Advertisement

Sharing Orphan Genes

Governing a European-Biobank-Network for the Rare Disease Community
  • Georg Lauss
Conference paper
Part of the Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim book series (IMGB, volume 33)

Abstract

The majority of current discussions concerning governance challenges in biobanking conceptualize biobanks as technical tools that have to be embedded in a social environment without infringing donors’ personal integrity and privacy. This article reconstructs the course of events that induced a European biobanknetwork operating in the area of rare-disease research: EuroBioBank. Its main focus is on the analysis of social and political complexity involved in the creation of a putatively value-neutral research facility. This case study discusses the governance regime that was adopted to facilitate the intra-European exchange of high quality biological material and its peculiarity in institutionalizing the involvement of organized patient interests. In this model, the participation of organizations of civil society was not regarded as an obstacle, but on the contrary as a valuable resource for effective and democratic governance.

Keywords

Rare Disease Muscular Dystrophy Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Dystrophin Gene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barataud B (1992) Au nom des nos enfants. ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry A (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. The Athlone Press, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Callon M (2005) Disabled Persons of all Countries, Unite! Making Things Public-Atmospheres of Democracy. In: Latour B and Weibel P, pp 308-313. ZKM/MIT Press, Karlsruhe, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Desrosières A (2005) Die Politik der großen Zahlen. Eine Geschichte der statistischen Denkweise. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Decision No.1295/1999/EC (1999). Adopting a programme of Community action on rare diseases within the framwork for action in the field of public health.Google Scholar
  6. Goyenvalle A, Vulin A, Fougerousse F et al (2004) Rescue of Dystrophic Muscle Through U7 snRNA-Mediated Exon Skipping. Science 306(5702): 1796-1799Google Scholar
  7. Keller EF (2000) The century of the gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  8. Luhmann N (2002) Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt aMGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayntz R (1993) Policy Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 34: 39-56.Google Scholar
  10. Merkel A (1927) Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. Verlag von Julius Springer, Wien/BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Rabeharisoa V, Callon M (2006) Patients and scientists in French muscular dystrophy research. States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. In: S. Jasanoff pp142-160. Routledge, New York 142-160.Google Scholar
  12. Rabinow P (1999) French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Rabinow P (2004) Anthroplogie der Vernunft: Studien zu Wissenschaft und Lebensführung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt aMGoogle Scholar
  14. Stark K, Eder J, Zatloukal K (2007) Achieving k-anonymity in DataMarts used for gene expressions exploitation. J Integr Bioinformatics 4(1): 483-495Google Scholar
  15. Stone D (2001) The policy paradox: The art of political decision making. W.W.Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Uranga AM, Arribas CM, d. Donato JH et al (2005) Outstanding legal and ethical issues on biobanks: An overview on the regulations of member states of the EuroBioBank project. Instituto de Salud Carlos II, MadridGoogle Scholar
  17. Weber M (1976) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  18. Weiss R (1994) Learning from Strangers. The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Lauss
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations