This chapter surveys the literature on the role of the rate of time preference in macroeconomics. The tradition of Bohm-Bawerk (The positive theory of capital, MacMillan, London, 1891) and Fisher (The theory of interest, MacMillan, New York, NY, 1930) to contemplate on nature and causes of time discount was distilled by Samuelson (1937) in his elegant formulation of the discounted utility (DU) model, which almost dominated the profession for a long time. As noted by Koop-mans (Econometrica 28:287–309, 1960) and Ramsey (Econ J 38:543–559, 1928), time consistency is a key postulate required for the DU formulation. Following Stroz (Rev Econ Stud 23:165–180,1955), Phelps and Pollak (Rev Econ Stud 35:185–199, 1968) and Laibson (Q J Econ 112:443–477,1997) explored a game-theoretic situation where the present self has a conflict with the future selves. Laibson's hyperbolic discounting, motivated by the psychological and experimental findings that people tend to discount the immediate future more than the distant one, opens up a wide perspective in macroeconomics. Also, large accumulation of international debts can be attributed to the difference in time discount rates among nations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barro RJ (1999) Ramsey meets Laibson in the neoclassical growth model. Q J Econ 114:1125– 1152
Becker GS, Mulligan CB (1997) The endogenous determination of time preference. Q J Econ 112:729–758
Bernheim D, Skinner J, Weinberg S (2001) What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among households? Am Econ Rev 91:832–857
Berns GS, Laibson D, Loewenstein G (2007) Intertemporal choice — toward an integrative framework. Trends Cogn Sci 11:482–488
Böhm-Bawerk EV (1891) The positive theory of capital. Smart WA (transl.). MacMillan, London
Buiter WH (1981) Time preference and international lending and borrowing in an overlapping-generations model. J Polit Econ 89:769–797
Carroll CD (1992) The buffer-stock theory of saving: some macroeconomic evidence. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:61–156
Cass D (1965) Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Rev Econ Stud 32:233–240
Cheng X, Hamada K, Kamihigashi T (2008) Toward a microfoundation of the theory of capital movements (in progress)
Deaton A, Paxson C (1994) Intertemporal choice and inequality. J Polit Econ 102:437–467
Endoh M, Hamada K, Shimomura K (2008) Can a preferential trade agreement benefit the neighbors without compensating them? Econ Growth Cent Discuss Pap 961
Fisher I (1930) The theory of interest. MacMillan, New York, NY
Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40:351–401
Friedman M (1957) A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hamada K (1966) Economic growth and long-term international capital movements. Yale Econ Essays 6:49–96
Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28:287–309
Koopmans TC (1965) On the concept of optimal economic growth. In: The econometric approach to development planning. Pontif. Acad. Sc. Scripta Varia 28:225–300
Krusell P, Kuruscu B, Smith AA Jr (2002) Equilibrium welfare and government policy with quasi-geometric discounting. J Econ Theory 105:42–72
Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112:443–477
Lawrance EC (1991) Poverty and the rate of time preference: evidence from panel data. J Polit Econ 99:54–77
Lucas RE, Stokey NL (1984) Optimal growth with many consumers. J Econ Theory 32:139–171
Mulligan CB (1996) A logical economist's argument against hyperbolic discounting. Mimeo
Obstfeld M, Rogoff K (1995) Exchange rate dynamics redux. J Polit Econ 103:624–660
Ogaki M, Atkeson A (1997) Rate of time preference, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, and level of wealth. Rev Econ Stat 79:564–572
Phelps ES (1961) The golden rule of accumulation. Am Econ Rev 51:638–642
Phelps ES, Pollak R (1968) On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev Econ Stud 35:185–199
Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. MacMillan, London
Rae J (1834) The sociology theory of capital, reprinted edn. MacMillan, London
Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38:543–559
Rubinstein A (2001) A theorist's view of experiments. Eur Econ Rev 45:615–628
Samuelson P (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev Econ Stud 4:155–161
Sorger G (2007) Strategic saving decisions in the infinite-horizon model. Econ Theory 36:353–377
Stroz RH (1955) Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev Econ Stud 23:165–180
Uzawa H (1968) Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. In: Wolfe JN (ed) Value, capital, and growth: papers in honour of Sir John Hicks. The University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamada, K., Takeda, Y. (2009). On the Role of the Rate of Time Preference in Macroeconomics: A Survey. In: Kamihigashi, T., Zhao, L. (eds) International Trade and Economic Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78676-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78676-4_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78675-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78676-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)