Skip to main content

Evaluation of Lymph Nodes Using DW-MRI

  • Chapter
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 2028 Accesses

Summary

Presence of lymph node metastases and thus prediction of nodal malignancy remains one of the most important challenges in treatment and prognosis of patients with cancer. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI) can identify differences in molecular water mobility in the extracellular spaces, reflecting cellular organization and density, microstructure and microcirculation. Improvements in DW-MRI techniques have overcome most of the drawbacks and limitations of whole-body imaging and enables nodal characterization. The generally higher cellularity of malignant lymph nodes facilitates their detection on high b-value DW-MR images, even in lymph nodes which are normal in size. Using quantitative ADC evaluation, pre-surgi-cal assessment based on ADC threshold values may be valuable but must be interpreted with caution given the varying cut-off values for malignancy published in the literature. Moreover, necrotic areas, often encountered with squamous cell carcinomas, and inflammatory nodal hyperplasia accompanied by increased cellularity and nodal heterogeneity remain limitations when ADC values are applied to characterize nodal disease. ADC mapping relative to the primary tumour or standardized to reference structures such as the renal cortex, together with increased spatial resolution may further improve the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI. In the future, combining DW-MRI with lymphotrophic agents such as ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) may enhance detection and characterization of lymph nodes. The pre-sur-gical planning for lymphadenectomy, radiotherapy and follow-up of oncological patients will profit from well-conducted DW-MRI studies even though histopathology remains the gold standard for nodal staging. The impact of DW-MRI on clinical practice for confident identification and risk strati-fication of patients for nodal metastases remains to be clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent diffusion coefficient

DW-MRI:

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

FDG:

2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose

NPV:

Negative-predictive value

PET:

Positron emission tomography

PET-CT:

Integrated PET/CT device

PPV:

Positive-predictive value

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

Sens:

Sensitivity

Spec:

Specificity

USPIO:

Ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide

References

  • Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Ta w fik A (2006) Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 16:1468–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akduman EI, Momtahen AJ, Balci NC, Mahajann N, Havlioglu N, Wolverson MK (2008) Comparison between malignant and benign abdominal lymph nodes on diffusion-weighted imaging. Acad Radiol 15:641–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellin MF, Lebleu L, Meric JB (2003) Evaluation of retroperito-neal and pelvic lymph node metastases with MRI and MR lymphography. Abdom Imaging 28:155–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briganti A (2009) How to improve the ability to detect pelvic lymph node metastases of urologic malignancies. Eur Urol 55:770–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi KD, Jo JW, Park KP, Kim JS, Lee TH, Kim HJ, Jung DS (2007)Diffusion-weighted imaging of intramural hema toma in vertebral artery dissection. J Neurol Sci 253:81–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa F, Gerali A, Alessi A, Agresti R, Bombardieri E (2004): FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bondt RB, Hoeberigs MC, Nelemans PJ, Deserno WM, Peutz-Kootstra C, Kremer B, Beets-Tan RG (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 51:183–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Escalona S, Blasco JA, Reza MM, Andradas E, Gomez N (2009) A systemic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer. Med Oncol DOI 10.1007/s12032-009-9182-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Facey K, Bradbury I, Laking G, Payne E (2007) Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technol Assess 11:III–IV; XI–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr MK, Hornung R, Varga Z, Burger D, Hess T, Haller U, Fink D, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC (2004) Axillary staging using positron emission tomography in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast J 10:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goerres GW, Michel SC, Fehr MK, Kaim AH, Steinert HC, Seifert B, von Schulthess GK, Kubik-Huch RA (2003) Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET. Eur Radiol 13:1635–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm B, Caseiro-Alves F, Bellin M-F, Padhani A, Passariello R, Roy C (2007) USPIO-enhanced intravenous MR lymphogra-phy for staging pelvic cancers: results of a European multicenter phase III trial including 271 patients. RSNA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, Deserno WM, Tabatabaei S, van de Kaa CH, de la Rosette J, Weissleder R (2003) Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 19:2491–2499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harisinghani MG, Saksena MA, Hahn PF, King B, Kim J, Torabi MT, Weissleder R (2006) Ferumoxtran-10 enhanced MR lymphangiography: does contrast-enhanced imaging alone suffice for accurate lymph node characterization? AJR 186:144–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa I, Boiselle PM, Kuwabara K, Sawafuji M, Sugiura H (2008)Mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary experience with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Thorac Imaging 23:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heesakkers RA, Hövels AM, Jager GJ, van den Bosch HC, Witjes JA, Raat HP, Severens JL, Adang EM, van der Kaa CH, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz J (2008) MRI with a lymph node spe-cific contrast agent as an alternative to CT scan and lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 9:850–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heesakkers RA, Jager GJ, Hövels AM, de Hoop B, van den Bosch HC, Raat F, Witjes JA, Mulders PF, van der Kaa Ch, Barentsz JO (2009) Prostate cancer: detection of lymph node metastases outside the routine surgical area with ferumoxtran-10 enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 251:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Von Knobloch R (2002) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. J Urol 167:1681–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig D, Baum RP, Kirsch C (2009) FDG-PET, PET/CT and conventional nuclear medicine procedures in the evaluation of lung cancer: a systematic review. Nuklearmedizin 48:59–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, Eiber M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J (2008) Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.034

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho KS (2008) Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of meta-static from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:714–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King AD, Tse GM, Ahuja AT, Yuen EH, Vlantis AC, To EW, van Hasselt AC (2004) Necrosis in metastatic neck nodes: diagnostic accuracy of CT, MR imaging, and US. Radiology 230:720–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, Fong DK, Lee YY, Lei KI, Tse GM (2007)Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 245:806–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kodama J, Seki N, Nakamura K, Hongo A, Hiramatsu Y (2007) Prognostic factors in pathologic parametrium-positive patients with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer treated by radical surgery and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 105:757–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, Nievelstein RAJ, Luijten PR (2008)Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with back ground body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwee TC, Takahara T, Luijten PR; Nievelstein RAJ (2009) ADC measurements of lymph nodes: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility study and an overview of the literature. Eur J Radiol DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.026

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ, et al (2008) Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovrics PJ, Chen V, Coates G, Cornacchi SD, Goldsmith CH, Law C, Levine MN, Sanders K, Tandan VR (2004) A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dissection for axillary staging in patients with early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 11:846–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutman C V, Havrilesky LJ, Cragun JM, Secord AA, Calingaert B, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL, Soper JT (2006) Pelvic lymph node count is an important prognostic variable for FIGO stage I and II endometrial carcinoma with high-risk histology. Gynecol Oncol 102:92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M, Nara-bayashi I, Yamada T (2008) Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:764–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomori H, Mori T, Ikeda K, Kawanaka K, Shiraishi S, Katahira K, Yamashita Y (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can be used in place of positron emission tomography for N staging of non-small cell lung cancer with fewer false-positive results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:816–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ono K, Ochiai R, Yoshida T, Kitagawa M, Omagari J, Kobayashi H, Yamashita Y (2009) Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detecting primary colorectal cancer and regional lymph node metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:336–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park SO, Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho G, Choi HJ, Cho KS (2009) Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:383–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG, Babar SA, Singh N, Jeyarajah AR, Oram DH, Jacobs IJ, Shepherd JH, Reznek RH (2005) Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:2813–2821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurada A, Takahara T, Kwee TC, Yamashita T, Nasu S, Horie T, Van Cauteren M, Imai Y (2009) Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in esoph-ageal cancer. Eur Radiol 19:1461–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiavina R, Scattoni V, Castellucci P, Picchio M, Corti B, Briganti A, Franceschelli A, Sanguedolce F, Bertaccini A, Farsad M, Giovacchini G, Fanti S, Grigioni WF, Fazio F, Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Martorana G (2008) 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. Eur Urol 54:392–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silvera S, Oppenheim C, Touzé E, Ducreux D, Page P, Domigo V, Mas JL, Roux FX, Frédy D, Meder JF (2005) Spontaneous intracerebral hematoma on diffusion-weighted images: influence of T2-shine-through and T2-blackout effects. AJNR 26:236–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stattaus J, Bockisch A, Forsting M, Müller SP (2005) Value of imaging for lymph node metastases from renal cell, bladder, prostate, penile, and testicular cancers. Urologe A 44:614–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, Morikawa M, Uetani M, Kabasawa H, Shigeno K, Hayashi K, Takahashi H, Nakamura T (2003) Discrimination of metastatic lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR 24:1627–1634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Nakamura T (2006) MR micro-imaging of benign and malignant nodes in the neck. AJR 186:749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suoglu Y, Erdamar B, Katircioglu OS, Karatay MC, Sunay T (2002) Extracapsular spread in ipsilateral neck and contralateral neck metastases in laryngeal cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111:447–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M (2004) Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat Med 22:275–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Oyen RH, Peeters RR (2005) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience. Radiology 235:911–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoeny HC, Triantafyllou M, Birkhaeuser FD, Froehlich JM, Tshering DW, Binser T, Fleischmann A, Vermathen P, Studer UE (2009) Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reliably detect pelvic lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes of bladder and prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol 55:761–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafyllou M, Binser T, Birkhaeuser F, Studer UE, Fleischmann A, von Gunten M, Froehlich JM, Vermathen P, Thoeny HC (2009) Diffusion-weighted MRI to detect pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with bladder or prostate cancer: comparison with histopathology as gold standard. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Hermans R (2008) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in neck lymph ade-nopathy. Cancer Imaging 8:173–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Poorten V V, Dirix P, Verbeken E, Nuyts S, Hermans R (2009) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 251:134–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch H, Loose D, Ham H, Otte A, Van de Wiele C (2003) Nuclear medicine imaging for the assessment of primary and recurrent head and neck carcinoma using routinely available tracers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:1689–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl RL, Siegel BA, Coleman RE, Gatsonis CG; PET Study Group (2004) Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. J Clin Oncol 22:277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White ML, Zhang Y, Robinson RA (2006) Evaluating tumours and tumourlike lesions of the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the adjacent skull base with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:490–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker CS, Coady A, Culver L, Rustin G, Padwick M, Padhani AR (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumours: a pictorial review. Radiographics 29:759–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xue HD, Li S, Sun F, Sun HY, Jin ZY, Yang JX, Yu M (2008) Clinical application of body diffusion weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and preoperative N staging of cervical cancer. Chin Med Sci J 23:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors of this chapter were supported by research grant no. 320000-113512/1 from the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research and Harriet C. Thoeny in addition from Carigest SA, Geneva.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Froehlich, J.M., Thoeny, H.C. (2010). Evaluation of Lymph Nodes Using DW-MRI. In: Koh, D.M., Thoeny, H.C. (eds) Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78576-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78576-7_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78575-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78576-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics