Skip to main content

Radiology in Suspected Child Abuse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forensic Aspects of Pediatric Fractures

Abstract

Even before Kempe published his now classic article on ‘the battered child syndrome’ in 1962 [1], radiologists drew attention to fractures that could really only be explained by the impact of external mechanical force. In 1946, Caffey was the first to describe the relation between the presence of multiple fractures of the long bones and subdural haematomas in six children in whom no previous trauma was known [2]. He thought it remarkable that in a number of children no new anomalies were found while hospitalised; however, some children showed new manifestations as soon as they returned home. Based on the fact that in children subdural haematomas are usually of traumatic origin, he suspected that this combination had a traumatic origin. In 1953, Silberman established that the combination of injuries as described by Caffey had to have a traumatic background [3]. In 1955, Woolley was the first to conclude that the found anomalies were the result of ‘intentionally’ inflicted physical injuries [4]. In 1957, 11 years after his original publication, Caffey concluded that abuse by either one or both parent(s) could be a possible explanation for this combination of injuries [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kempe CH, Silverman FN, Steele BF et al The battered child syndrome. JAMA 1962;181:17-24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caffey J. Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1946;56:163-73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silverman FM. The Roentgen manifestations of unrecognized skeletal trauma in infants. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1953;69(3):413-26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woolley PV, Evans WA. Significance of skeletal lesions in infants resembling those of traumatic origin. J Am Med Assoc 1955;158(7):539-43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caffey J. Some traumatic lesions in growing bones other than fractures and dislocations: clinical and radiological features. Brit J Radiol 1957;30(353):225-38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellerstein NS, Norris KJ. Value of radiologic skeletal survey in assessment of abused children. Pediatr 1984;74(6): 1075-8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Suspected Physical Abuse - Child. ACR, 2005 http://www.acr.org/

  8. Intercollegiate report from the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Standards for radiological investigations of suspected non-accidental injury. RCR and RCPCH, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ingram JD, Connell J, Hay TC. Oblique radiographs of the chest in nonaccidental trauma. Emerg Radiol 2000;7(1): 42-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen KK, Prince JS, Nixon GW. Oblique chest views as a routine part of skeletal surveys performed for possible physical abuse--is this practice worthwhile? Child Abuse Negl 2008;32(1):155-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitt BD. The child with nonaccidental trauma. In Helfer RE, Kempe RS (eds). The battered child. University of Chicago Press 4th edition 1987, 178-96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell KA, Bogen DL, Berger RP. The other children: a survey of child abuse physicians on the medical evaluation of children living with a physically abused child. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160(12):1241-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton-Giachritsis CE, Browne KD. A retrospective study of risk to siblings in abusing families. J Fam Psychol 2005; 19(4):619-24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.bspr.org.uk/nai.htm

  15. Alexander R, Kleinman PK. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse - portable guides to investigating child abuse. US Department of Justice, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  16. Offiah AC, Hall CM. Observational study of skeletal surveys in suspected non-accidental injury. Clin Radiol 2003;58 (9):702-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kleinman PL, Kleinman PK, Savageau JA. Suspected infant abuse: radiographic skeletal survey practices in pediatric health care facilities. Radiology 2004;233(2):477-85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Rijn RR, Kieviet N, Hoekstra R et al Radiology in suspected Non Accidental Injury: theory and practice in the Netherlands. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:147-151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swinson S, Tapp M, Brindley R et al An audit of skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental injury following publication of the British Society of Paediatric Radiology guidelines. Clin Radiol 2008;63(6):651-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinman PK, Nimkin K, Spevak MR et al Follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child abuse. Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(4):893-6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prosser I, Maguire S, Harrison SK et al How old is this fracture? Radiologic dating of fractures in children: a systematic review. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(4):1282-6

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman S, Makoroff K, Care M et al Utility of follow-up skeletal surveys in suspected child physical abuse evaluations. Child Abuse Negl 2005;29(10):1075-83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kemp AM, Butler A, Morris S et al Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? Clin Radiol 2006;61(9):723-36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scaglione M, Pinto A, Pedrosa I et al Multi-detector row computed tomography and blunt chest trauma. Eur J Radiol 2008;65(3):377-88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sangster GP, González-Beicos A, Carbo AI et al Blunt traumatic injuries of the lung parenchyma, pleura, thoracic wall, and intrathoracic airways: multidetector computer tomography imaging findings. Emerg Radiol 2007;14(5):297-310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Provenzale J CT and MR imaging of acute cranial trauma. Emerg Radiol 2007;14(1):1-12

    Google Scholar 

  27. Geijer M, El-Khoury GY. MDCT in the evaluation of skeletal trauma: principles, protocols, and clinical applications. Emerg Radiol 2006;13(1):7-18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stoodley N. Neuroimaging in child abuse: reducing the risk. Clin Radiol 2004;59(11):965-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hargaden G, O’Connell M, Kavanagh E et al Current concepts in wholebody imaging using turbo short tau inversion recovery MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(1):247-52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Miller SF et al Fast STIR whole-body MR imaging in children. Radiographics 2004; 24(5):1317-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar J, Seith A, Kumar A et al Whole body MR imaging with the use of parallel imaging for the detection of skeletal metastases in pediatric patients with small-cell neoplasms: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET/CT. Ped Radiol 2008;38(9):953-62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stranzinger E, Kellenberger CJ, Braunschweig S et al Whole-body STIR MR imaging in suspected child abuse: an alternative to skeletal survey radiography? Eur J Radiol Extra 2007;63(1):43-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elterman T, Beer M, Girschick HJ. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in child abuse. J Child Neurol 2007;22(2):170-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Evangelista P, Barron C, Goldberg A et al MRI STIR for the evaluation of nonaccidental trauma in children. Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting April 29-May 2, 2006, San Francisco, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cohen MC, Whitby E. The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital an coronial pediatric postmortem examination. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2007;3(4):289-96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dedouit F, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Capuani C et al Child Abuse: practical application of autopsy, radiological, and microscopic studies. J Forensic Sci 2008;53(6):1424-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Norman MG, Smialek JE, Newman DE et al The postmortem examination of the abused child. Pathological, radiographic and legal aspects. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1984;8 (4):313-43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kleinman PK, Marks SC, Richmond JM et al Inflicted skeletal injury, a postmortem radiologic-histopathologic study in 31 infants. Am J Radiol 1995;165(3):647-50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Harris VJ, Lorand MA, Fitzpatrick JJ et al Radiographic atlas of child abuse - a case studies approach. Igaku-Shoin 1996, 9-10

    Google Scholar 

  40. McGraw EP, Pless JE, Pennington DJ et al Postmortem radiography after unexpected death in neonates, infants, and children: should imaging be routine? Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(6):1517-21

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sperry K, Pfalzgraf R. Inadvertent clavicular fractures caused by ‘chiropractic’ manipulations in an infant: an unusual form of pseudoabuse. J Forensic Sci 1995;35(5): 1211-6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ojima K, Matsumoto H, Hayase T et al An autopsy case of osteogenesis imperfecta initially suspected as child abuse. Forensic Sci Int 1994;65(2):97-104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bollinger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S et al Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 2008;18(2): 273-82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stawicki SP, Gracias VH, Schrag SP et al The dead continue to teach the living: Examining the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the setting of postmortem examinations. J Surg Educ 2008;65(3): 200-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Griffiths PD, Paley MNJ, Whitby EH. Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 2005;365 (9466):1271-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grabherr S, Gygax E, Sollberger B et al Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(2):345-51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N et al Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) demonstration of the relation between gastrointestinal (GI) distention and hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG). Radiat Med 2004;22(1):25-9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. American Academy of Pediatrics. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics 2000;105(6):1345-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Merten DF, Cooperman DR, Thompson GH. Skeletal manifestations of child abuse. In Reece RM (ed). Child abuse - medical diagnosis and management. Lea & Febiger 1992, 23-53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob A. C. Bilo MD .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bilo, R.A.C., Robben, S.G.F., van Rijn, R.R. (2010). Radiology in Suspected Child Abuse. In: Forensic Aspects of Pediatric Fractures. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78716-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78716-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78715-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78716-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics