Skip to main content

On Drawing Conclusions in Presence of Inconsistent Data

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4953))

  • 1570 Accesses

Abstract

Most automated tests assessing students understanding of a concept contain one question requiring application of that concept. To attain a higher level of certainty in the evaluation process we propose a test with three different questions requiring application of one concept. Such a test is intended to facilitate the self-assessment process and can be suggested to students after a concept has been introduced. Lattice theory and higher-order logic are further applied for presenting a structure that can serve as a building block of an intelligent tutoring system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap, N.J.: A useful four.valued logic. In: Dunn, J.M., Epstain, G. (eds.) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, pp. 8–37. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferreira, U.: A Five-valued Logic and a System. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 4(3), 134–140 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodstein, R.L.: Boolean Algebra. Dover Publications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gradel, E., Otto, M., Rosen, E.: Undecidability results on two-variable logics. Archive of Mathematical Logic 38, 313–354 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Guzmàn, E., Conejo, R.: A model for student knowledge diagnosis through adaptive testing. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 12–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huffman, D., Goldberg, F., Michlin, M.: Using computers to create constructivist environments: impact on pedagogy and achievement. Journal of Computers in mathematics and science teaching 22(2), 151–168 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Immerman, N., Rabinovich, A., Reps, T., Sagiv, M., Yorsh, G.: The boundery between decidability and undecidability of transitive closure logics. In: Marcinkowski, J., Tarlecki, A. (eds.) CSL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3210, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kleene, S.: Introduction to Metamathematics. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/perception/v4_mrq.html

  11. Park, C., Kim, M.: Development of a Level-Based Instruction Model in Web-Based Education. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3190, pp. 215–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos, C.T., Osòrio, F.S.: Integrating intelligent agents, user models, and automatic content categorization in virtual environment. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 128–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Whitesitt, J.E.: Boolean Algebra and Its Applications. Dover Publications (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Computers Math. Applic. 23(6-9), 493–515 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ngoc Thanh Nguyen Geun Sik Jo Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Encheva, S., Tumin, S. (2008). On Drawing Conclusions in Presence of Inconsistent Data. In: Nguyen, N.T., Jo, G.S., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4953. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78582-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78582-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78581-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78582-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics