Abstract
The concept of Value at Risk (VaR) is eminently intuitive and easy to interpret. However, there are two major problems in its practical application: reliable estimations are difficult to perform and using the VaR as a constraint in portfolio optimization causes computational problems. Both problems are taken into account in the present application. First, the VaR based on estimates of the conditional covariance matrix with the ”Principal Components GARCH model” (PC GARCH model) is calculated. Second, recent advances in heuristic optimization (a modified version of Memetic Algorithms) are applied in order to deal with the computational problems. The computational study indicates that the proposed method for estimating the conditional covariance matrix, the PC GARCH model, results in much better approximations of the conditional volatility structure than a simple historical estimate. This advantage in modelling is exploited by the optimization algorithm to identify portfolios with higher expected return given a fixed VaR constraint. However, adjusting the portfolio to the dynamic approximations of the conditional volatility structure also results in some overconfidence with regard to the risk constraint.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, C.: 2001, Orthogonal GARCH, in C. Alexander (ed.), Mastering Risk, Vol. 2, FT-Prentice Hall, London, pp. 21–38.
Alexander, C. and Chibumba, A.: 1996, Multivariate orthogonal factor GARCH, Discussion Papers in Mathematics, University of Sussex.
Alexander, G.J. and Baptista, A.M.: 2004, A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model, Management Science 50(9), 1261–1273.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: 2003, Consultative document: The new Basel capital accord, Bank for International Settlement, www.bis.org.
Benati, S.: 2003, The optimal portfolio problem with coherent risk measure constraints, European Journal of Operational Research 150, 572–584.
Bollerslev, T.: 1986, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31(3), 307–327.
Bollerslev, T.: 1987, A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return, The Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 542–547.
Boswijk, H.P. and van der Weide, R.: 2006, Wake me up before you GOGARCH, Discussion Papers 06-079/4, Tinbergen Institute.
deGoeij, P. and Marquering, W.: 2004, Modeling the conditional covariance between stock and bond returns: A multivariate GARCH approach, Journal of Financial Econometrics 2(4), 531–564.
Ding, Z. and Engle, R.: 2001, Large scale conditional covariance matrix modeling, estimation and testing, Academia Economic Papers 29(2), 157–184.
Dueck, G. and Scheuer, T.: 1990, Threshold accepting: A general purpose algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing, Journal of Computational Physics 90, 161–175.
Dueck, G. and Winker, P.: 1992, New concepts and algorithms for portfolio choice, Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 8, 159–178.
Engle, R.: 1982, Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica 50(1), 987–1007.
Engle, R. and Marcucci, J.: 2006, A long-run pure variance common features model for the common volatilities of the Dow Jones, Journal of Econometrics 132(1), 7–42.
Engle, R.F. and Kroner, K.F.: 1995, Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, Econometric Theory 11(1), 122–150.
Giannopoulos, K., Clark, E. and Tunaru, R.: 2005, Portfolio selection under VaR constraints, Computational Management Science 2(2), 123–138.
Gilli, M. and Këllezi, E.: 2002a, A global optimization heuristic for portfolio choice with VaR and Expected Shortfall, in E.J. Kontoghiorghes, Berç Rustem and S. Siokos (eds), Computational Methods in Decision-making, Economics and Finance, Kluwer, pp. 165–181.
Gilli, M. and Këllezi, E.: 2002b, The threshold accepting heuristic for index tracking, in P. Pardalos and V.K. Tsitsiringos (eds), Financial Engineering, E-Commerce, and Supply Chain, Applied Optimization Series, Kluwer, pp. 1–18.
Gilli, M., Këllezi, E. and Hysi, H.: 2006, A data-driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization, Journal of Risk 8(3), 1–18.
Gilli, M. and Winker, P.: 2007, Heuristic optimization methods in econometrics, in E. Kontoghiorghes et al. (ed.), Handbook on Computational Econometrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam. forthcoming.
Jorion, P.: 2000, Value at Risk, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, Chicago et al.
Kuester, K., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M.S.: 2006, Value-at-risk prediction: A comparison of alternative strategies, Journal of Financial Econometrics 4(1), 53–89.
Longin, F. and Solnik, B.: 2001, Extreme correlation of international equity returns, Journal of Finance 56(2), 649–676.
Maringer, D.: 2005, Portfolio Management with Heuristic Optimization, Springer, Dordrecht.
Maringer, D. and Winker, P.: 2003, Portfolio optimization under different risk constraints with modified memetic algorithms, Discussion Paper No. 2003-005E, Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt.
Moscato, P.: 1989, On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: Towards memetic algorithms, Report 790, Caltech Concurrent Computation Program.
Pojarliev, M. and Polasek, W.: 2003, Portfolio construction by volatility forecasts: does the covariance structure matter?, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 17(1), 103–116.
Saunders, A. and Allen, L. (eds): 2002, Credit Risk Measurement: New Approaches to Value-at-Risk and Other Paradigms, 2nd edn, Wiley, New York, NY.
Specht, K. and Gohout, W.: 2003, Portfolio selection using the principal components GARCH model, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 17(4), 450–458.
van der Weide, R.: 2002, GO-GARCH: A multivariate generalized orthogonal GARCH model, Journal of Applied Econometrics 17, 549–564.
Winker, P.: 2001, Optimization Heuristics in Econometrics. Applications of Threshold Accepting, John Wiley & Sons, ltd., Chichester et al.
Winker, P. and Maringer, D.: 2007, The hidden risks of optimizing bond portfolios under VaR, Journal of Risk 9(4), 1–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Specht, K., Winker, P. (2008). Portfolio Optimization under VaR Constraints Based on Dynamic Estimates of the Variance-Covariance Matrix. In: Kontoghiorghes, E.J., Rustem, B., Winker, P. (eds) Computational Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77958-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77958-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77957-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77958-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)