Skip to main content

Emotional Intelligence: Giving Computers Effective Emotional Skills to Aid Interaction

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence: A Compendium

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 115))

Why do computers need emotional intelligence? Science fiction often portrays emotional computers as dangerous and frightening, and as a serious threat to human life. One of the most famous examples is HAL, the supercomputer onboard the spaceship Discovery, in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. HAL could express, recognize and respond to human emotion, and generally had strong emotional skills — the consequences of which were catastrophic. However, since the movie’s release almost 40 years ago, the traditional view of emotions as contributing to irrational and unpredictable behavior has changed. Recent research has suggested that emotions play an essential role in important areas such as learning, memory, motivation, attention, creativity, and decision making. These findings have prompted a large number of research groups around the world to start examining the role of emotions and emotional intelligence in human-computer interaction (HCI).

For almost half a century, computer scientists have been attempting to build machines that can interact intelligently with us, and despite initial optimism, they are still struggling to do so. For much of this time, the role of emotion in developing intelligent computers was largely overlooked, and it is only recently that interest in this area has risen dramatically. This increased interest can largely be attributed to the work of [6] and [85] who were amongst the first to bring emotion to the attention of computer scientists. The former highlighted emotion as a fundamental component required in building believable agents, while the latter further raised the awareness of emotion and its potential importance in HCI. Since these publications, the literature on emotions and computing has grown considerably with progress being made on a number of different fronts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banse R, Scherer K (1996) Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 614-636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron RA (1996) Interviewer’s mood and reaction to job applicants. J. Applied Social Psychology, 17: 911-926.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartneck C (2001) How Convincing is Mr. Data’s Smile: affective expressions of machines. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11: 279-295.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartneck C (2002) eMuu - an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home. PhD Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartneck C (2002) Integrating the OCC model of emotions in embodied characters. Proc. Workshop on Virtual Conversational Characters: Appli-cations, Methods, and Research Challenges (available online at: http:// www.bartneck.de/work/bartneck hf2002.pdf - last accessed: 14 October 2006).

  6. Bates J (1994) How Convincing is Mr. Data’s Smile: affective expressions of machines. Communications ACM, 37(7): 122-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beskow J, McGlashan S (1997) Olga - a conversational agent with gestures. In: André E, et al. (eds) Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. AI’97, Workshop on Animated Interface Agents - Making them Intelligent. 25 August, Nagoya, Japan. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bickmore T(2003) Relational agents: effecting change through human-computer relationships. PhD Thesis, Department of Media Arts and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bickmore T, Cassell J (2001) Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: Beaudouin-Lafon M, Jacob R (eds) Proc. ACM CHI 2001- Human Factors in Computing Systems Conf., 31 March-5 April, Seattle, WA. ACM Press, New York, NY: 396-403.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bickmore T, Picard R (2005) Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 122: 293-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bosseler A, Massaro DW (2003) Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. J. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 336: 653-672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bower GH (1981) Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36: 129-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brave S, Nass C, Hutchinson K (2005) Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. Intl. J. Human-Computer Studies, 622: 161-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Assema PV, Vries HD (1996) The Impact of a Computer-Tailored Nutrition Intervention. Preventive Medicine, 2552: 236-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buller D, Street R (1992) Physician-patient relationships. In: Feldman R (ed) Application of Nonverbal behavioral Theories and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ: 119-141.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burleson W, Picard R (2004) Affective agents: sustaining motivation to learn through failure and a state of stuck. Proc. Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments Workshop(in conjunction with the 7th Intl. Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems), 31 August, available online at: http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/04.burleson-picard.pdf (last accessed: 14 October 2006).

  17. Cacioppo JT, Bernston GG, Klein DJ, Poehlmann KM (1997) Psychophys-iology of emotion across the life span. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17: 27-74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cacioppo JT, Bernston GG, Larsen JT, Poehlmann KM, Ito TA (2000) The psychophysiology of emotion. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jone (eds) Handbook of Emotions. The Guildford Press, New York, NY: 173-191.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cahn J (1990) The generation of affect in synthesised speech. J. American Voice I/O Society, 8: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canamero LD (ed) (1998) Emotional and Intelligent: The Tangled Knot of Cognition (Papers from the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Canamero LD (ed) (2001) Emotional and Intelligent II: The Tangled Knot of Social Cognition (Papers from the 2001 AAAI Fall Symposium). AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cassell J, Stocky T, Bickmore T, Gao Y, Nakano Y, Ryokai K, Tversky D, Vilhjalmsson CVH (2002) Mack: Media lab autonomous conversational kiosk. Proc. Intl. Festival for Digital Images - IMAGINA’02, 12-15 February, available online at: http://www.soc.northwestern.edu/justine/publications/imagina02.pdf (last accessed: 14 October 2006).

  23. Cassell J, Sullivan J, Prevost S, Churchill E(eds)(2000) Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Christianson SA, Loftus E (1991) Remembering emotional events: the fate of detailed information. Cognition and Emotion, 5: 81-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cialdini R (2003) Influence: Science and Practice. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E (1996) Automatic statistical analysis of the signal and prosodic signs of emotion in speech. In: Bunnell T, Idsardi W (eds) Proc. 4th Intl. Conf. Spoken Language Processing. 3-6 October, Philadelphia, PA. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ: 1989-1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E, Tsapatsoulis N, Votsis G, Kollias S, Fellenz W (2001) Emotion recognition in human-computer interaction. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 181: 32-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Creed C (2006) Using Computational Agents to Motivate Diet Change. In: IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y, Midden C, van den Hoven E (eds) Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. Persuasive Technology for Human Well-being. 18-19 May, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands. Springer, Berlin: 100-103.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Creed C, Beale R (2006) Agent Abuse: The Potential Dangers of Socially Intelligent Embodied Agents. In: De Angeli A et al., (eds) Proc. Work-shop on Misuse and Abuse of Interactive Technologies (in cooperation with Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI2006). 22 April, Montreal, Canada: 17-20.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Creed C, Beale R (2006) Embodied Interfaces: The Next Generation of HCI? In: Jacobs R (ed) Proc. Workshop on The Next Generation of HCI (in cooper-ation with Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI2006). 23 April, Tufts University, Montreal, Canada: 96-99.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Curry S, Kristal A, Bowen D (1992) An application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction. Health Education Research, 7: 97-105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Damasio A (1994) Descartes Error. Macmillan, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Davidson RJ (1994) On emotion, mood, and other related affective con-structs. In: Ekman P, Davidson RJ (eds) The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford University Press, New York, NY: 51-55.

    Google Scholar 

  34. DAZ-Productions (2006) Mimic 3. http://www.daz3d.com/Mimic/poser.php (last accessed: 2 August 2006).

  35. de Rosis F (2002) Toward merging cognition and affect in HCI. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 167-8: 487-494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Duncker K (1945) On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs,855:1-113.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E-Frontier (2006) Poser 5 Software. http://www.e-frontier.com/ (last accessed: 2 August 2006).

  38. Ekman P (1972) Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In: Cole J (ed) Proc. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln: 207-283.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ekman P (1994) All emotions are basic. In: Ekman P, Davidson RJ (eds) The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford University Press, New York, NY: 7-19.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ekman P, Davidson RJ (eds) The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1975) Unmasking the Face. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1977) Facial Action Coding System. Consluting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Essa IA, Pentland AP (1997) Coding, analysis, interpretation, and recognition of facial expressions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 197: 757-763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Etcoff NL, Magee JJ (1992) Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition, 44: 227-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Evans D (2001) Emotion: the Science of Sentiment. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fenichel M, Suler JR, Barak A, Zelvin E, Jones G, Munro K, Meunier V, Walker-Schmucker W (2002) Myths and realities of online clinical work. CyberPsychology and behavior, 55: 481-497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Foa EB, Feske U, Murdoch TB, Kozak MJ, McCarthy PR (1989) Processing of threat-related information in rape victims. J. Abnormal Psychology, 45: 1183-1187.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fogg BJ, Nass C (1997) Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. Intl. J. Human Computer Studies, 465: 551-561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedman RH (1997) Automated Telephone Conversations to Assess Health Behavior and Deliver Behavioral Interventions. J. Medical Systems, 222: 95-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Friedman RH, Stollerman J, Mahoney D, Rozenblyum L (1997) The Vir-tual Visit: Using Telecommunications Technology to Take Care of Patients. J. American Medical Informatics Association, 45: 413-425.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Frijda N (1994) Varieties of affect: emotions and episodes, moods and senti-ments. In: Ekman P, Davidson RJ (eds) The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. Oxford University Press, New York, NY: 59-67.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Givens DB (2002) The Nonverbal Dictionary of Gestures, Signs, and Body Language Cues. Center for Nonverbal Studies Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Goleman D (1996) Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Goleman D (2004) Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ & Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gratch J, Marsells S (2004) A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. J. Cognitive Systems Research, 54: 269-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Griffiths P (1997) What Emotions Really Are. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hirst G, Dimarco C, Hovy E, Parsons K (1997) Authoring and generating health-education documents that are tailored to the needs of the individual patient. In: Jameson A, Paris C, Tasso C (eds) Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. User Modeling - UM97. 2-5 June, Vienna, Austria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 107-118.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 526: 1122-1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Isen AM, Rosenzweig AS, Young MJ (1991) The influence of positive affect on clinical problem solving. Medical Decision Making, 11: 221-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Izard CE (1971) The Face of Emotion. Appleton-Century Crofts, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jacobs M (1999) Psychodynamic Counselling in Action. Sage Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kids Helpline http://kidshelp.com.au/home-KHL.aspx?S=6 (last accessed 14 August 2006).

  63. Klein J, Moon Y, Picard R (2002) This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers, 142: 119-140.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lang PJ (1995) The emotion probe. American Psychologist, 505: 372-385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ledoux J (1996) The Emotional Brain. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lester J, Converse S, Kahler S, Barlow T, Stone B, Bhogal R (1997) The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: Pember-ton S (ed) Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’9722-27 March, Atlanta, GA. ACM Press, New York: 359-366.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Lester JC, Stone B, Stelling G (1999) Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 91-2: 1-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lisetti CL, Schiano DJ (2000) Automatic facial expression interpretation: where human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence and cognitive sci-ence intersect. Pragmatics and Cognition (Special Issue on Facial Information Processing: A Multidisciplinary Perspective), 81: 185-235.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Liu K, Pickard R (2005) Embedded Empathy in Continuous, Interactive Health Assessment. Proc. Computer-Human Interaction Workshop on Computer-Human Interaction Challenges in Health Assessment.4April(available online at: http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/05.liu-picard.pdf - last accessed: 14 October 2006).

  70. Lyons M, Kamachi M, Gyoba J (1998) Coding facial expressions with gabor wavelets. In: Yachida M (ed) Proc. 3rd IEEE Intl. Conf. Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. 14-16 April, Nara, Japan: 200-205.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mackie DM, Worth LT (1989) Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 27-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mayer JD, Caruso DR, Salovey P (2000) Emotional Intelligence Meets Traditional Standards for an Intelligence. Intelligence, 274: 267-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Mayer JD, Salovey P (1997) What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P, Slu-tyer D (eds) Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications. Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  74. McGilloway S, Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E, Gielen S, Westerdijk M, Stroeve S (2000) Approaching Automatic Recognition of Emotion from Voice: A Rough Benchmark. In: Cowie R, Douglas-Cowie E, Schroder M (eds) Proc. Intl. Speech Communication Association (ISCA) - Workshop on Speech and Emotion. 5-7 September, Newcastle, UK: 207-212.

    Google Scholar 

  75. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF (1981) Manual of the Profile of Mood States. Educational and Industrial Testing Services, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  76. MoodGym http://www.moodgym.anu.ed.au/ (last accessed: 14 August 2006).

  77. Murray IR, Arnott JL (1993) Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion. J. Acoustical Society of America, 932: 1097-1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Nass C, Brave S (2005) Wired for Speech. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nass C, Lee KM (2001) Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. J. Experimental Psychology: Applied, 73: 171-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Dryer DC (1995) Can computer per-sonalities be human personalities? Intl. J. Human Computer Studies, 432: 223-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Nass C, Moon Y, Fogg BJ, Reeves B, Dryer DC (1999) Are respondents polite to computers? social desirability and direct responses to computers. J. Applied Social Psychology, 295: 1093-1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Oatley K, Jenkins JM (1996) Understanding Emotions. Educational and Industrial Testing Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ortony A, Clore G, Collins A (1988) The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pavia A (ed) (2000) Affective Interactions: Towards a New Generation of Computer Interfaces. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Paleari M, Lisetti CL (2006) Psychologically Grounded Avatars Expressions. In: Reichardt D, Levi P, Meyer C (eds) Emotion and Computing - Current Research and Future Impact (Workshop at 29th Annual German Conf. Artificial Intelligence - KI 2006). 19 June, Bremen, Germany. University of Bremen: 39-42.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Perlin K (1997) Responsive Face. http://mrl.nyu.edu/perlin/facedemo/(last accessed: 2 August 2006).

  87. Picard R (1997) Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Picard R, Vyzas E, Healy J (2001) Toward Machine Emotional Intelligence: Analysis of Affective Physiological State. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2310:1175-1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Picard RW, Klein J (2002) Computers that recognise and respond to user emotion: theoretical and practical implications. Interacting with Computers, 142: 141-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Plantect P (2004) Virtual Humans. Amacon, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Redding CA, Rossi JS, Rossi SR, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO (2000) Health behavior Models. Intl. Electronic J. Health Education, 3: 180-193.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Revere D, Dunbar P (2001) Review of oomputer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters ‘in absentia’. J. American Medical Informatics Association, 81: 62-79.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rickel J, Johnson WL (1999) Animated agents for procedural training in virtual reality: Perception, cognition, and motor control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13: 343-382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9: 185-211.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Scheirer J, Fernandez R, Klein J, Picard RW (2002) Frustrating the user on purpose: a step towards building an affective computer. Interacting with Computers, 14: 93-118.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Sloman A (ed) (1999) Architectural requirements for human-like agents both natural and artificial(what sorts of machines can love?). John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Stroop JR(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Experimental Psychology, 18: 643-662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Suler JR (2000) Psychotherapy in cyberspace: a five-dimensional model of online and computer-mediated psychotherapy. CyberPsychology and behavior, 32: 151-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Takeuchi A, Naito T (1995) Situated facial displays: towards social interaction. In: Katz IR, et al. (eds) Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’95 Denver, CO, 7-11 May. ACM Press, New York, NY: 450-455.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Thorisson KR (1999) A mind model for multimodal communicative creatures and humanoids. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 134-5: 449-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Tian YI, Kanade T, Cohn JF (2001) Recognizing action units for facial expression analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 232: 97-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Trappl R, Petta P (eds) (1997) Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (eds) (2003) Emotions in Humans and Artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  105. van Mulken S, Andrè E, Müller (1998) The persona effect: how substantial is it? In: Johnson H, Laurence N, Roast C (eds) Proc. HCI Conf. on People and Computers XIII - HCI ’98 1-4 September, Sheffield, UK. Springer-Verlag, London: 53-66.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Wang H, Predinger H, Igarashi T (2004) Communicating Emotions in Online Chat Using Physiological Sensors and Animated Text. In: Dykstra-Erickson E, Tscheligi M (eds) Human Factors in Computing Systems - Late Break-ing Results.(Proc. ACM CHI 2004 Conf.) 24-29 April, Vienna, Austria, ACM Press, New York, NY: 1171-1174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Creed, C., Beale, R. (2008). Emotional Intelligence: Giving Computers Effective Emotional Skills to Aid Interaction. In: Fulcher, J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Computational Intelligence: A Compendium. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 115. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78293-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78293-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78292-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78293-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics