Skip to main content

Techniques and Optimization

  • Chapter
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Summary

In this chapter, we discuss the factors that affect image quality of DW-MRI and practical methods to improve the quality of DW-MR images obtained from clinical scanners. We demonstrate how simple phantoms may be used to improve image quality so that high-quality images can be attained consistently. We review the relative merits of fat-suppression schemes and how these may be applied to different clinical applications. We discuss the optimization of b-values and the number of b-values required for clinical imaging and further illustrate the range of considerations required for these choices. We survey the different data acquisition methods using breath-holding, physiological gating or free breathing, and how the choice of data acquisition method may relate to a particular scanning application. Finally, we provide recommendations to enable the reader to develop their own practical diffusion-weighted imaging protocols in the body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander AL, Tsuruda JS, Parker DL (1997) Elimination of eddy current artifacts in diffusion-weighted echo-planar images: the use of bipolar gradients. Magn Reson Med 38:1016–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bammer R, Auer M, Keeling SL et al (2002) Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn Reson Med 48:128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bammer R, Keeling SL, Augustin M et al (2001) Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn Reson Med 46:548–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bito Y, Hirata S, Yamamoto E (1995) Optimum gradient factors for apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 913

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge M, Wilton B, et al (2009). “Computed Diffusion Weighted Imaging (cDWI) for Improving Imaging Contrast.” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.: 4005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M et al (2004) SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15:223–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodammer N, Kaufmann J, Kanowski M et al (2004) Eddy current correction in diffusion-weighted imaging using pairs of images acquired with opposite diffusion gradient polarity. Magn Reson Med 51:188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZG, Li TQ, Hindmarsh T (2001) Diffusion tensor trace mapping in normal adult brain using single-shot EPI technique. A methodological study of the aging brain. Acta Radiol 42:447–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gudbjartsson H, Patz S (1995) The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Reson Med 34:910–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A (1999) Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 42:515–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley PB (2006a) Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: part II. Anisotropy, diffusion-weighting factors, and gradient encoding schemes. Concepts Magn Reson A 28A:123–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley PB (2006b) Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: part III. Tensor calculation, noise, simulations, and optimization. Concepts Magn Reson A 28A:155–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch M, Norris DG (2000) An assessment of eddy current sensitivity and correction in single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging. Phys Med Biol 45:3821–3832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DW-MRIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkman DJ, Nunes RG (2007) Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 52:R15–R55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bihan D, Poupon C, Amadon A et al (2006) Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 24:478–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Sun F, Jin ZY et al (2007) Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: technical improvement and preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1139–1144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks M P, Olivot JM, Kemp S et al (2008) Patients with acute stroke treated with intravenous tPA 3–6 hours after stroke onset: correlations between MR angiography findings and perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging in the DEFUSE study. Radiology 249:614–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price WS (1998) Pulsed-field gradient NMR as a tool for studying translational diffusion. Part II: experimental aspects. Concepts Magn Reson 10:197–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB et al (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM et al (2003) Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 49:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas EU, Lee JH, Nishimura DG (2007) Optimum b-value vs. SNR for apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Saritas EU, Lee JH, Nishimura DG (2008) Effects of T2 -weighting on optimum b-value vs. SNR for ADC measurements. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 1798

    Google Scholar 

  • Stejskal EO, Tanner JE (1965) Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 42:288–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts PS, Lloyd D, Clark CA et al (2000) Test liquids for quantitative MRI measurements of self-diffusion coefficient in vivo. Magn Reson Med 43:368–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collins, D.J., Blackledge, M. (2010). Techniques and Optimization. In: Koh, D.M., Thoeny, H.C. (eds) Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78576-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78576-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78575-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78576-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics