Skip to main content

Improving Question Answering by Combining Multiple Systems Via Answer Validation

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2008)

Abstract

Nowadays there exist several kinds of question answering systems. According to recent evaluation results, most of these systems are complementary (i.e., each one is better than the others in answering some specific type of questions). This fact indicates that a pertinent combination of various systems may allow improving the best individual result. This paper focuses on this problem. It proposes using an answer validation method to handle this combination. The main advantage of this approach is that it does not rely on internal system’s features nor depend on external answer’s redundancies. Experimental results confirm the appropriateness of our proposal. They mainly show that it outperforms individual system’s results as well as the precision obtained by a redundancy-based combination strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vallin, A., et al.: Overview of the clef 2005 multilingual question answering track. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 307–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Peñas, A., et al.: Overview of the answer validation exercise 2006. In: [14], pp. 257–264 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Magnini, B., et al.: Is it the right answer? exploiting web redundancy for answer validation. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, July 6-12, 2002, pp. 425–432 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dietterich, T.G.: Machine-learning research: Four current directions. The AI Magazine 18(4), 97–136 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pizzato, L.A.S., Molla-Aliod, D.: Extracting exact answers using a meta question answering system. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop, Sydney, Australia, December 2005, pp. 105–112 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chu-Carroll, J., et al.: In question answering, two heads are better than one. In: Proceedings of the HLTNAACL, pp. 24–31 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rotaru, M., Litman, D.J.: Improving question answering for reading comprehension tests by combining multiple systems. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) 2005 Workshop on Question Answering in Restricted Domains, Pittsburgh, PA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jijkoun, V., de Rijke, M.: Answer selection in a multi-stream open domain question answering system. In: McDonald, S., Tait, J.I. (eds.) ECIR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2997, pp. 99–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aceves-Pérez, R.M., y Gómez, M.M., Pineda, L.V.: Graph-based answer fusion in multilingual question answering. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P. (eds.) TSD 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4629, pp. 621–629. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dagan, I., Magnini, B., Glickman, O.: The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In: Proceedings of Pascal Challenge Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK, April 2005, pp. 1–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carreras, X., et al.: Freeling: An open-source suite of language analyzers. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peñas, A., Rodrigo, Á., Verdejo, F.: SPARTE, a test suite for recognising textual entailment in spanish. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2006. LNCS, vol. 3878, pp. 275–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Magnini, B., et al.: Overview of the CLEF 2006 multilingual question answering track. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730, pp. 223–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Peters, C., et al. (eds.): CLEF 2006. LNCS, vol. 4730. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Gelbukh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Téllez-Valero, A., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Villaseñor-Pineda, L., Peñas, A. (2008). Improving Question Answering by Combining Multiple Systems Via Answer Validation. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78134-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78135-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics