Skip to main content

Reference Modeling for Higher Education Budgeting: Applying the H2 Toolset for Conceptual Modeling of Performance-Based Funding Systems

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4928))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2668 Accesses

Abstract

The Higher Education (HE) sector has gained remarkable economic importance worldwide. There is a huge amount of institutions competing in this dynamically evolving market. Emerging concepts like new public management advise to organize HE institutions as autonomous business units that can easily be adapted to market changes. In this context, methods of performance-based funding play an important role in governing the institutions both from an external and internal perspective. However, the right choice of indicators measuring the performance turns out to be a vital factor for the success of these budgeting methods. Wrongly chosen, they may even be misleading. Whereas most studies in this field suggest particular measurement systems, our focus of research is to provide a methodology for the design of individual measurement systems. As part of this method, techniques from reference modeling can be applied in order to reuse typical measures for special situations and then further adopt and extend them. In this paper, we study the modeling language H2 which may serve as an essential part of such a methodology. We conclude with an outlook on further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hüfner, K.: Governance and Funding of Higher Education in Germany. Higher Education in Europe 28(2), 145–163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnstone, D.B., Arora, A., Experton, W.: The Financing and Management of Higher Education: A Status Report on Worldwide Reforms. State University of New York at Buffalo (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liefner, I.: Funding, Resource Allocation, and Performance in Higher Education Systems. Higher Education 46(4), 469–489 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziegele, F.: Financial Autonomy of Higher Education Institutions: The Necessity and Design of an Institutional Framework. für Hochschulentwicklung, C., (ed.) Working Paper No. 17. Gütersloh (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ziegele, F.: Formelgebundene Budgetzuweisung und Zielvereinbarungen. Cordes, J., Roland, F., Westermann, G. (eds.): Hochschulmanagement – Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Hochschulsteuerung. Wiesbaden (2001) 189-205

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, J., Niehaves, B.: Epistemological Perspectives on IS Research – A Framework for Analyzing and Systematizing Epistemological Assumptions. Information Systems Journal 17(2), 197–214 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreysing, M.: Autonomy, Accountability, and Organizational Complexity in Higher Education: The Goettingen Model of University Reform. Journal of Educational Administration 40(6), 552–560 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public Management Reform – A Comparative Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsichritzis, D.: Reengineering the University. Communications of the ACM 42(6), 93–100 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen, D.K., Fifield, N.: Re-engineering Change in Higher Education. Information Research, Vol 4(3) [2007-06-01] (1999), http://informationr.net/ir/4-3/paper56.html

  11. Huisman, J.: Higher Education in Germany. In: CHEPS (Center for Higher Education Policy Studies), country report. Enschede (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaeger, M.: Leistungsorientierte Budgetierung: Analyse der Umsetzung an ausgewählten Universitäten und Fakultäten/Fachbereichen. Hochschul-Informationssystem (ed.), Kurzinformation A1. Hannover (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vroom, V. H.: Work and Motivation. New York, London, Sydney (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E.: Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E., Hackman, J.R.: Behaviour in Organisations. New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ziegele, F.: Das Zusammenwirken von formelgebundener Mittelzuweisung und Zielvereinbarung. In: Das Präsidium der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (ed.): Globalhaushalt in Niedersachsen – Erfahrungen, Beurteilungen, Perspektiven. Hochschulentwicklungsplanung, Oldenburg, vol. 41, pp.175-188 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegele, F.: Indikatorengestützte Mittelvergabe. In: Hanft, A. (ed.): Grundbegriffe des Hochschulmanagements. Bielefeld, pp. 195-201 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berens, W., Hoffjan, A.: Controlling in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Grundlagen, Fallstudien, Lösungen. Stuttgart (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Körber-Weik, M.: Indikatorsteuerungen – Durch neue Finanzierungsformeln zu besseren Hochschulen und wirksamerer Frauenförderung. In: Roloff, C. (ed.) Reformpotential an Hochschulen. Frauen als Akteurinnen in Hochschulreformprozessen, Berlin, pp. 153–178 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frank, U.: Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline – Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges. In: Haseman, W.D., Nazareth, D.L., Goodhue, D.L. (eds.) AMCIS 1999. Proceedings of the 5th America’s Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, pp. 695–697 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. vom Brocke, J.: Design Principles for Reference Modeling: Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialization, Instantiation, and Analogy. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.): Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, 47–75 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Knackstedt, R.: Adaptive Reference Modeling. Integrating Configurative and Generic Adaptation Techniques for Information Models. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling. Efficient Information Systems Design Through Reuse of Information Models, Berlin, pp. 23–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Becker, J., Janiesch, C., Pfeiffer, D., Seidel, S.: Evolutionary Method Engineering – Towards a Method for the Analysis and Conception of Management Information Systems. In: AMCIS 2006. Proceedings of the 12th America’s Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, pp. 3922–3933 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Delfmann, P., Janiesch, C., Knackstedt, R., Rieke, T., Seidel, S.: Towards Tool Support for Configurative Reference Modeling – Experiences from a Meta Modeling Teaching Case. In: WoMM 2006. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Meta-Modelling and Ontologies, Lecture Notes in Informatics, Karlsruhe, pp. 61–83 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holten, R.: The MetaMIS Approach for the Specification of Management Views on Business Processes. Department for Information Systems, University of Munster (ed.), Working Paper No. 84. Munster  (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holten, R., Dreiling, A.: Specification of Fact Calculations within the MetaMIS Approach. Department for Information Systems, University of Munster (ed.), Working Paper No. 88. Munster (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brüggemeier, M.: Controlling. In: Hanft, A. (ed.) Grundbegriffe des Hochschulmanagements, Bielefeld, pp. 58–67 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schütte, R.: Guidelines for Reference Modeling. Wiesbaden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. van der Aaalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: BPRM 2005. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Business Process Reference Models, Nancy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Küpper, H.: Management Mechanism and Financing of Higher Education in Germany. Higher Education Management and Policy 15, 71–89 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Arthur ter Hofstede Boualem Benatallah Hye-Young Paik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

vom Brocke, J., Buddendick, C., Simons, A. (2008). Reference Modeling for Higher Education Budgeting: Applying the H2 Toolset for Conceptual Modeling of Performance-Based Funding Systems. In: ter Hofstede, A., Benatallah, B., Paik, HY. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4928. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78237-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78238-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics