Skip to main content

Is ELIE a Wasteful Minimum Income Scheme?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

ELIE can be interpreted as a minimum income scheme, financed by lump-sum taxes. While Kolm is careful in stating that his theory of macrojustice does not apply to individuals voluntarily working less than the “initial equal labour” k, we consider an extended scheme in which equal-labour income equalisation is also applied to these individuals. This extended ELIE may induce social waste as individuals with a low taste for working may opt for voluntary unemployment. We simulate the magnitude of this social waste with microdata for Belgium and compare extended ELIE with a first-best scheme and a second-best scheme (based on a linear income tax), implementing the same minimum income. The social waste induced by extended ELIE is intermediate between the social waste induced by the first- and second-best schemes, and remains relatively small for realistic levels of redistribution. Assumptions about the preferences of the voluntarily unemployed play a crucial role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, A. (1990). Public economics and the economic public. European Economic Review, 34(2–3), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blundell, R., & MaCurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches. In O. Ashenfelter, & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, Chapter 27, pp. 1559–1695). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dasgupta, P., & Hammond, P. (1980). Fully progressive taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 13(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond, P. (1998). Optimal income taxation: an example with a U-Shaped pattern of optimal marginal tax rates. American Economic Review, 88(1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kolm, S.-C. (2004). Liberty and distribution: macrojustice from social freedom. Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 113–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolm, S.-C. (2005). Macrojustice, the political economy of fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simula, L., & Trannoy, A. (2011). When Kolm meets Mirrlees: ELIE. In M. Fleurbaey, M. Salles, & J. Weymark (Eds.), Social ethics and normative economics. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erwin Ooghe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ooghe, E., Schokkaert, E. (2011). Is ELIE a Wasteful Minimum Income Scheme?. In: Gamel, C., Lubrano, M. (eds) On Kolm's Theory of Macrojustice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78377-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78377-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78376-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78377-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics