

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lildholdt T, Rundcrantz H, Lindqvist N (1995) Efficacy of topical corticosteroid powder for nasal polyps: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of budesonide. Clin Otolaryngol 20:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lim M, Lew-Gor, S. Darby Y, et al. (2007) The relationship between subjective assessment instruments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 45:144–147

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lloyd GA (1990) CT of the paranasal sinuses: study of a control series in relation to endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 104:477–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lund VJ, Kennedy DW (1997) Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S35–S40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lund VJ, MacKay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31:183–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. McMains KC, Kountakis SE (2005) Revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery: objective and subjective surgical outcomes. Am J Rhinol 19:344–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McNeill E, O’Hara J, Carrie S (2006) The significance of MRI findings for non-rhinological disease. Clin Otolaryngol 31:292–296; discussion 296

    Google Scholar 

  45. Meltzer EO, Hamilos D, Hadley JA, et al. (2004) Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:S1–S62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA, et al. (2006) Rhinosinusitis: developing guidance for clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:S31–S80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Morley AD, Sharp HR (2006) A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems – Which is best? Clin Otolaryngol 31:103–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Newman LJ, Platts-Mills TAE, Phillips DC, et al. (1994) Chronic sinusitis relationship of computed tomographic findings to allergy, asthma and eosinophilia. JAMA 271:363–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Oikawa K, Furuta Y, Oridate N (2003) Pre-operative staging of sinonasal inverted papilloma by magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 113:1983–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Oluwole M, Russell N, Tan L, et al. (1996) A comparison of computerized tomographic staging systems in chronic sinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 21:91–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML (2002) Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Weaver A, et al. (2005) Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with intranasal amphotericin B: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded pilot trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115:125–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Report of the Rhinosinusitis Task Force Committee Meeting (1997) Alexandria, Virginia, August 17, 1996. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:S1–S68

    Google Scholar 

  54. Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Brennan-Diemer F, et al. (1998) Development and preliminary validation of the multiattribute Rhinitis Symptom Utility Index. Qual Life Res 7:693–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Savy L, Lloyd G, Lund VJ, Howard DH (2000) Optimum imaging and diagnosis for inverted papilloma. J Laryngol Otol 114:891–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Smith TL, Batra PS, Seiden AM, Hanley M (2005) Evidence supporting endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review. Am J Rhinol 19:537–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith TL, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Loehrl TA, et al. (2005) Predictive factors and outcomes in endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 115:2199–2205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stamm AC (2000) Surgical grading system for inverted papillomas. In: Stamm AC, Draf W (eds) Micro-endoscopic Surgery of the Paranasal Sinuses and the Skull Base. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 147–152

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stewart MG, Sicard MW, Piccirillo J, et al. (1999) Severity staging in chronic sinusitis: are CT scans findings related to patient symptoms. Am J Rhinol 13:161–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Toros SZ, Bölükbasi S, Naiboğlu B, et al. (2004) Comparative outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Laryngoscope 114:1895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wabnitz DAM, Nair S, Wormald PJ (2005) Correlation between preoperative symptom scores, quality-of-life questionnaires, and staging with computed tomography in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 19:91–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Walker FD, White PS (2000) Sinus symptom scores: what is the range in healthy individuals. Clin Otolaryngol 25:482–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Laryngology and Otology, University College London, Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Grays Inn Road, WC1X 8DA, London, UK

    Valerie J. Lund

Authors
  1. Valerie J. Lund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lund, V. (2008). Staging of Disease after Sinus Surgery Failure. In: Revision Sinus Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78931-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78931-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78930-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78931-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation