Skip to main content

Acquiring Generalized Domain-Range Restrictions

  • Conference paper
Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4933))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Proposing a certain notion of logical completeness as a novel quality criterion for ontologies, we identify and characterise a class of logical propositions which naturally extend domain and range restrictions commonly known from diverse ontology modelling approaches. We argue for the intuitivity of this kind of axioms and show that they fit equally well into formalisms based on rules as well as ones based on description logics. Extending the attribute exploration technique from formal concept analysis (FCA), we present an algorithm for the efficient interactive specification of all axioms of this form valid in a domain of interest. We compile some results that apply when role hierarchies and symmetric roles come into play and demonstrate the presented method in a small example.

This work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under the ReaSem project. We furthermore thank Pascal Hitzler and Johanna Völker for their valuable comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., et al. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Proc. of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004), pp. 723–731. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McGuinness, D., v. Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  4. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India: The Child Marriage Restraint Act. Act No. 19 of 1929 (1929), http://indiacode.nic.in

  5. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: Complexity boundaries for horn description logics. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grosof, B., et al.: Description logic programs: Combining logic programs with description logics. In: Proc. of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2003), pp. 48–57. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Busch, W.: Die fromme Helene. Diogenes (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganter, B.: Two basic algorithms in concept analysis. Technical Report 831, FB4, TH Darmstadt (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burmeister, P.: Merkmalimplikationen bei unvollständigem Wissen. In: Lex, W. (ed.) Arbeitstagung Begriffsanalyse und Künstliche Intelligenz, TU Clausthal, pp. 15–46 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ganter, B.: Attribute exploration with background knowledge. Theoretical Computer Science 217, 215–233 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Prediger, S.: Terminologische Merkmalslogik in der formalen Begriffsanalyse. In: Stumme, G., Ganter, B. (eds.) Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, pp. 99–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baader, F.: Computing a minimal representation of the subsumption lattice of all conjunctions of concepts defined in a terminology. In: Proceedings of KRUSE 1995, Santa Cruz, USA, pp. 168–178 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rudolph, S.: An FCA method for the extensional exploration of relational data. In: Ganter, B., de Moor, A. (eds.) Using Conceptual Structures, Contributions to ICCS 2003, Dresden, Germany, Shaker, Aachen, pp. 197–210 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rudolph, S.: Relational Exploration - Combining Description Logics and Formal Concept Analysis for Knowledge Specification. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Dissertation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baader, F., et al.: Completing description logic knowledge bases using formal concept analysis. In: Veloso, M.M. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 230–235 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dowling, W.F., Gallier, J.H.: Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional Horn formulae. J. Log. Program. 1, 267–284 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Maier, D.: The Theory of Relational Databases. Computer Science Press (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guigues, J.L., Duquenne, V.: Familles minimales d’implications informatives resultant d’un tableau de données binaires. Math. Sci Humaines 95, 5–18 (1986)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zickwolff, M.: Rule Exploration: First Order Logic in Formal Concept Analysis. PhD thesis, FB4, TH Darmstadt (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ganter, B., Rudolph, S.: Formal concept analysis methods for dynamic conceptual graphs. In: Delugach, H.S., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2120, pp. 143–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rudolph, S.: Exploring relational structures via FLE. In: Wolff, K.E., Pfeiffer, H.D., Delugach, H.S. (eds.) ICCS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3127, pp. 196–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rudolph, S., Völker, J., Hitzler, P.: Supporting lexical ontology learning by relational exploration. In: Hill, R., Polovina, S., Priss, U. (eds.) Proceedings of ICCS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ganter, B.: Finding closed sets under symmetry. Technical Report 1307, FB4, TH Darmstadt (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Raoul Medina Sergei Obiedkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rudolph, S. (2008). Acquiring Generalized Domain-Range Restrictions. In: Medina, R., Obiedkov, S. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4933. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78137-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78137-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78136-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78137-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics