Skip to main content

Ressourcen-Bewertung von Innovationsprojekten zwischen „lean“ und „slack“

  • Chapter
  • 6776 Accesses

Part of the book series: VDI-Buch ((VDI-BUCH))

Abstract

Die Betrachtung der Ressourcen für FuE-Aktivitäten im allgemeinen, als auch im Rahmen der strategischen FuE Planung mittels des Technologie-Portfolios im besonderen ist ein zentraler Punkt des Innovations-Managements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Albach, H., Audretsch, D. B., Fleischer, M., Greb, R., Höfs, E., Röller, L.-H. Schulz, I. (1996), Innovation in the European Chemical Industry, Discussion Paper FS IV 96–26, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augsdorfer, P. (1996), ‘Forbidden Fruit: an analysis of bootlegging, uncertainty, and learning in corporate R&D’, DPhil dissertation, Science Policy Research Unit: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of slack. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1) 29–39, p. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J., J. V. Singh. 1983. Organizational slack and political behavior within top management groups. Acad. Management Proceedings. 43, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2: 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Rosenbloom, R. S., 1995. Explaining the attackers advantage: technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy 24, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimick, D. E., Murray, V. V., 1978, Correlates of Substantive Policy Decisions in Organizations: The Case of Human Resource Management. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Dec., 1978), pp. 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M. J. (1995), Regional Clusters and Economic Development: A Research Agenda, Paper prepared for the Conference on Regional Clusters and Business Networks, November 18–20, Fredericton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R., “Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage”, Summit Books, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, S. W., Cashen, L. H. 2002. A Multidimensional Examination of Slack and its Impact on Innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues, XIV(I): 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003) A Behavioral Theory of R&Dx Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding. Working paper of the Norwegian School of Management BI, Department of Strategy: http://home.bi.no/a0210001/ BehavInnovAMJ.pdf; Forthcoming in the Academy of Management Journal February 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E., (1967) Technological Forecasting in Perspective., Paris OECD pp. 151; Robert U. Ayres (1969), Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning, McGraw Hill, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76: 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. (2001), Pc R&D Is A-Ok-Industry Trend or Event. In: Industry Standard, The, May 21, 2001. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HWW/is_20_4/ai_75098482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H., 1969. Organisational or frictional equiplibria, X-efficiency, and the rate of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83: 600–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., March, J. G., 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behaviour and Organ. 2(4) 307–333, p. 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metze, G., 1998, Rückbesinnung auf Pfeiffers frühe(re) Werke als Verpflichtung für die künftige Theorieentwicklung – aufgezeigt am “First-Follower-Prinzip” und am “Lean Management”. In: Weiß, E., Dirsch, H. (Hrsg.), Innovative Unternehmensführung. Festgabe zum 65. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr. Werner Pfeiffer, Forschungs- und Beratungsgruppe für innovative Unternehmensführung, Nürnberg, S. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., Hobday, M., Leroux-Demers, T., Olleros X. (1995): Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: the Case of Flight Simulation, in: Oxford University Press, Industrial and Corporate Change, Brighton 1995, pp. 363–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murmann, J. P., Frenken, K., (2002) Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change. Papers on Economics and Evolution from Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group; Working paper 12 2002,

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N. Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1245–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan, S., (2005) Examining Slack – Innovation Relationship: Longitudinal Evidence from the US Farm Equipment Industry (1996–2000). Paper to be presented at the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005 on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark, June 27–29, 2005, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W., Metze, G., Schneider, W., Amler, R. (zitiert als Pfeiffer, W., et al.) (1991), Technologie-Portfolio zum Management strategischer Zukunftsgeschäftsfelder. 1. Auflage Göttingen 1982, 6. durchgesehene Auflage Göttingen 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelandt, T. J. A., Gerbrands, P. W. L., van Bergeijk, P. A. G., (2002): Markets and innovativeness: Does structure influence innovation performance? Research Memorandum 9902, Erasmus University Rotterdam, https://ep.eur.nl/bitstream /1765/844/1/rm9902.pdf,

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, M., (2005) Vertikale Spezialisierung und technologischer Kompetenzabbau? Eine empirische Analyse der Auswirkung der Reduzierung der Wertschöpfungstiefe auf das Technologieportfolio von Unternehmen. Beitrag im Rahmen der Fachtagung der Kommission Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. 7. Fachtagung der Kommission für Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement (TIM) im Verband der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft e.V., Universität Erfurt, 27.–29. November, Erfurt 2005 p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shehabuddeen, N. TMH., Probert D. R., Excavating the Technology Landscape: Deploying Technology Intelligence to Detect Early Warning Signals.International Engineering Management Conference 2004; 0-7803-8519-5/04/2004 IEEE; p. 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., Singh Chhatwal, S., Yahyabhoy, t., M., Heng, Y.,c.,(2002) DYNAMICS OF INNOVATION IN E-BANKING. Paper presented at ECIS 2002, June 6–8, Gdañsk, Poland, p. 1527–1537, p. 1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twiss B. C. (1995), Managing technological innovation, Pitman, Publishing, 4 Edt., U. K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauernschmid, P. (2008). Ressourcen-Bewertung von Innovationsprojekten zwischen „lean“ und „slack“. In: Mohnkopf, H., Hartmann, M., Metze, G., Schmeisser, W. (eds) Innovationserfolgsrechnung. VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78249-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics